Financial benefits of being married…….ok what am I not getting?
Singles are the last group that it is legal to discriminate against.Tax brackets, potentially employer benefits, borrowing power, etc...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Financial benefits of being married…….ok what am I not getting?
Singles are the last group that it is legal to discriminate against.Tax brackets, potentially employer benefits, borrowing power, etc...
We gave you your own singles awareness day, ironically the acronym is SAD but I swear that was a coincidence.Singles are the last group that it is legal to discriminate against.
Child free people would like a word. I’ve worked so many holidays not having kids just by default or being put on random midnights just because I obv have more flexibility not having kids. It’s a touch annoyingSingles are the last group that it is legal to discriminate against.
I knew a guy that was married for like 6 months one time then got a divorce. The woman tried to get some of his retirement and the judge said anything marriage less than 3 years was a short term marriage and so he owed nothing to the woman. Why in the hell would someone you are married to short term be deserving of someones retirement? Another awful law. I could see if it was like a 20 year marriage. Another reason to stay single.If they have retirement accounts...it is about to get real fun.
Alternatively, you start out with jack squat to your name then everything this truely 50/50.For everyone ******** about getting taken to the cleaners, it’s called a prenup. Hell you can even get a postnup.
If you can’t have an adult enough conversation about this before you get married you shouldn’t get married and 100% shouldn’t be having kids.
This isn’t hard you’re just making it that way
What responsibility is the homemaker taking on for that decision? If they file for divorce, they know they will be awarded spousal support and assets to make up for that lost time. Relatively risk-free decision for that party. The higher earner has to pay for their ex's lost time in the workforce but they don't receive adjusted custody to make up for the lost time with the child, it's a double negative. That's the problem.I’m more in AuH2O’s camp. I think a lot of the “taken to the cleaner’s” stuff can be because one partner had to put their career more on hold than the other. If I’m a stay-at-home parent or was the primary care giver (so I couldn’t focus as much on my career) I should get a lot more in the divorce because my spouse was making a lot more money while I was doing a lot more unpaid labor.
What responsibility is the homemaker taking on for that decision? If they file for divorce, they know they will be awarded spousal support and assets to make up for that lost time. Relatively risk-free decision for that party. The higher earner has to pay for their ex's lost time in the workforce but they don't receive adjusted custody to make up for the lost time with the child, it's a double negative. That's the problem.
I mean, I wouldn't do that. I'd just tell people "no" and to suck it.Child free people would like a word. I’ve worked so many holidays not having kids just by default or being put on random midnights just because I obv have more flexibility not having kids. It’s a touch annoying
Prenup can protect your future assets as well, honestly it sometimes can be more important depending on what your life goals areAlternatively, you start out with jack squat to your name then everything this truely 50/50.
You know what can help with that and prevent those problems….What responsibility is the homemaker taking on for that decision? If they file for divorce, they know they will be awarded spousal support and assets to make up for that lost time. Relatively risk-free decision for that party. The higher earner has to pay for their ex's lost time in the workforce but they don't receive adjusted custody to make up for the lost time with the child, it's a double negative. That's the problem.
Sometimes the schedule already gets made before input, usually it’s fighting the future battles. Honestly the holiday stuff isn’t that bad, the random midnights we push back on much more aggressivelyI mean, I wouldn't do that. I'd just tell people "no" and to suck it.
Yeah, THAT’s the reason you’re single.I knew a guy that was married for like 6 months one time then got a divorce. The woman tried to get some of his retirement and the judge said anything marriage less than 3 years was a short term marriage and so he owed nothing to the woman. Why in the hell would someone you are married to short term be deserving of someones retirement? Another awful law. I could see if it was like a 20 year marriage. Another reason to stay single.
All states do and if anyone has been through a divorce, it's crazy lopsided against males. I am not doing a poor me thing even though my ex took me to the cleaners in our divorce (Money Wise). My female attorney basically said it, dude you are screwed because the laws don't like men in divorce, even when it's not their fault. She said luckily don't live in California or they would issue you a lifetime of alimony. I had to pay three years of alimony and child support. Even though I got 50/50 on my kids. Which I paid but also it makes no sense at all.
That Cornhub subscription looks cheaper all the time...
More discrimination against the singlesIf they ever turn it back on again...
I'm still paying my ex when my kid is there 2-3 nights a month on average. I also pay all his expenses. Attorney told me it would be 20 Gs to take her to court because she won't sign anything over and if she decided to fight back it's far from a guaranteed W. It just is what it is I guess. Four more years...
Marry someone who makes more than you.You know what can help with that and prevent those problems….