IHSAA/IGHSAU are not going to waste time worrying about who's winning conference titles. Schools and conferences have the ability to do what they think is best for themselves.
Other than football, everybody makes the postseason in every sport. So the classification is the only thing that matters.
I'm not sure if it is wasting time since they are already determining districts for football. Whether it's applying the same criteria, or modifying it much, it seems pretty straightforward.
While this is not an important factor really, seeding and hosting are dependent on results, and that keeps getting harder when you have all these frankenstein conferences that cross over three classes.
Whether it's the associations or someone else, right now we have a bunch of conferences in the state that need a reset. Enrollments, consolidations and closures have changed so much that now we have conferences that suck both in terms of travel and school size. While school size doesn't guarantee competitiveness, it's a pretty good correlator that the associations obviously do concern themselves with.
I don't expect them to care who wins conference titles. I do expect them to care that you have some terrible competitive balance (in at least some large part due to enrollment variances) and travel for a lot of conferences. That leads to a worse experience (or reduction in participation) for HS student athletes, which speaks to their entire purpose.
There's no way to make it perfect, or maybe even great, particularly in the rural areas. But it could be a hell of a lot better both in terms of getting a better match in school size and travel. But the only way to do it would be to blow it up and start over. Instead it's a bunch of incremental moves from conferences that made sense a long time ago, and no longer do.