Agreed. My guy on the staff felt they feel good if you find 2 studs each year, but one of those early years they felt they went 80-100%. This group knows how to recruit, but for some reason Manning and Meyers didn't develop like they needed. This is why I hold a lot of optimism with the new staff.How does this show that recruiting failed and player development/coaching didn't? Because a recruit didn't end up contributing? That doesn't automatically mean they were a bad recruit. The '16 OL might have been a bunch of hidden gems with potential to start in the Big 12 but were torpedoed by bad coaching. How would we know?