Actually BYU was slated to be the 12th original member. Then Texas govt got involved and Baylor got it.
that is false.
Actually BYU was slated to be the 12th original member. Then Texas govt got involved and Baylor got it.
Can you say that for sure? My recollection of BYU over the years is that their limitations (no Sunday play) along with their own network (and they wanted this to continue if they moved to a P5 conference) was what kept them out of the room. And, we certainly have seen the meddling that the Texas government has had on the B12. Another reason why the SEC is more than welcome to now have Texas...good luck.that is false.
Actually BYU was slated to be the 12th original member. Then Texas govt got involved and Baylor got it.
I had always heard the original Big 12 was strictly between the Southwest Conference and the Big 8. This was before BYU went independent, so they were a member of another conference. What is your source that BYU was in play and considered at the time?
I dont think BYU was considered. When the writing was on the wall for the SWC, Texas, TAMU, and Arkansas originally wanted to go together to the same conference - either the SEC or Big 8. The Texas schools started to prefer the Big 8 option but Arkansas had a lifeline to the SEC and took it. Then it was supposed to be Texas, TAMU, Tech, and Houston to the Big 12 before Texas politicians with Baylor ties weaseled them into the deal at UH’s expense.
Actually BYU was slated to be the 12th original member. Then Texas govt got involved and Baylor got it.
they already have the votes. There are already 3 conferences to vote for what they want.
If they needed the big 12, it would have been in the alliance to begin with. The fact that it’s not indicates they’re really not worried about needing their vote to check the sec.
They do want espn and Texas and Oklahoma to pay for their attempts to change the entire landscape. So they will pay lip service to wanting to keep the big 12 viable. But none of them will give up their interests to prop up any new entity.
being 3rd in a 2 person race doesn’t really mean that much. If the pac and the acc lose teams to the two super conferences, that doesn’t mean there will be a real place at the table for whatever configuration fills the vacuum.
from the reports in the paper when I was in college when this went down.I had always heard the original Big 12 was strictly between the Southwest Conference and the Big 8. This was before BYU went independent, so they were a member of another conference. What is your source that BYU was in play and considered at the time?
from the reports in the paper when I was in college when this went down.
I just googled and there is even stuff(not linking right from phone now) that they were discussed in 93. Will keep trying to link.
BYU brings a near guarantee of 500K+ viewers to each and every football game in the B12...that is huge. Not Texas or Oklahoma, but certainly a good number. That will play well with any media contract.
Can you say that for sure? My recollection of BYU over the years is that their limitations (no Sunday play) along with their own network (and they wanted this to continue if they moved to a P5 conference) was what kept them out of the room. And, we certainly have seen the meddling that the Texas government has had on the B12. Another reason why the SEC is more than welcome to now have Texas...good luck.
BYU brings a near guarantee of 500K+ viewers to each and every football game in the B12...that is huge. Not Texas or Oklahoma, but certainly a good number. That will play well with any media contract.
Before BYU when Arkansas was leaving SWC, I am sure the Big 8 wished to add them. They chose the SEC over Big 8. Never ever heard where anything BYU related was more than a casual inquiry.
BYU has a brand/rep in their own way. But part of me feels like they are a sleeping giant in some ways their inclusion now in a much better league is going to awaken it.
I believe the first mention of BYU being potentially involved with the Big Eight/SWC was in December 1993, in the Houston Chronicle.
The story said that preliminary discussions included all 17 teams.
At roughly the same time, there were also "reports" that Mizzou was angling for a Big Ten invite, and that SWC "sources" were concerned about A&M going to the SEC and Texas going to the Pac-10.
I don't think that is really the case. I'm not sure when Arkansas decided they were leaving for the SEC, but they started playing in 1992. Big 12 started playing in 1996. I think there was about a 2 year lead time between announcement of Big 12 formation and the actual transition. So I think the Arkansas courtship discussions were probably starting around 1990.I dont think BYU was considered. When the writing was on the wall for the SWC, Texas, TAMU, and Arkansas originally wanted to go together to the same conference - either the SEC or Big 8. The Texas schools started to prefer the Big 8 option but Arkansas had a lifeline to the SEC and took it. Then it was supposed to be Texas, TAMU, Tech, and Houston to the Big 12 before Texas politicians with Baylor ties weaseled them into the deal at UH’s expense.