#13 team in the country, #1 in B12... but projected 5-seed. Something seems odd there.
Playing in a tough conference helps your strength-of-schedule by whatever ranking system, your number of quality wins, and your overall efficiency on KenPom and the like, but it also means you are likely to have more losses by the end of the season.
The committee is supposed to recognize you for accepting and dealing with the challenge, but sometimes they just look at going 10-8 in the Big 12 and go "blah" and dock your seeding slightly, even if doing that is not easy given the strength of the conference.
Sometimes they just default to the number of wins sometimes.
For the record, if the tournament started today, I would expect a #4, then a #3, and then a #5 on the low side. I think any of those would be at least fair to us.
Barttovik has us the highest #4 right now...

The numbers above play out the rest of the season in the computers -- hence why Tennessee falls off the #1 line after some projected losses going forward.
Anybody want to break down the first weekend locations for the list above?
...and with the CV of a team that draws a #3 or a #4 (mostly)...
