Cadillac vs Lincoln

cowboycurtis

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2006
1,308
631
113
We owned a Navigator for several years. Drove 80,000 miles. Very nice car. Never had an issue with it ever. We have an Expedition now which is nice but it doesn’t ride as good and isn’t as quiet as the Navigator was. We would like to get back to a Navigator eventually
 

hoosman

Well-Known Member
Sep 4, 2006
2,099
1,607
113
Davenport
I have CT5, Eseries, A7, Genesis, and MKZ on my watchlist. The Continental and CT6 are too large for my taste, but I am sure they are very smooth and powerful. I am not interested in the 5series, since I have already owned the z4 and 335. Also, I am not a fan of the carbon fiber on Lexus. Seems like Cadillac has more technology and used Lincolns are less expensive than Caddys. I test drove CTS, ATS, A7. The A7 checked all the boxes- styling, ride, performance. American cars seem to cost less for parts and service. Reliability is oversold IMO. I have driven a 2015 Chrysler 200c for over 7 years without a single repair. All reports says it is junk.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: 0u812

Stewo

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2008
16,856
14,812
113
Iowa
There are far more Cadillac options than Lincoln, so it really depends on what you're wanting to purchase. I love the V-line vehicles Cadillac offers. Personally, I prefer the new Lincoln SUV line over the Cadillacs, but you really can't go wrong either way.
 

besserheimerphat

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
11,364
15,047
113
Mount Vernon, WA
My impression is that the Caddy sedans are more performance oriented - their competition is Mercedes AMGs and BMWs - whereas the Lincoln is more about passenger comfort. Quiet, smooth ride, more plush seating, etc.

I have no interest in either the Escalade or Navigator. IMO they both seem to be 100% about status signaling rather than being good at the things an SUV should be good at. Off road, towing, cargo, able to handle dirt/grime, etc.
 

dmclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2006
21,476
5,803
113
50131
I have no interest in either the Escalade or Navigator. IMO they both seem to be 100% about status signaling rather than being good at the things an SUV should be good at. Off road, towing, cargo, able to handle dirt/grime, etc.
I can't imagine anyone buying a $100k+ luxury SUV and worrying about things like off-road, handle dirt grime, etc. Have you been in one of these? They are some of the most luxurious vehicles being made. They're powerful, they have a TON of space, their quiet, their luxurious, can pull 8k lbs, etc. No, a Navigator is not a wrangler.
 

somecyguy

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2006
3,471
3,911
113
The A7 checked all the boxes- styling, ride, performance. American cars seem to cost less for parts and service. Reliability is oversold IMO. I have driven a 2015 Chrysler 200c for over 7 years without a single repair. All reports says it is junk.
I have an A6 now, at some point moving to a A7/S7. German cars have their gremlins which can be annoying, but my A6 is pushing 128K miles and it's still rock solid. I will never get used to the $200 oil changes though.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 0u812

besserheimerphat

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
11,364
15,047
113
Mount Vernon, WA
I can't imagine anyone buying a $100k+ luxury SUV and worrying about things like off-road, handle dirt grime, etc. Have you been in one of these? They are some of the most luxurious vehicles being made. They're powerful, they have a TON of space, their quiet, their luxurious, can pull 8k lbs, etc. No, a Navigator is not a wrangler.
I'm just saying that I personally would not buy an SUV just to be a highway queen.

I also can't imagine a person who buys a $100k vehicle hauling garbage to the dump, or a load of mulch/gravel, etc. Not that the vehicle isn't capable, but you don't see it. Compare that to a Suburban/Expedition.
 

DevilDog

Active Member
Apr 9, 2006
713
248
43
Janesville
I drive a '19 XT5 & wife has a '15 ATS absolutely love both of them. Used to have an '11 SRX which also drove like a dream.
 

cygrads

Well-Known Member
Jul 27, 2007
4,969
2,728
113
Altoona, IA
I bought a used 2007 Cadillac DTSin 2015 and it was the nicest car I have ever owned. Very smooth ride but got rid of it because it rode too low for my wife to get in and out of.
 

NWICY

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2012
34,359
30,421
113
I own both an Audi and BMW. From where I live it's 2 1/2 hours each way for these to be serviced. So, in that respect, I truly regret owning these.

Until your last sentence I thought you were not so humbe bragging;)
 

BuffettClone

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2012
2,622
1,906
113
I'm just saying that I personally would not buy an SUV just to be a highway queen.

I also can't imagine a person who buys a $100k vehicle hauling garbage to the dump, or a load of mulch/gravel, etc. Not that the vehicle isn't capable, but you don't see it. Compare that to a Suburban/Expedition.

Same reason I never understood the Lincoln truck. Who buys a Lincoln and uses it like an actual truck?
 
  • Like
Reactions: besserheimerphat

1961Cylones

Member
Aug 18, 2021
83
88
18
70
Strongly agree with the majority. Lincoln is superior in almost every aspect. Much more smooth and comfortable ride, if you get one that's been taken care of, maintenance won't be an issue, and they'll outlast anything GM puts out 2 to 1, (at least).

I drove them on and off for 20 yrs. IMO, there's no comparison... Heck, I've driven Mercury Grand Marquis' and Ford Crown Vics I'd take over any Caddie.
 

0u812

Active Member
Jan 14, 2012
748
-338
43
50
Lexus is probably a better overall vehicle.

OP, what kind of vehicle are you looking to get specifically? Sedan? SUV?
 

NickTheGreat

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 17, 2012
10,753
4,719
113
Central Iowa
I would say Cadillac and not even close. But it probably depends a little on the models in question, thought I can't think of any Lincoln I'd by over the Cadillac,
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron