TT Billioniare and Pay to Play Article

Amending the SBA is just asking the NFL to throw their weight around and open up Fridays and Saturdays.

The NFL and it's owners can dwarf the lobbying power that the universities have. Yormark has warned over and over that there are unintended consequences for going that route and he's running the league with the most to gain. Careful what you wish for.
 
I get it.
He's playing the game for TT.
Much as I hate it, those are the rules at this point. (Wish we had someone like that for ISU.)

That said, he's also got the ears of powerful people who could address the cancer of Collegiate sports. And as such is probably one of the only hopes to do something before every Football playoff is 16 teams, 8 from the SEC, 7 from the Big 10, and either Notre Dame or a representative from the ACC or Big XII (for show purposes only). A point at which there is no reason to care.
Being part of the problem and part of a possible solution aren't mutually exclusive.

Are any of the things CC has proposed actually going to fix the root issue of college sports? His ideas may help more equally distribute TV money (which might alleviate some of the financial bind for some schools), and perhaps his ideas could help the NIL issue. But they won't deter billionaires from pouring money into their favorite college ADs, which just furthers the arms race, and they won't stop the player money from going back underground like it was before NIL.

Is anybody actually pushing for a legally-lethal governing body for college sports that can enforce its rules and punish those who try to circumvent the system?
 
I did read the ESPN linked article. Many of the ideas that CC suggests make sense, and would probably even work well.

But Curt is correct...CC is part of the problem. He and the other billionaires that pump millions of $$$ into ADs and NIL are what create/drive the college sports arms race amongst the schools. Those type of guys have been doing the under-the-table stuff for decades (not saying CC was in any way involved in improper payments, but others have been--see the Ed Orgeron interview that was linked here recently), and it is just an order of magnitude worse now that NIL has come along.

Big difference. Campbell is young enough that he will be around to see what he anticipates to be college sports crashing.

Most of these other turds like Sankey, and the ADs and University presidents are not going to be in power, if even alive when the industry eventually collapses due to **** show that it is. These guys are all looking at a <5 year window, which hoarding as much of the pie for their own university/conference is the name of the game, whether those decisions stagnate growth or even shrink the pie.

Most people are smart enough to understand that the current one year free agency model with rules that are all exploding the gap in competitiveness and are wrecking the differentiators it has from the NFL are bad for the sport. The problem is few have enough balls or brains to make decisions that will make sure the sport is healthy in 15 years, because it might cost them 5% of their revenue next year.

All the conferences and major universities negotiating together instead of against one another would be far and away the biggest, most important step toward that direction.
 
The comparison of Campbell to Jerry Jones is appropriate...Cody is now the owner of Texas Tech.

yep. not many billionaires can afford pro sports teams anymore. its groups of billionaires. we just need to find a lonely billionaire who needs a community of drunks and slobs
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NWICY
Where’s his plan in the article. The only concrete thing I saw was the proposal to pool tv rights. Although I did skim since I wasn’t interested in reading a fluff piece about a Texas Oil billionaire
Here are links to his plans:
Here he is advocating the "Saving College Sports" legislation including rational conference realignment: https://www.savingcollegesports.com/policy

Other links from the Federalist. The Nico I commentary proposes rational geographic realignment which would optimize media revenues from pooling of rights:

 
  • Like
Reactions: JUKEBOX
Being part of the problem and part of a possible solution aren't mutually exclusive.

Are any of the things CC has proposed actually going to fix the root issue of college sports? His ideas may help more equally distribute TV money (which might alleviate some of the financial bind for some schools), and perhaps his ideas could help the NIL issue. But they won't deter billionaires from pouring money into their favorite college ADs, which just furthers the arms race, and they won't stop the player money from going back underground like it was before NIL.

Is anybody actually pushing for a legally-lethal governing body for college sports that can enforce its rules and punish those who try to circumvent the system?
So how exactly do you propose limitations on how much money can be individually donated to a college AD?

And your last question is addressed by codifying the terms of the House Settlement at the Fed level that would provide enforcement powers by the CSC and/or NCAA, presumably with subpoena powers.
 
Here are links to his plans:
Here he is advocating the "Saving College Sports" legislation including rational conference realignment: https://www.savingcollegesports.com/policy

Other links from the Federalist. The Nico I commentary proposes rational geographic realignment which would optimize media revenues from pooling of rights:

I agree with him for the most part, and that's the same conclusion I've come to. There needs to be massive reform to fix the sport because I don't think it will sustain itself as-is. I've already mostly checked out of games that aren't Iowa State or Big 12.

Hopefully there's some more progress on the legislation proposal.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 2Xclone and cyputz
I did read the ESPN linked article. Many of the ideas that CC suggests make sense, and would probably even work well.

But Curt is correct...CC is part of the problem. He and the other billionaires that pump millions of $$$ into ADs and NIL are what create/drive the college sports arms race amongst the schools. Those type of guys have been doing the under-the-table stuff for decades (not saying CC was in any way involved in improper payments, but others have been--see the Ed Orgeron interview that was linked here recently), and it is just an order of magnitude worse now that NIL has come along.
I think he's proposing reform in the governance of college sports to ensure economic and competitive parity as well rather than the system we have now.
 
