Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

FerShizzle

person slash genius
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 5, 2013
16,059
19,980
113
Des Moines

so about this...

they cant really do this without a baseline of a signed media deal and GOR. and they are now completely going back to the square one with their media deal if they are changing the teams involved. the same media deal they have been working on for over a year.

i just dont see either the current schools being willing to reset these negotiations or prospective schools wanting to sign on to this uncertainty.
 

Cloneon

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2015
3,000
3,135
113
West Virginia
If you think that is a sign of mass grass roots support for their athletics from faculty, students, & alumni instead of meaning they have some wealthy alumni who like athletics, I don't know what to tell you.
$36 mil doesn't get you much in CA compared to IA. When I lived there the cost to renovate Cal's stadium was off the charts ... and that was 20 years ago.
 

jcyclonee

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
23,262
26,176
113
Minneapolis
I love that he’s saying “this school will surprise you.” None of the PAC12 schools will be surprising because of course all of them want to get off a sinking ship.

The only way it would be surprising is if a team not currently in the PAC12 joins the PAC12 for a day and then joins the Big 12.
Stanford would be a bit of a surprise but, yes, I agree with your general idea.
 

laminak

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2010
6,698
10,363
113
Marion
I love that he’s saying “this school will surprise you.” None of the PAC12 schools will be surprising because of course all of them want to get off a sinking ship.

The only way it would be surprising is if a team not currently in the PAC12 joins the PAC12 for a day and then joins the Big 12.

Cal, Stanford, OreSt, and WSU would surprise me, for different reasons.
 

aeroclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2006
10,365
7,183
113
I love that he’s saying “this school will surprise you.” None of the PAC12 schools will be surprising because of course all of them want to get off a sinking ship.

The only way it would be surprising is if a team not currently in the PAC12 joins the PAC12 for a day and then joins the Big 12.
I think WAOR would be considered a surprise since the B12 narrative has always been focused on the four corners with the assumption that WAOR was B1G bound.
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,625
23,880
113
Macomb, MI
Uconn is NOT a "fringe blueblood."
That is the midwestern bias/perspective coming in, which is why we need Uconn and the NE market.

Uconn has won more national titles since 1999 (5) than Kansas, KY, Duke, and UNC.

Calling Uconn a fringe blueblood is akin to calling Bama a fringe blueblood in football.

Everyone keeps bringing up Rutgers/B1G as a reason for adding UConn to the Big XII. The thing is I don’t think there’s a bigger case of buyer’s remorse anywhere in realignment than the Big 10 has with Rutgers. All I ever hear up here in Michigan is how Rutgers doesn’t fit culturally or competitively, and how it didn’t add the NYC market the way everyone thought it would (stunner). All i ever hear about up here is if the Big 10 could undo one decision it would be Rutgers.
 

jcyclonee

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
23,262
26,176
113
Minneapolis
I will never understand this boner for adding UConn. Yeah, they’re good at basketball - and yet it’s football that matters and nobody gives 2 ***** about UConn football. Plus UConn decreases every school’s take, whereas PAC 12 schools don’t.
UConn is a BY thing. I think that he sees future growth in basketball while football will remain a bit stagnant. It fits well if he's trying to grow internationally as bball is more popular internationally. I guess I'm not sure if it's more popular in Mexico.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Gunnerclone

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron