Who wrote the marital rights laws in Iowa?

If they have retirement accounts...it is about to get real fun.
I knew a guy that was married for like 6 months one time then got a divorce. The woman tried to get some of his retirement and the judge said anything marriage less than 3 years was a short term marriage and so he owed nothing to the woman. Why in the hell would someone you are married to short term be deserving of someones retirement? Another awful law. I could see if it was like a 20 year marriage. Another reason to stay single.
 
For everyone ******** about getting taken to the cleaners, it’s called a prenup. Hell you can even get a postnup.

If you can’t have an adult enough conversation about this before you get married you shouldn’t get married and 100% shouldn’t be having kids.

This isn’t hard you’re just making it that way
Alternatively, you start out with jack squat to your name then everything this truely 50/50.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NATEizKING
I’m more in AuH2O’s camp. I think a lot of the “taken to the cleaner’s” stuff can be because one partner had to put their career more on hold than the other. If I’m a stay-at-home parent or was the primary care giver (so I couldn’t focus as much on my career) I should get a lot more in the divorce because my spouse was making a lot more money while I was doing a lot more unpaid labor.
What responsibility is the homemaker taking on for that decision? If they file for divorce, they know they will be awarded spousal support and assets to make up for that lost time. Relatively risk-free decision for that party. The higher earner has to pay for their ex's lost time in the workforce but they don't receive adjusted custody to make up for the lost time with the child, it's a double negative. That's the problem.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BWRhasnoAC
I think the asset division will always be messy but the child custody is very clearly slanted in one direction and not always for reasons that make sense.
What responsibility is the homemaker taking on for that decision? If they file for divorce, they know they will be awarded spousal support and assets to make up for that lost time. Relatively risk-free decision for that party. The higher earner has to pay for their ex's lost time in the workforce but they don't receive adjusted custody to make up for the lost time with the child, it's a double negative. That's the problem.
 
Child free people would like a word. I’ve worked so many holidays not having kids just by default or being put on random midnights just because I obv have more flexibility not having kids. It’s a touch annoying
I mean, I wouldn't do that. I'd just tell people "no" and to suck it.
 
What responsibility is the homemaker taking on for that decision? If they file for divorce, they know they will be awarded spousal support and assets to make up for that lost time. Relatively risk-free decision for that party. The higher earner has to pay for their ex's lost time in the workforce but they don't receive adjusted custody to make up for the lost time with the child, it's a double negative. That's the problem.
You know what can help with that and prevent those problems….
 
I mean, I wouldn't do that. I'd just tell people "no" and to suck it.
Sometimes the schedule already gets made before input, usually it’s fighting the future battles. Honestly the holiday stuff isn’t that bad, the random midnights we push back on much more aggressively
 
I knew a guy that was married for like 6 months one time then got a divorce. The woman tried to get some of his retirement and the judge said anything marriage less than 3 years was a short term marriage and so he owed nothing to the woman. Why in the hell would someone you are married to short term be deserving of someones retirement? Another awful law. I could see if it was like a 20 year marriage. Another reason to stay single.
Yeah, THAT’s the reason you’re single.
 
All states do and if anyone has been through a divorce, it's crazy lopsided against males. I am not doing a poor me thing even though my ex took me to the cleaners in our divorce (Money Wise). My female attorney basically said it, dude you are screwed because the laws don't like men in divorce, even when it's not their fault. She said luckily don't live in California or they would issue you a lifetime of alimony. I had to pay three years of alimony and child support. Even though I got 50/50 on my kids. Which I paid but also it makes no sense at all.

I'm still paying my ex when my kid is there 2-3 nights a month on average. I also pay all his expenses. Attorney told me it would be 20 Gs to take her to court because she won't sign anything over and if she decided to fight back it's far from a guaranteed W. It just is what it is I guess. Four more years...
 
I'm still paying my ex when my kid is there 2-3 nights a month on average. I also pay all his expenses. Attorney told me it would be 20 Gs to take her to court because she won't sign anything over and if she decided to fight back it's far from a guaranteed W. It just is what it is I guess. Four more years...


Yeah it's unreal. They should change the name from Child support to ex wife support.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drmwevr08
I don't know if age has anything to do with some of this situations but I never thought it was a good idea to get married young. Like before 25. There is so much growth the couple years out of college. People can completely change after being in the real world for a while.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: FriendlySpartan

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron