Cyclones to be spoilers?

Don’t care if we’re spoilers but we have a TON riding on a strong finish. From what I hear, there is a lot of recruiting impact based on how we finish, and not just with future recruits but current commits.
 
It starts with OU and I am really glad it does. I sincerely believe we beat OU. And I don't think the game will be a nail-biter either. I would not be surprised if it's closer to an ass-beating than a tight game.
 
Don’t care if we’re spoilers but we have a TON riding on a strong finish. From what I hear, there is a lot of recruiting impact based on how we finish, and not just with future recruits but current commits.
Very scary
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cygrads
I know we like to make ourselves feel better with the losing margin stats, but how many of those games did we have a lead? I'd be more interested in how many minutes in those games we were tied or leading compared to minutes losing. Losing "close" comes in many forms, but I suspect those games weren't as close as it sounds.
 
I know we like to make ourselves feel better with the losing margin stats, but how many of those games did we have a lead? I'd be more interested in how many minutes in those games we were tied or leading compared to minutes losing. Losing "close" comes in many forms, but I suspect those games weren't as close as it sounds.
Not exactly what you were looking for, but Post Game Win Expectancy tells how likely a win was given the per-play stats that were generated. This is from the same guy that does SP+ for ESPN. Basically says "if this game was played a million billion times and the same stats were generated each time, how often does your team win the game?" Also uses the simulation to create an adjusted margin that can be compared to the actual margin. All of this is calculated using the same stats that go into calculating SP+.


Using PGWE, ISU has only really been close against Baylor (40% PGWE, -2.0 adj margin - a toss up). In our other 3 losses, PGWE was less than 17% and the adj margins are between -7.8 and -18.6.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SolarGarlic
Not exactly what you were looking for, but Post Game Win Expectancy tells how likely a win was given the per-play stats that were generated. This is from the same guy that does SP+ for ESPN. Basically says "if this game was played a million billion times and the same stats were generated each time, how often does your team win the game?" Also uses the simulation to create an adjusted margin that can be compared to the actual margin. All of this is calculated using the same stats that go into calculating SP+.


Using PGWE, ISU has only really been close against Baylor (40% PGWE, -2.0 adj margin - a toss up). In our other 3 losses, PGWE was less than 17% and the adj margins are between -7.8 and -18.6.
Exactly. Yes, we lost to KSU by 1. But they had a 99% post game win expectancy. We could've won, maybe even should have, but it was an anomaly.
 
I'm officially rooting for TCU in every game but ours the rest of this season. I like the way Duggan plays and obviously pull for kids with Iowa roots.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cygrads
Worst case scenario is ISU goes 5-7 and knock's an undefeated TCU or one loss OSU out of the CFP.

If OSU gets past KSU this weekend, their remaining schedule is the lowest 4 teams in the current standings. I WANT them to be a 1-loss team. Far less likely TCU keeps this up. Their remaining schedule is @ WV, always tough. Home against Tech, folled by two road trips to Austin and Waco. The it's us too finish the year. TCU could very easily go 3-2 the rest of the way and no one would be shocked. OSU will be a favorite in 4/5 remaining. TCU is likely 3/5.

I want ISU to win out at home. Then we can re-visit allegiances come 11/26.

Isn't the worst case scenario 3-9???
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dormeezy
Don’t care if we’re spoilers but we have a TON riding on a strong finish. From what I hear, there is a lot of recruiting impact based on how we finish, and not just with future recruits but current commits.
Wouldn’t be surprised if Jason Hammond decommits. No inside info. Just a hunch.
 
Last edited: