Big 12 Expansion (new thread)

cyIclSoneU

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2016
3,300
4,562
113
It’s willfully ignorant to act like there aren’t non football/TV value reasons why BYU hasn’t been in a power league before now. On those metrics they absolutely belong and are a good addition. They would add football and TV value to the current or new Big 12, the Pac-12, or the ACC.
 

knowlesjam

Well-Known Member
Oct 21, 2012
4,325
4,776
113
Papillion, NE
that is false.
Can you say that for sure? My recollection of BYU over the years is that their limitations (no Sunday play) along with their own network (and they wanted this to continue if they moved to a P5 conference) was what kept them out of the room. And, we certainly have seen the meddling that the Texas government has had on the B12. Another reason why the SEC is more than welcome to now have Texas...good luck.

BYU brings a near guarantee of 500K+ viewers to each and every football game in the B12...that is huge. Not Texas or Oklahoma, but certainly a good number. That will play well with any media contract.
 

Bestaluckcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 25, 2009
2,171
1,610
113
Actually BYU was slated to be the 12th original member. Then Texas govt got involved and Baylor got it.

I had always heard the original Big 12 was strictly between the Southwest Conference and the Big 8. This was before BYU went independent, so they were a member of another conference. What is your source that BYU was in play and considered at the time?
 

cyIclSoneU

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2016
3,300
4,562
113
I had always heard the original Big 12 was strictly between the Southwest Conference and the Big 8. This was before BYU went independent, so they were a member of another conference. What is your source that BYU was in play and considered at the time?

I dont think BYU was considered. When the writing was on the wall for the SWC, Texas, TAMU, and Arkansas originally wanted to go together to the same conference - either the SEC or Big 8. The Texas schools started to prefer the Big 8 option but Arkansas had a lifeline to the SEC and took it. Then it was supposed to be Texas, TAMU, Tech, and Houston to the Big 12 before Texas politicians with Baylor ties weaseled them into the deal at UH’s expense.
 

KnappShack

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2008
23,806
32,112
113
Parts Unknown
I dont think BYU was considered. When the writing was on the wall for the SWC, Texas, TAMU, and Arkansas originally wanted to go together to the same conference - either the SEC or Big 8. The Texas schools started to prefer the Big 8 option but Arkansas had a lifeline to the SEC and took it. Then it was supposed to be Texas, TAMU, Tech, and Houston to the Big 12 before Texas politicians with Baylor ties weaseled them into the deal at UH’s expense.

Everything I've read said BYU was absolutely under consideration very early in the Big 12 formation.

Then politics and we ended up with goddam Baylor
 

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,842
13,902
113
they already have the votes. There are already 3 conferences to vote for what they want.

If they needed the big 12, it would have been in the alliance to begin with. The fact that it’s not indicates they’re really not worried about needing their vote to check the sec.

They do want espn and Texas and Oklahoma to pay for their attempts to change the entire landscape. So they will pay lip service to wanting to keep the big 12 viable. But none of them will give up their interests to prop up any new entity.

being 3rd in a 2 person race doesn’t really mean that much. If the pac and the acc lose teams to the two super conferences, that doesn’t mean there will be a real place at the table for whatever configuration fills the vacuum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cydkar

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,551
63,603
113
Not exactly sure.
I had always heard the original Big 12 was strictly between the Southwest Conference and the Big 8. This was before BYU went independent, so they were a member of another conference. What is your source that BYU was in play and considered at the time?
from the reports in the paper when I was in college when this went down.

I just googled and there is even stuff(not linking right from phone now) that they were discussed in 93. Will keep trying to link.
 

nwcat

Active Member
Jul 20, 2016
57
114
33
from the reports in the paper when I was in college when this went down.

I just googled and there is even stuff(not linking right from phone now) that they were discussed in 93. Will keep trying to link.

BYU to the B12 in 1996 is certainly what was understood from the BYU side. The BYU AD openly discussed at the time that pressure from Texas politicians forced the B12 to take Baylor along with TT, UT and A&M thereby preventing BYU's inclusion.
 

JM4CY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 23, 2012
37,843
74,483
113
America
BYU has a brand/rep in their own way. But part of me feels like they are a sleeping giant in some ways their inclusion now in a much better league is going to awaken it.
 

Bestaluckcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 25, 2009
2,171
1,610
113
Before BYU when Arkansas was leaving SWC, I am sure the Big 8 wished to add them. They chose the SEC over Big 8. Never ever heard where anything BYU related was more than a casual inquiry.
 

nwcat

Active Member
Jul 20, 2016
57
114
33
BYU brings a near guarantee of 500K+ viewers to each and every football game in the B12...that is huge. Not Texas or Oklahoma, but certainly a good number. That will play well with any media contract.

