It's frustrating but Snyder always seems to find a way to run the ball effectively.We stacked the box against KSU last year and Dan Thomas still had a million yards.
It's frustrating but Snyder always seems to find a way to run the ball effectively.We stacked the box against KSU last year and Dan Thomas still had a million yards.
FIFY
Texas.... again. Just because Mack Brown got rid of nearly his entire coaching staff doesn't mean the players are going to play much better.
Based on the commentary I have heard from hawk fans on Vandenberg compared to Stanzi I stick by my original statement. I was amazed how hard they were throwing Stanzi under the bus. Sure the kid wasn't anything special but he wasn't a dud by any stretch.
Baylor, even if RGIII stays healthy there will be something else that goes wrong. Wanted to vote for K-State but their latest batch of transfers that can play kept me from doing it. A&M may as well, after Arkansas puts another beatdown on them at Jerry World in Dallas, their mojo may take a hit.
They may also re-consider their SEC dreams that day as well.
I don't throw him under the bus, but I certainly have said that I do not think he is an NFL QB. Good college QB, sure. But not NFL. I may be wrong, but what's new?
I am a Chiefs fan so he better not be a bust in the NFL. :realmad:
Chiefs fan too ... my nightmare: Stanzi and Moeaki for the next 10 years.I am a Chiefs fan so he better not be a bust in the NFL. :realmad:
Picked Mizzou, but would have picked Iowa if on there.
Stanzi, Clayborn, Ballard, Klug, Vandervelde, Sash, Greenwood, Reisner, Hunter, & Coke-head are gone.
Vandenberg could easily pull a Jake Christensen. Has 1 good game, 1 terrible game, & 1 game where he was a non-factor on his resume.
Coker will not make it thru the whole season at 75% or more of the team's carries. Will get injured if this is the case. Backup RBs will be freshmen.
Receiving corps is McNutt, then ? Iowa's TEs are most effective when the team can run & throw to the outside. Take away the run & McNutt, & I'd make the TEs beat me by having to have double digit receptions/game.
Defense has all kinds of ?s - LB core was decimated last year by injuries. 2 returning DBs are solid, but 1 is changing positions to S (Hyde). Are the 2 coming back actually that good, our were they able to make plays because of the players surrounding them last year? DL changes already mentioned.
Yeah, yeah, Iowa has 'talent' coming up, but to say there will not be a significant drop-off somewhere is not realistic in my mind.
So in order of popularity, it looks like A&M is running away with it. Little surprised at how confident people are in OSU and KSU.
Kansas State 2 3.17%
Oklahoma 2 3.17%
Oklahoma State 2 3.17%
Iowa State 3 4.76%
Baylor 4 6.35%
Kansas 5 7.94%
Texas Tech 6 9.52%
Missouri 8 12.70%
Texas 10 15.87%
Texas A&M 21 33.33%
I think it is hard for people to think that KSU will "tank" because no one expects them to be great. they are predicted to be middle of the pack so they just dont have far to fall.
I dont see OSU tanking unless weeden/Blackmon gets hurt and even then they MIGHT be ok.
I think ATM is so high because they are getting so much hype.
I think it is hard for people to think that KSU will "tank" because no one expects them to be great. they are predicted to be middle of the pack so they just dont have far to fall.
I dont see OSU tanking unless weeden/Blackmon gets hurt and even then they MIGHT be ok.
I think ATM is so high because they are getting so much hype.
I am a Chiefs fan so he better not be a bust in the NFL. :realmad: