Coach Prohm Gets Extension

Forgive the chronological mashup to simplify things, but it seems the goalposts will always be on the move for Prohm.

Can Prohm gain the respect of Niang and co. and win with "Hoiberg Guys?" Will there be a mutiny? UNC under Daugherty, Kentucky losing to Oral Roberts in the NIT, Generational Talent in Ben Simmons not sniffing the tournament, etc. There are so many examples of more talented teams not making the tournament. I'm not sure Prohm can get it done.

OK, so that year was good, but preseason top 10 team. Sure Naz then went out for the year after that preseason ranking, but finishing in the Sweet 16 and top 15 is still underacheiving. We all know Georges was really coaching the team anyway. Let's see if they can win without Georges.

Sure, they won without Georges, but now that he has to build his own team, let's see if he can bring in high ranked HS talent.

Sure, he got Lindell and THT, but how good is he at identifying under the radar recruits.

Sure, Haliburton and Young are pretty good underranked guys, but can he bring in transfers?

OK, Shayok and Jacobson look legit, but can he make the tournament with his own guys?

So he won the Big 12 tournament and got one of the highest seeds in ISU history with his guys, but the way that team beat the crap out of a mediocre KU team in Hilton, it's clear that this team has tons of talent and drastically underacheived.

Fred built ISU into a powerhouse. Those were four HISTORIC NCAA tournament wins he achieved at ISU. This program should be on autopilot. He left Prohm Monte, who plays a lot of minutes on in the NBA!!! Nader, Georges, Naz and Burton all have gotten some NBA minutes this year. How did Prohm lose any games with so damn much talent?!?!

Now he can't retain great players like Lard. I didn't watch any of the other games, but I saw the Ohio St. game, and it's clear Lard should've been playing more. No wonder he transferred. He should go somewhere where a coach will appreciate and utilize his talents.

This post is great but really needs the finisher:

Maybe Prohm should talk to CMC so he can learn about toughness and effort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyfanatic
This post is great but really needs the finisher:

Maybe Prohm should talk to CMC so he can learn about toughness and effort.

Inbounds plays, man. It's all about inbounds plays. That reminds me, did anybody watch HOF coach Jay Wright's Villanova team absolutely suck balls on inbounds plays this weekend? Even got a 5 second count coming out of a timeout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc and cyfanatic
Best of all, more annoying **** like this from people like you.
I know him, he's so negative on Prohm. I just don't get people's mentality on sending a guy packing that's matched Hoiberg's wins and dug himself out of a hole that Fred put him in. Stuff like that leaves programs hurting for awhile. We all know that Fred likely won't have as much success in the transfer portal this time around as there are way more big names in that market now. Prohm has done well with recruiting both HS and transfers. Yeah, most of us can agree on that fact he does need some more help and experience in the in game management and coaching, but most coaches have some type of flaws. Fred didn't know what defense was, hated recruiting, let his players do whatever they wanted it seemed, and his teams still had a lot of let down games.
 
I would take that season and game over this season any day. Not sure what your point is. Finished second in the conference, won the big 12 tourney over a top 10 KU team, had a top 10 AP ranking ourselves. Niang played a horrible game at a bad time.

Lol, were you lost that game? Everyone played a horrible game that day. BDJ had some type of locker room confrontation. Niang couldn't make a shot. McKay didn't show up defensively, Thomas was the only one who looked like he cared and wanted to be there. UAB was a bad bad team. Like real bad. There's no way in sam hell they should have lost that game. I was way more angry after that game, as it ruined the entire ncaa tourney for me with it being the very first game.
 
Another perspective is this isn’t the Iowa State of the 1980’s.

Orr’s teams would have been meltdown worthy now, but back then it fostered new excitement into ISU athletics.

that's true. Prohm didn't have to rebuild. He inherited gold compared to Orr. Orr built the program, then dipped, then built up again. then dipped, then retired.
 
Curious to see if there will be anything about how the extension went down. The timing of it seemed suspicious.

Its weird... Its as if JP and CSP were working on this for about a month yet even with the loss we still went through with it. Its ALMOST like JP thinks CSP is a perfect fit for our university and to serve as a role model for our players. Eerie really when you get down to it.
 
Yeah, definitely a different era. Not only was he following an era that was much worse, but his terrible road record wasnt as visible to people because fewer of those games even made it onto tv. What people saw were the home wins, which Prohm and Orr are pretty comparable at about 75%.

Are you trying to tell me we LOST AT HOME while Johnny was the coach here?

Blasphemy.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: TwinCitiesCy
Are you trying to tell me we LOST AT HOME while Johnny was the coach here?

Blasphemy.