The BYU - ASU game brought 1.5M viewers this past weekend which compares very favorably with the USC - WSU and tOSU - Tulsa and UC - UI numbers despite the USC, Ohio State and UC games being in the afternoon and the BYU game not starting until 10:30 EDT. Similar numbers came in for the BYU - Utah game the week before (again at 10:30 EDT). I'm sure last year the BYU games (almost all against Sun Belt teams) would have been a lot lower, but with quality opponents BYU's numbers are much more than 500k.

 

Gorm

With any luck we will be there by Tuesday.
Jul 6, 2010
5,842
2,718
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
Can you say that for sure? My recollection of BYU over the years is that their limitations (no Sunday play) along with their own network (and they wanted this to continue if they moved to a P5 conference) was what kept them out of the room. And, we certainly have seen the meddling that the Texas government has had on the B12. Another reason why the SEC is more than welcome to now have Texas...good luck.

BYU brings a near guarantee of 500K+ viewers to each and every football game in the B12...that is huge. Not Texas or Oklahoma, but certainly a good number. That will play well with any media contract.




Both of these books are excellent reads for a realignment junkie. The Baylor one doesn't touch on it as much as the A&M one, but they do go into some great details.
 

cyIclSoneU

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2016
3,300
4,562
113
Before BYU when Arkansas was leaving SWC, I am sure the Big 8 wished to add them. They chose the SEC over Big 8. Never ever heard where anything BYU related was more than a casual inquiry.

We may not have been all that far from this league in 1996:

Big 12 North:
Iowa State
Nebraska
Kansas
Kansas State
Colorado
BYU

Big 12 South:
Missouri
Oklahoma
Oklahoma State
Arkansas
Texas
Texas A&M
 

Die4Cy

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2010
14,972
15,857
113
BYU has a brand/rep in their own way. But part of me feels like they are a sleeping giant in some ways their inclusion now in a much better league is going to awaken it.

Yeah, but the experience at BYU is different than most other places, and I don't expect their recruiting to change all that much from what they do now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlySpartan

theshadow

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2006
19,953
19,595
113
I believe the first mention of BYU being potentially involved with the Big Eight/SWC was in December 1993, in the Houston Chronicle.

The story said that preliminary discussions included all 17 teams.

At roughly the same time, there were also "reports" that Mizzou was angling for a Big Ten invite, and that SWC "sources" were concerned about A&M going to the SEC and Texas going to the Pac-10.
 

KnappShack

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2008
23,806
32,112
113
Parts Unknown
I believe the first mention of BYU being potentially involved with the Big Eight/SWC was in December 1993, in the Houston Chronicle.

The story said that preliminary discussions included all 17 teams.

At roughly the same time, there were also "reports" that Mizzou was angling for a Big Ten invite, and that SWC "sources" were concerned about A&M going to the SEC and Texas going to the Pac-10.

It'll be fun when there's a breakaway league that splits from the SEC. I'm going to assume Texas will lead that charge and kill another conference
 

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
12,957
20,865
113
I dont think BYU was considered. When the writing was on the wall for the SWC, Texas, TAMU, and Arkansas originally wanted to go together to the same conference - either the SEC or Big 8. The Texas schools started to prefer the Big 8 option but Arkansas had a lifeline to the SEC and took it. Then it was supposed to be Texas, TAMU, Tech, and Houston to the Big 12 before Texas politicians with Baylor ties weaseled them into the deal at UH’s expense.
I don't think that is really the case. I'm not sure when Arkansas decided they were leaving for the SEC, but they started playing in 1992. Big 12 started playing in 1996. I think there was about a 2 year lead time between announcement of Big 12 formation and the actual transition. So I think the Arkansas courtship discussions were probably starting around 1990.

I think it was as much Arkansas leaving and isolating the SWC to a Texas conference was the final nail in a struggling conference.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: MeanDean

Gorm

With any luck we will be there by Tuesday.
Jul 6, 2010
5,842
2,718
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
From what I understand, in the mid to late 80's Arkansas had a desire to move to the Big 8, however, there was no consensus on a 10th team and no desire to stay at a 9 team conference. Also, there were hopes at that point in time that Kansas State might just drop out of the conference, and in that event, Arkansas would be the preferred replacement.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Itjustdoesn'tmatter

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron