**** Iowa

Cyclones_R_GR8

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 10, 2007
23,947
25,936
113
Omaha
vvdbTayS1S-iowa.gif
 

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
26,459
19,620
113
Our seeding. Sounds like you are going off the premise that you think we will be on the bubble?

I think we win on Thursday. If we don't, I think it's entirely possible we're a bubble team.

We could lose and still make the tourney they would just overplay my expectations for the conference.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: isu2014

CyTwins

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2010
80,179
65,792
113
Ankeny
2005. I know. It's possible for someone to have the same information you do but a different opinion.

We've had the best defensive team we've had in over a decade but yet seem like we can be a bubble team. I guess I don't understand your thought process on this
 

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
26,459
19,620
113
We've had the best defensive team we've had in over a decade but yet seem like we can be a bubble team. I guess I don't understand your thought process on this

I outlined it many times. I don't thing I'm being unclear. I think we get swept by KU and BU. I hope I'm completely wrong. If I'm not, and what the RPI wizard says is true, then we'll have an RPI in the 40s, and that puts most teams on the bubble.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: isu2014

CyTwins

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2010
80,179
65,792
113
Ankeny
I outlined it many times. I don't thing I'm being unclear. I think we get swept by KU and BU. I hope I'm completely wrong. If I'm not, and what the RPI wizard says is true, then we'll have an RPI in the 40s, and that puts most teams on the bubble.

When was the last time we lost 3 homes in one year?
 

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,594
79,854
113
DSM
I outlined it many times. I don't thing I'm being unclear. I think we get swept by KU and BU. I hope I'm completely wrong. If I'm not, and what the RPI wizard says is true, then we'll have an RPI in the 40s, and that puts most teams on the bubble.

Top-50 Finishes are Key
Since the 1999-2000 season, just 70 teams with a top-50 RPI come Selection Sunday have missed the NCAA Tournament. That's just nine percent of all teams in that stretch with a top-50 RPI, or an average of 4.4 teams per season missing. It's also heavily influenced by a weird two-year stretch (2006 and 2007) where 16 top-50 teams missed the Big Dance. You may recognize one of them immediately. In 2007, Syracuse had an RPI of 50 and a SOS of 2, yet were famously left out. Outside of that two-year stretch, the average was just 3.4.

Top-40s are Even Better
All top-50 profiles were also not created equal. Those top-50 teams that have been left out were largely (67 percent) rated 41-50. That doesn't mean they were less worthy of a Tourney bid because of that slightly lower rating. But there's a slight correlation to be made between where you fall in that spectrum and your guarantees to get an invite. Some of the more notable exceptions to that theory, however: 2006 Missouri State (21), 2015 Colorado State (29), 2007 Air Force (30) and 2006 Hofstra (30). Those four teams have something in common, however...

Power Conferences Still Have an Advantage
The four top-30 teams left out above were all in non-power leagues. And that's indicative of the larger trend throughout the entire 16-year stretch we're looking at. Just 36 percent of the top-50 RPI teams left out of the NCAAs were in a power conference (meaning 64 percent were in non-power leagues). If that sounds like a closer comparison than you'd think, then look instead at the recent seasons from 2008 through 2015. In that stretch, just three power conference teams were left out, vs. 25 non-power teams. So despite non-power teams seemingly gaining more success in the actual tournament results, the standards for them participating have never been higher.

The last top-50 RPI ACC team to miss the NCAA Tournament was all the way back in 2006-07, when Florida State's SOS of 94 stopped them from being selected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CyTwins

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
26,459
19,620
113
Good point gunner. I've not seen that. Certainly possible I'm overestimating the risk.
 

BillBrasky4Cy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 10, 2013
17,479
31,790
113
Let me explain something to you. Um, I am not "Mr. Lebowski". You're Mr. Lebowski. I'm the Dude. So that's what you call me. You know, that or, uh, His Dudeness, or uh, Duder, or El Duderino if you're not into the whole **** Iowa thing. upload_2016-12-6_15-40-11.png
 

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
26,459
19,620
113
So Bryce thought Iowa was a tourney team before the season and now ISU could be a bubble team.

Why don't you go quote the 1,000 posts you had before the season about how this team would suck on defense.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: isu2014

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
26,459
19,620
113
Ohhhhhh....this thread is turnt on now!

I was wrong about Iowa. I was wrong about BU. I was wrong about the election. I've been wrong about many things.

You were wrong about Iowa States defense. Apparently me being wrong about Iowa means I'm an idiot, and you being wrong about our defense (and being a **** about it the whole time) means absolutely nothing.

I think I've said my piece here.
 
Last edited:
  • Funny
Reactions: isu2014

rholtgraves

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2009
11,201
6,751
113
There is definitely a chance they don't have a good RPI this year as last year and that they get seeded lower because of it but I don't think that makes them a bubble team.