Tang gonna Tang

This was the day before the firing. Tim Fitz says Lon Kruger should help out the KSU program and help guide the selection of the next coach, but it can't be his son Kevin Kruger (followed Otz as coach at UNLV).

edit: for those that don't know, Lon Kruger played at KSU back in early 70s

 
  • Like
Reactions: OrangeCarrot
This was the day before the firing. Tim Fitz says Lon Kruger should help out the KSU program and help guide the selection of the next coach, but it can't be his son Kevin Kruger (followed Otz as coach at UNLV).

edit: for those that don't know, Lon Kruger played at KSU back in early 70s


Lon is to KSU what Gary Thompson is to ISU. hes helped ISU in like half their ISU MBB searches

minus the coaching part for Gary
 
  • Like
Reactions: dahliaclone
As others have said, the whole "for cause" issue has got to be nothing but a negotiation tactic. I believe a lot of so called for cause firings are just that, they say for cause, so they have at least an option to not immediately pay the buyout and give them a chance to negotiate something at least somewhat lower.

If they dont say for cause then they owe the entire buyout without negotiation, if they at least fire for cause they can at least try to negotiate something, and in reality even if it is just a small reduction it still is a win for them. Reducing buyout to 12-15M and extending the payout over more years saves them a lot, and that 3-6M saved means they have that much to put towards new coach etc.

That being said I think Tang will have a serious decision on whether to fight for the entire amount, which he "should" win, but you never know in court, or taking even a small reduction and riding off into the sunset.
I dont know how they would get him to take anything below 10M, unless there is more we dont know, but 12-15M probably doable.
 
As others have said, the whole "for cause" issue has got to be nothing but a negotiation tactic. I believe a lot of so called for cause firings are just that, they say for cause, so they have at least an option to not immediately pay the buyout and give them a chance to negotiate something at least somewhat lower.

If they dont say for cause then they owe the entire buyout without negotiation, if they at least fire for cause they can at least try to negotiate something, and in reality even if it is just a small reduction it still is a win for them. Reducing buyout to 12-15M and extending the payout over more years saves them a lot, and that 3-6M saved means they have that much to put towards new coach etc.

That being said I think Tang will have a serious decision on whether to fight for the entire amount, which he "should" win, but you never know in court, or taking even a small reduction and riding off into the sunset.
I dont know how they would get him to take anything below 10M, unless there is more we dont know, but 12-15M probably doable.
I wonder if Tang would have any recourse, ie damages, against KSU if it was proven that throwing the "for cause" out there caused irreparable harm to his ability to attract and obtain a new coaching position. I would think that could get very very messy for KSU.
 
They probably can't afford a serious name.
They could find a really good coach at a lower level, but knowing Taylor, they probably won’t. It will be either someone like Shane Southwell who is connected to their program (and likely cheap) or it will be someone like a Ross Hodge or Steve Lutz-type who we haven’t heard of. Could work out fine, more likely is a Prohm situation.

They can’t afford Underwood and does he really want to leave what he has at Illinois? I don’t think so.
 
I wonder if Tang would have any recourse, ie damages, against KSU if it was proven that throwing the "for cause" out there caused irreparable harm to his ability to attract and obtain a new coaching position. I would think that could get very very messy for KSU.
Oh I am sure there are many things he and his lawyers can claim, which will also be used as a negotiation tactic too.

In the end it will just depend on how far either side wants to push it, how far they take it, before some kind of settlement is reached.

I think a settlement of some sort is more likely than actually getting to court at this point.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: VeloClone and g4ce
They could find a really good coach at a lower level, but knowing Taylor, they probably won’t. It will be either someone like Shane Southwell who is connected to their program (and likely cheap) or it will be someone like a Ross Hodge or Steve Lutz-type who we haven’t heard of. Could work out fine, more likely is a Prohm situation.

They can’t afford Underwood and does he really want to leave what he has at Illinois? I don’t think so.
WRT Underwood -- KSU is a MUCH worse job than Illinois, esp how he has them going now. Always 2nd fiddle to KU, worse recruiting grounds, less money both in AD and NIL... why would he go down like 2 tiers on the desirability scale? Plus he is making bank and a half.

I agree with your 1st paragraph, it will be a "friends and family" hire.
 
As others have said, the whole "for cause" issue has got to be nothing but a negotiation tactic. I believe a lot of so called for cause firings are just that, they say for cause, so they have at least an option to not immediately pay the buyout and give them a chance to negotiate something at least somewhat lower.

If they dont say for cause then they owe the entire buyout without negotiation, if they at least fire for cause they can at least try to negotiate something, and in reality even if it is just a small reduction it still is a win for them. Reducing buyout to 12-15M and extending the payout over more years saves them a lot, and that 3-6M saved means they have that much to put towards new coach etc.

That being said I think Tang will have a serious decision on whether to fight for the entire amount, which he "should" win, but you never know in court, or taking even a small reduction and riding off into the sunset.
I dont know how they would get him to take anything below 10M, unless there is more we dont know, but 12-15M probably doable.
My guess: KSU will be able to show internal reprimand after reprimand -- including spygate -- and it will use these documented conversations to demonstrate that the Cincy game comments were the straw that broke the camel's back. In other words, it wasn't just the comments after the Cincy game.
 
WRT Underwood -- KSU is a MUCH worse job than Illinois, esp how he has them going now. Always 2nd fiddle to KU, worse recruiting grounds, less money both in AD and NIL... why would he go down like 2 tiers on the desirability scale? Plus he is making bank and a half.

I agree with your 1st paragraph, it will be a "friends and family" hire.
You just got me thinking, it will probably be the NDSU guy. He’s done fairly well there and they are having a great season this year. Was an assistant for a long time before, back to Gene Taylor’s tenure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OrangeCarrot
I wonder if Tang would have any recourse, ie damages, against KSU if it was proven that throwing the "for cause" out there caused irreparable harm to his ability to attract and obtain a new coaching position. I would think that could get very very messy for KSU.
This is what I was wondering too. If Tang beat this in court, could he potentially get a lot more than $18 million out of KSU if he counter sue’s for damages to his reputation, etc?

I definitely wouldn’t shed a tear if Tang ended up taking down KSU with him. KSU would deserve it for extending him in the first place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hoosman
Well Sheet
Fran Gone
Tang Gone

Who is at top of coaches I love to hate and hope they coach forever list?

Hurley at UCONN is so hateable but I don't want him to coach forever and we don't see them enough.
Little Hurley could state at ASU forever in my book but not super hateable.
McCollum might get there - need more time to build the hate and make sure he isn't too good.

Best chance is probably KSU screwing this hire up and bringing in a Tang jr.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron