***2026-27 Mens College Basketball Thread***

And I have a hunch it was structured that way to open the possibility of eventual expansion, like a "test case" (a step set initially when it expanded to 65 in 2001(?), although I think that happened because # of leagues increased so the power teams felt it needed to maintain the then-current at-large slot).

It was almost like a compromise that kept the basic 64 framework w/ lowest auto-bids at 16, and "narrowly miss" at-larges in 11-seed area.

If four more at-large wannabes are added, moving it to 72, it'll shove all the lowest auto bids onto 16 line (so we'll have a First 8 split between 16 and the current at-large lines).

I realize that's probably not the most well-constructed analysis, hopefully it makes some sense.
I went to the Opening Round Game in 2005 and the First Four 4 times @ Dayton! They really rolled out the red carpet for both events, and I really enjoyed going. First Four was always cool with an AQ game and an at-large game. I have no issue with that setup. NCAA Tournament Basketball is FUN!
 
Ain’t going to lie it’s probably not the end of the world if we lose a respectable game tomorrow. Legs are going to be burning after tomorrow and then a Saturday game.
Would be like playing 4 ncaa games in 4 days againt like a 13, 4, 1 and 2 seed
 
Ain’t going to lie it’s probably not the end of the world if we lose a respectable game tomorrow. Legs are going to be burning after tomorrow and then a Saturday game.
Would be like playing 4 ncaa games in 4 days againt like a 13, 4, 1 and 2 seed
Definitely not end of the world, but if you can beat AZ and Houston/KU, you cement yourself as a 2 seed
 
Definitely not end of the world, but if you can beat AZ and Houston/KU, you cement yourself as a 2 seed
Not a huge fan of Lunardi, but he always tends to undercut us a bit, and even he moved us to a 2 after the win today. The metrics have really swayed us to a 2 with these last 3 blowout wins.
 
Not a huge fan of Lunardi, but he always tends to undercut us a bit, and even he moved us to a 2 after the win today. The metrics have really swayed us to a 2 with these last 3 blowout wins.

This shouldn't bear repeating but he's low ranked among bracketologists.

He's a residual cartoon character like the NFL draft guy who talks like he's trying to sell us a a beat up Buick.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BigCyFan