Well, it looks like the Cody Campbell ball-gargling has broken containment.
 
Being part of the problem and part of a possible solution aren't mutually exclusive.

Are any of the things CC has proposed actually going to fix the root issue of college sports? His ideas may help more equally distribute TV money (which might alleviate some of the financial bind for some schools), and perhaps his ideas could help the NIL issue. But they won't deter billionaires from pouring money into their favorite college ADs, which just furthers the arms race, and they won't stop the player money from going back underground like it was before NIL.

Is anybody actually pushing for a legally-lethal governing body for college sports that can enforce its rules and punish those who try to circumvent the system?
Is there a legal governing body for college sports? Not if no one acknowledges any authority they may or may not possess or impose. The NCAA is just a name, nothing more.
 
I am going to assume you didn't bother to read the linked ESPN story.

Unfortunately, it is going to take Fed intervention to fix college sports, namely CFB, and Campbell is the guy to lead the bi-partisan efforts in doing so. If the he and the Feds are unsuccessful in doing so, ISU faces the real possibility of being financially relegated and destroyed at the end of the decade like Washington St and Oregon St already have. What he is proposing as the "fix" makes total sense and the ones who will fight him the most are ESPN and Fox and their respective puppets, Sankey and Petitti:

Pass a version of the combined SCORE/STAR Acts that would:
-Amend the 1961 Sports Broadcasting Act to enable media rights pooling that would at least double media revenues for all of FBS
-Grant a limited anti-trust exemption that would enable codification/enforcement of the House Settlement and provide the NCAA to enable/enforce its own transfer and eligibility rules without getting sued.

Then beyond that, Campbell has rightfully proposed rational geographic realignment that would split up the top brand programs into 7 10-team conferences amongst the existing P4. This would optimize revenue generation from media rights pooling with an NFL-style bidding process. Media revenues are obviously stifled now by ESPN/Fox due to their control of SEC and B10 rights for the foreseeable future and probable plans for additional brand consolidation to those two conferences. Nothing reflects the current idiocy and intentional revenue compression moreso than ESPN being the sole bidder of CFP rights and then sublicensing CFP games that conflict with the NFL in order to make money for their sole benefit.

Campbell has openly admitted he had the financial resources prior to the House Settlement to take advantage of pay for play for TT prior to the House Cap and has also stated multiple times the House Settlement needs to be codified for the long term benefit of college sports.

I didn't need to read the article because I've heard him talk about it before.

IMO the solution is simple but no one wants to take the reigns.

The U.S. Congress needs to act to clean up the mess and here are the things they need to do in order to get it under control (I was brainstorming this ideas while driving around from client to client today):

Governance:
- Congress needs to pass a law allocating the administration of college sports specifically to the NCAA
- As part of this they give the NCAA investigative, audit and enforcement powers to regulate intercollegiate athletics.
- By signing up to play intercollegiate athletics you are agreeing to follow the rules in place and accept the punishment for not adhering to the rules.
- The NCAA incorporates NIL audit ability for student athletes and audit ability of Athletic Departments.
- Penalties will be established and well known for rule breakers.

Revenue Sharing:
- Each member institution is required to provide at least $5M but not to exceed $12M of revenue sharing to the University's student athletes.
- The allocation by sport is at the discretion of the University, but the payments for a specific sport are equal to all participants. Example - University allocates $10M to football that is divided by the total number of football players (scholarship and walkons equally).

NIL:
- NIL is allowed but not under the guise of pay to play.
- NIL opportunities MUST come from IRS and State registered businesses that adhere to the tax laws under the United States Internal Revenue Service Code.
- All NIL will have required tax documents filed (1099's, personal and business tax returns filed timely and in full).
- Athletes will be required to submit required NIL documents to an NCAA Dashboard (Contract for the NIL, Method of Payments, Purpose of NIL, Business information - state registered, EIN, company contact, etc)
- Athletes will be required to submit a copy their filed tax return to their NIL Dashboard - The NCAA audit power will allow them to compare the provided tax return to the tax return filed with the IRS similar to when banks compare a tax return from a bank customer to what the IRS has on file.
- No NIL payments from individuals are allowed.

Eligibility:
- We return to the standard eligibility rules.
- Eligibility clock starts once the student athlete has your first day of college class.
- Signing of any United States based professional contract in your sport ends your eligibility. Ex. College BB player will not be eligible once they sign a NBA contract. But a college football player that has a MLB contract would still be eligible for college football, but not college baseball.
- JUCO starts your eligibility clock.

Transfers:
- Each student athlete is allowed one, no penalty transfer to a different institution. Any transfer above this one free transfer and not outlined as an exception below will result in 1 sit out year.
- In the case of a coaching change, student athlete will be allowed to transfer without it counting towards their one free transfer.
- Grad transfers are allowed even after the student athlete has used their one free transfer.
- Transfer Portal - The transfer portal will be open for 2 periods during the year based on a sport specific schedule (Some lesser sports will have one portal period). Football for example - Period 1 - Jan 2 - January 14 and Period 2 - May 15 - June 15

Scholarships and Team Limits:
- Scholarship limits will revert the to historical limits - ex. FB 85 scholarships
- No cap on team size but see revenue sharing section regarding payments for ALL team members.

Agents:
- Only licensed agents may represent a student athlete with the exception that the student athlete's legal guardian can also represent them without being a licensed agent.
- Only can be represented by ONE person - Must register that representative with the NCAA and the University


I am sure I forgot some things, but I think this a good start.

I am open to comments and suggestions.
 
@isufbcurt with so many complaining about the lack of oversight of the current NCAA powers. How does said group become accountable?
 
After several hundred copy-paste posts on this topic, many like me here are ******* tired of it.
Given the state of CFB and other college sports, there will be plenty of future posts on the topic and you'll need to grow up and deal with it or ignore them.
 
I didn't need to read the article because I've heard him talk about it before.

IMO the solution is simple but no one wants to take the reigns.

The U.S. Congress needs to act to clean up the mess and here are the things they need to do in order to get it under control (I was brainstorming this ideas while driving around from client to client today):

Governance:
- Congress needs to pass a law allocating the administration of college sports specifically to the NCAA
- As part of this they give the NCAA investigative, audit and enforcement powers to regulate intercollegiate athletics.
- By signing up to play intercollegiate athletics you are agreeing to follow the rules in place and accept the punishment for not adhering to the rules.
- The NCAA incorporates NIL audit ability for student athletes and audit ability of Athletic Departments.
- Penalties will be established and well known for rule breakers.

Revenue Sharing:
- Each member institution is required to provide at least $5M but not to exceed $12M of revenue sharing to the University's student athletes.
- The allocation by sport is at the discretion of the University, but the payments for a specific sport are equal to all participants. Example - University allocates $10M to football that is divided by the total number of football players (scholarship and walkons equally).

NIL:
- NIL is allowed but not under the guise of pay to play.
- NIL opportunities MUST come from IRS and State registered businesses that adhere to the tax laws under the United States Internal Revenue Service Code.
- All NIL will have required tax documents filed (1099's, personal and business tax returns filed timely and in full).
- Athletes will be required to submit required NIL documents to an NCAA Dashboard (Contract for the NIL, Method of Payments, Purpose of NIL, Business information - state registered, EIN, company contact, etc)
- Athletes will be required to submit a copy their filed tax return to their NIL Dashboard - The NCAA audit power will allow them to compare the provided tax return to the tax return filed with the IRS similar to when banks compare a tax return from a bank customer to what the IRS has on file.
- No NIL payments from individuals are allowed.

Eligibility:
- We return to the standard eligibility rules.
- Eligibility clock starts once the student athlete has your first day of college class.
- Signing of any United States based professional contract in your sport ends your eligibility. Ex. College BB player will not be eligible once they sign a NBA contract. But a college football player that has a MLB contract would still be eligible for college football, but not college baseball.
- JUCO starts your eligibility clock.

Transfers:
- Each student athlete is allowed one, no penalty transfer to a different institution. Any transfer above this one free transfer and not outlined as an exception below will result in 1 sit out year.
- In the case of a coaching change, student athlete will be allowed to transfer without it counting towards their one free transfer.
- Grad transfers are allowed even after the student athlete has used their one free transfer.
- Transfer Portal - The transfer portal will be open for 2 periods during the year based on a sport specific schedule (Some lesser sports will have one portal period). Football for example - Period 1 - Jan 2 - January 14 and Period 2 - May 15 - June 15

Scholarships and Team Limits:
- Scholarship limits will revert the to historical limits - ex. FB 85 scholarships
- No cap on team size but see revenue sharing section regarding payments for ALL team members.

Agents:
- Only licensed agents may represent a student athlete with the exception that the student athlete's legal guardian can also represent them without being a licensed agent.
- Only can be represented by ONE person - Must register that representative with the NCAA and the University


I am sure I forgot some things, but I think this a good start.

I am open to comments and suggestions.
Your suggestions for Governance, NIL and Agents essentially mirror those of Campbell's.
 
@isufbcurt with so many complaining about the lack of oversight of the current NCAA powers. How does said group become accountable?

See the Governance section - Congress gives them the authority similar to how the Iowa Legislature has given the authority to the Iowa boys and girls high school associations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyputz
Given the state of CFB and other college sports, there will be plenty of future posts on the topic and you'll need to grow up and deal with it or ignore them.

Grow up? Me?

You're the one who's pinned all of your hopes and dreams to one guy's plan to strong-arm Congress and all of the power brokers into doing **** they absolutely don't want to do.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: 1UNI2ISU

Help Support Us

Become a patron