Tailgating idea to solve the red line problems
Tailgating idea to solve the red line problems
I have. I was just making a joke that the high school's new stadium and practice facility was so unbelievable that the recruit would not be pressed with our own. Guess it was a pretty bad joke based on all the flak I've received.Have you been inside the Stark Athletic Facility? Lol or our locker rooms?
My fault. I couldn't read the sarcasm lolI have. I was just making a joke that the high school's new stadium and practice facility was so unbelievable that the recruit would not be pressed with our own. Guess it was a pretty bad joke based on all the flak I've received.
It's stupid to exchange something used 7 days a year for something used hundreds of days per year.Watching the parking situation around JTS change and be refigured over the past 10 years, has continued my belief that ISU is soon to end up like EIU regarding parking around the stadium. I said at the time, that the university should have taken over the intermural fields to the east and converted that to parking or erected a parking ramp garage there. Was severally chastised for the suggestion of moving those fields out by the cross-country fields.
So, what you are saying is the people that controlled the fields wanted an infinitely better set up than what they currently have like adding field turf and lights, neither of which they had at the time, or they were refusing to move?It's stupid to exchange something used 7 days a year for something used hundreds of days per year.
When I was in school the proposal was floated but athletics didn't have enough land in suitable condition to just swap. The land that they had available needed tens of millions in upgrades for recreation services to maintain the same level of service they had. They were willing to give up space but the request was for field turf and lights so they had additional hours they could use the space. Athletics (rightly) didn't want to commit the money to that when there were significant needs elsewhere.
The iowa state tents are actually 9x9. Or at least the one I have is. When I was shopping around I didn't find any isu tents that weren't 9x9.How are you going to make a 10' tent fit in a 9' wide space?
Most are 9x9, that is true. I have a 10x10 and since most tents are 9x9, the accessories like shades/wind guards are too small for the tent I have. There are some 10x10 tents out there.The iowa state tents are actually 9x9. Or at least the one I have is. When I was shopping around I didn't find any isu tents that weren't 9x9.
They aren't used during the winter to my knowledge. There are spring, fall, and summer intramural (or at least used to be...albeit much lower participation than fall and spring) sports. The sports clubs use them for tournaments. The Iowa Games use them. Special Olympics use them. March 1 to May 1 and September 1-November 15 is 170ish days of usage by students.So, what you are saying is the people that controlled the fields wanted an infinitely better set up than what they currently have like adding field turf and lights, neither of which they had at the time, or they were refusing to move?
Funny I have been by those fields a few times this summer, never in use, never seen them used in the winter months during bb season, I get the students are not in school some of that time, but 100's of days a year is not true either.
While I get the idea that the university is for the students, they would not have been harmed by appeasing the fans that pump millions of dollars into the university for no other reason than attending sporting events. I am quite sure they could have made new fields somewhere else that would not have cost ten's of millions of dollars
I stand corrected, it is 9X9. so a little on the roof, will make itThose ISU tents that tailgaters put up are 9x9
Intramural services owned the land. The athletic department wanted it. But they didn’t have the ground available to make the trade. That’s all there is to it.So, what you are saying is the people that controlled the fields wanted an infinitely better set up than what they currently have like adding field turf and lights, neither of which they had at the time, or they were refusing to move?
Funny I have been by those fields a few times this summer, never in use, never seen them used in the winter months during bb season, I get the students are not in school some of that time, but 100's of days a year is not true either.
While I get the idea that the university is for the students, they would not have been harmed by appeasing the fans that pump millions of dollars into the university for no other reason than attending sporting events. I am quite sure they could have made new fields somewhere else that would not have cost ten's of millions of dollars.
Not to nitpick but March 1st to May 1st is 61 days, and Sept 1st to Nov. 15 is roughly 75 days, so around a total of 136 days if used every day during that time span, quite a bit short of the 170ish days. The Special Olympics and Iowa Games were a week long, so add another 14 days there. So even if used all those days, its only roughly 150 days, not the 170ish.They aren't used during the winter to my knowledge. There are spring, fall, and summer intramural (or at least used to be...albeit much lower participation than fall and spring) sports. The sports clubs use them for tournaments. The Iowa Games use them. Special Olympics use them. March 1 to May 1 and September 1-November 15 is 170ish days of usage by students.
I could be wrong on the amount but the best athletics could offer for a land swap was about a 50% reduction in space at the cross country course but the land needed significant grading, utility work, and parking improvements. In order to serve the same number of activities they needed field turf and lighting to keep surfaces playable for longer hours. Rec Services already had the plans together for the current facilities and determined that's what they needed for a suitable replacement.
If I remember right wasn't the current facility $12M or so? $20M+ doesn't seem out of line at all for the extra work that would've needed to happen for a different space.
Wait until they pave the lots north of S. 16th. Then you're going to hear people complain.