A bigger picture in terms of home games

Home winning percentages

Orr 73.7%
Floyd 75.8%
Eustachy 83.5%
Morgan 80%
McDermott .667
Hoiberg 87.2%
Prohm 74.6%

Though... the makeup of who we're playing at home has probably changed. An additional conference game and some home games replaced with neutral tournaments.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: isutrevman
A bigger picture in terms of home games

Home winning percentages

Orr 73.7%
Floyd 75.8%
Eustachy 83.5%
Morgan 80%
McDermott .667
Hoiberg 87.2%
Prohm 74.6%

Though... the makeup of who we're playing at home has probably changed. An additional conference game and some home games replaced with neutral tournaments.

Seasons are longer now. We play in the low-30s for games, not the high-20s.

How many home games are there now per season... and... if there are more, are there just more against cupcakes, or are we filling it up with Big 12 games or good challenge series against other high-major squads, like Tennessee two years ago?

I wonder what the Prohm number is if you take the "down" year out.

And man, McDermott was bad.

I guess you can see more of the Hoiberg warm fuzzy there -- man, people saw him win at home a lot, fed into the Johnny nostalgia for Hilton Magic, though those teams did not have the road pedigree that Prohm is slowly building up now.
 
Way to manipulate statistics to make a point which is not valid.

You have to consider the situation that these two coaches walked into. Before Johnny got to ISU, hoops was terrible. You could show up 15 min before any game and buy a ticket anywhere in the arena. Johnny established the culture and brought some Magic to Hilton. His teams made it an arena that opponents no longer looked forward to visiting.

I can tell you from being in the arena for those seasons, Johnny made basketball exciting for the fans. Even when they lost it was still very entertaining basketball and when they did win it was cause for euphoria.

When CSP took over he was handed a loaded roster with Sweet 16 talent. His job was to continue to build on the foundation which was already laid.

I think the jury is still out on his legacy. We don't yet know if he can improve on what Fred had built. He deserves more time and it looks like he will get it.

To compare the two coaches fairly you should also look at their records before arriving at ISU. CSP did very well at Murray State and should be recognized as such. Johnny was quite successful at Michigan, a much higher profile program than Murray State or ISU. What Johnny did was turn around a program which had been horrible for decades, much like CMC is doing for the football team. That is worthy of a great deal of respect. CSP was obviously a lot younger a coach when he came to ISU, so he deserves time to see how well he can do.

I can agree with almost everything you said. but what did i manipulate? I gave literal stats from 2 coaches and their careers as ISU head coaches (thus far). i didn't alter or manipulate anything.
 
Inbounds plays, man. It's all about inbounds plays. That reminds me, did anybody watch HOF coach Jay Wright's Villanova team absolutely suck balls on inbounds plays this weekend? Even got a 5 second count coming out of a timeout.

Physics of the ball doing everything but going in on that last roll from UCF and bang-bang (arguably favorable although I've seen worse not get called) calls are why HOF Coach K is coaching this week.
 
  • Like
Reactions: isutrevman
A bigger picture in terms of home games

Home winning percentages

Orr 73.7%
Floyd 75.8%
Eustachy 83.5%
Morgan 80%
McDermott .667
Hoiberg 87.2%
Prohm 74.6%

Though... the makeup of who we're playing at home has probably changed. An additional conference game and some home games replaced with neutral tournaments.


Johnny coached at a time when they played a 14 game schedule.
 
Look at the schedules Johnny played in his first couple of seasons.

And it was with next to no players.

It truly was a different era.


Wow. I just looked at his first several seasons. It was a different era indeed. Apparently it was much easier to schedule home & home series with other P5 schools at that time.
 
Last edited:
I'm not enthralled with adding that many years but anymore you have to do it to show commitment for recruiting purposes so we have to live with it. It's the landscape.

I was ok with what Prohm did with Fred's guys and expected last year. There was uncertainty to start this season but I think a .500 record in THIS year's B12 was a let down. The injury to Solo is vastly understated...see the tOSU game, but there was still some real head scratchers in there for the talent we had. If I'm oversimplifying, he didn't overachieve. I think people can draw their own conclusions as to what we should expect or if we "deserve" better.

No part of me wanted him gone, let me make that clear, but I hope he learns and improves. The best coaches in the game are always adapting. ISU has shown their commitment. The fan base teeters between passionate and obsessive, but that's better than playing in front of 3000 people. We take more people to KC than a lot of P6 programs draw for home games. Facilities and player amenities/academic support are more than competitive. Prohm has what he needs to succeed and plenty to build on. I don't expect conference titles and final fours every year, but I hope for more than what we saw this year and will be cheering hard for it to happen.
 
Last edited:
Look at the schedules Johnny played in his first couple of seasons.

And it was with next to no players.

It truly was a different era.

It’s like he said, everybody wanted to play him as soon as he got to Ames.