• Fanatics -

    Thank you for your patience today and welcome to the newest version of Cyclone Fanatic!

    Most of the changes we have made are very simple, but will greatly improve your user experience while visiting the website.

    We have upgraded our forum software to speed things up. Our homepage is much cleaner and should be even more mobile friendly than before.

    We appreciate your loyalty and are committed to not only keeping Cyclone Fanatic in tip-top shape, but continuing to build this community for the next decade and beyond.

    We ask that if you are experiences any glitches to let us know in this thread . Will will be diligently working on the site all day.

    Thanks again.

    Chris Williams - Publisher
Football

Don’t punt: Dr. Woody on Baylor’s ridiculous offense

On Saturday, Iowa State will wake up in the paradise of Waco to play the second-ranked team in the country, one week after playing the No. 3 team in the country.

Playing the second-ranked team in the country is rough, but you just have to execute your normal gameplan to perfection in order to compete in the game, right? Not there. Not in Waco. Not against Baylor. You have to wholly reshape your gameplan and then execute that new gameplan to perfection. I could talk until I’m blue in the face about what to do against this team, but the more amazing question is why you have to do this?

Iowa State head football coach Paul Rhoads drew criticism in the TCU game for punting on 4th and 3 from the +45. Fans (myself included) thought that going for it would be a better option against a team that potent. But fans (myself included) always love going for it on 4th down. To understand why coaches punt, we have to take a look at math.

When I first got to Iowa State, the offensive and special teams staff showed us a chart to emphasize the importance of field position. It looked something like this, which is from footballoutsiders.com:

56294dc12166f3b9cc0e

This may seem like a lot to process it is actually very simple. The numbers on the x-axis (the bottom, horizontal line) are how far away from the endzone a drive starts. This means that if the ball was kicked through the end zone on a kickoff, it would be a data point at 75, since it starts on the -25 yard line. The y-axis (the vertical axis) is the percent of those drives that end in touchdowns. This chart is from a national average in 2006, but stats today are roughly the same. Predictably, drives that start closer to the end zone are more likely to end in touchdowns. Why punt, then? If you can effectively pin the opponent inside the 20, the opposing team goes from having a 50% likelihood of scoring a touchdown to around 15%. So what does this have to do with Baylor?

Before I get there, I want to preface the rest of the article with some stats from Cyclone Fanatic’s Brent Blum.

  • Baylor averages almost 64 points per game. Iowa State hasn’t scored more than 50 in regulation in any game dating back to 2012 when they put 51 on Kansas.

  • Baylor has gained more than 640 yards in EVERY GAME this season. Iowa State has done that twice in school history.

  • Baylor averages 720 yards per game, which is 70 yards more than the highest total in Iowa State history.

  • Baylor WR Corey Coleman has 16 touchdown receptions on the year. Baylor has punted only 12 times.

Now that you have context, Iowa State must change its philosophy (as does every other team that plays the Bears). The drive chart for Baylor is INSANE. (compiled by @justusezekial on twitter)

56294dc12199a85a6b27e

Let’s dive into this for a second.

The national average for scoring touchdowns on drives that start on the 25 (so the distance after a touchback) is roughly 20 percent. Baylor? Try 83 percent!!

They are FOUR TIMES more likely to score touchdowns on average-length possessions. How about long fields – drives that start inside the 10, so 90 yards. National average? About 10 percent. Baylor, 43 percent.

Here’s something to chew on: Based on mathematics, a Baylor drive starting inside of 60 yards has nearly the same odds to end in a touchdown (89 percent) as an average NFL kicker hitting an extra point this year (93 percent via NFL.com). Let that sink in for a second. No matter how you parse this out, Baylor is exponentially better than average.

What does this mean? It means your entire gameplan has to change. Punting gains you a minimal advantage, if any at all. Unless you are 100 percent sure can pin them inside of the 10, the mathematical benefit of punting is gone. In short, there is no point in punting, especially if the 4th down distance is inside of five yards. On top of that, they are going to score touchdowns on atminimumevery other drive, so ISU will have to do everything in its power to keep them off the field.

Iowa State is staring down the barrel of a rocket launcher. The only way to stop them is to prevent them from pulling the trigger. Their gameplan has to be wholly different. Convention won’t beat them. Aggressive down and distance calls will keep them off the field. Execution and points on nearly every drive will allow you to stay in the game. A perfect game will allow you the chanceto win. Baylor mistakes on top of a perfect game make way for a victory, but the statistics say that’s not likely.

J

Jeff Woody

contributor