I used the article because it answered the question. And Ku's ranking has dropped since the article was published.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have multiple sources stating that the annual funding for aTm recorded on this list is a one-time anomaly.*
The question was asked in the context of the statement preceding it, which you completely ignored.Which schools are bigger, or even come close to that? This is what you asked jbhtexas.
The report, obtained in response to an open-records request from USA TODAY Sports, showed that nearly $92 million of the total came from contributions to the athletics program. About $58.5 million of the donated funds were specifically related to Kyle Field’s redevelopment, athletics department CFO Jeff Toole said.
Throwing PC talk out the window for just a second....
The University of Houston has a total babe for a president. Helllooo, Renu Khator
Renu Khator?? Sounds like a Star Wars character name.
I have multiple sources stating that the annual funding for aTm recorded on this list is a one-time anomaly.*
*Delt4cy: "Capital project funding cycles can skew this number year over year. aTm is wrapping up a massive stadium renovation project within this cycle if I'm not mistaken. That's why their "fundraising" portion of the revenue would look particularly out sized. Just did a quick glance at the methodology-"
*Boone7247: Please see history. aTm is not historically on UT level. I believe a bunch of that revenue is for the build out of their stadium. For the 5 previous years UT avg revenue per year is $156m while aTm's is $100m. That is a pretty big gap. Also see how their costs didn't increase that significantly. That tells me there was a specific fund raising event.
Also, am I doing this correctly to avoid accusations of plagiarism?
Two fingers = Two digits = Double digits. Yep. This checks out.Whoa, this guy has nearly double-digit sources.
I understand and know that. But what I was saying is that when the Big 10 was looking at adding their 12 member to the conference, there was fear that Nebraska was going to lose their AAU status. I was just stating that some Big 10 presidents weren't on board with adding Nebraska to the conference because they felt that Nebraska was going to lose their AAU membership down the road. Ultimately, those presidents went with the flow and accepted Nebraska anyways, despite the fear of them potentially losing their AAU membership later.
![]()
I may have changed my mind about UH.
![]()
I may have changed my mind about UH.
Would.
Nope, you just flunked the fall semester of CF already.I have multiple sources stating that the annual funding for aTm recorded on this list is a one-time anomaly.*
*Delt4cy: "Capital project funding cycles can skew this number year over year. aTm is wrapping up a massive stadium renovation project within this cycle if I'm not mistaken. That's why their "fundraising" portion of the revenue would look particularly out sized. Just did a quick glance at the methodology-"
*Boone7247: Please see history. aTm is not historically on UT level. I believe a bunch of that revenue is for the build out of their stadium. For the 5 previous years UT avg revenue per year is $156m while aTm's is $100m. That is a pretty big gap. Also see how their costs didn't increase that significantly. That tells me there was a specific fund raising event.
Also, am I doing this correctly to avoid accusations of plagiarism?