Why OL Development Has Lagged Behind

stateofmind

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2007
6,635
4,174
113
Ankeny
How does this show that recruiting failed and player development/coaching didn't? Because a recruit didn't end up contributing? That doesn't automatically mean they were a bad recruit. The '16 OL might have been a bunch of hidden gems with potential to start in the Big 12 but were torpedoed by bad coaching. How would we know?
Agreed. My guy on the staff felt they feel good if you find 2 studs each year, but one of those early years they felt they went 80-100%. This group knows how to recruit, but for some reason Manning and Meyers didn't develop like they needed. This is why I hold a lot of optimism with the new staff.
 

cyatheart

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 18, 2008
9,435
6,943
113
49
It doesn’t matter in this case….the same guys recruited and developed these guys. Either they sucked at recruiting or they couldn’t coach. You have to do both. They didn’t do one or both. Either way they failed.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: bozclone

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,878
13,958
113
Recrutiing, development, and scheme are not mutually exclusive root causes to the OL struggles.

Personally, I would put it at 10/70/20. Those recruits didn't pan out, but I put a lot of that on the development issues because imho many of them flashed good initially (e.g. Simmons, Remsberg, Miller), and then seemed to regress after they got MORE time in the system. That's the absolute opposite of how OL should work.