I am absolutely shocked that no one has sued yet for the eligibility to play beyond the 4 or 5 years that’s allowed per “rules”
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think this exact scenario plays out more often than you you think - everyday.Sorsby: Sorry officer I know i was speeding but driving the speed limit makes me sad.
Judge: Understood, have a great day sir
Where the presidents of the universities?
That's the thing too. These schools chose to join the NCAA. There is another option, NAIA. There are different membership levels as well.
It is almost as if only one side has to honor the contract, which makes the whole thing null and void.
This stuff is beyond idiotic.
I am just saying each college president take care of their own university. The TTU president could put an end to the Sorsby nonsense. Instead he applauded it.I'm with you, but the answer is they're kind of between a rock and a hard place. You can't take a moral stand against this or that aspect of college athletics while continuing to play the game and expect to effect any changes. (While not a president, I think Pollard threaded a needle, because he didn't say anything hypocritical, he basically said "We're going to keep playing the game, but there won't be many schools left standing if guardrails aren't put in place.") I think schools like Northwestern should say to h*** with it and just focus on academics. But then there'd probably be now-wealthy alumni who ran cross country or played field hockey in an uproar about how athletics was every bit as integral to their college experience as the education they received, and they won't stand for you opting out of the circus (never mind that college athletics is completely different than it was even eight years ago, let alone when these people were playing). And even if you did opt out, as soon as you did no one would listen to your opinions of what's wrong with college athletics, because they could dismiss you as yelling from outside the club
If your point is that presidents could band together and decide to put an end to the madness, I guess that's true in theory. But how could you possibly trust that others wouldn't agree to something verbally but keep playing the game and try to squeeze you out?
I am just saying each college president take care of their own university. The TTU president could put an end to the Sorsby nonsense. Instead he applauded it.
So? If I had to do something immoral to keep my job, I would quit in a heartbeat. Or get fired. I wouldn’t stay. It used to be college presidents took stands for the common good.Because he knows if he comes out against it he will no longer be the President at Texas Tech.
I am just saying each college president take care of their own university. The TTU president could put an end to the Sorsby nonsense. Instead he applauded it.
The argument for that is a helluva lot better than the argument to allow Sorsby to play.....I am absolutely shocked that no one has sued yet for the eligibility to play beyond the 4 or 5 years that’s allowed per “rules”
So? If I had to do something immoral to keep my job, I would quit in a heartbeat. Or get fired. I wouldn’t stay. It used to be college presidents took stands for the common good.
I carry the opinion that at this point, NCAA should threaten to go home. Make an announcement that says a year from now, the NCAA is disbanding all sports and all student support systems at all divisional levels due to being legally-unable to provide an integrity-based system of athletics. Put a date on it and loudly proclaim it.It is crazy to me that the NCAA doesn’t have any control over its own entity. Making rules doesn’t matter & won’t as long as a school or athlete can sue & overturn the rule
Universities don't have presidents anymore. They have chief fundraisers.Where the presidents of the universities?