What is Adam Woodbury's problem?

[88clone]

This guy watches a lot of People's Court.

Is that you, Rusty?

 

[isulive2train]

Yes, I was the plaintiff. Chicks never have been able to keep their hands off me.

So you have mistresses?

 

[88clone]

Again, prove it.

Prove it again? How many times do I need to prove it? Sheesh!

 

[CycloneRulzzz]

What else do you expect from Poke U?

Iowa Pokeyes

 

[88clone]

HIS WIFE SAID SO, AND SHES A LAWYER!

If a lawyer's word isn't good enough for you, who should you ask?

Like, if I have a leaky roof, should I go talk to a preacher?

 

[3TrueFans]

Prove it again? How many times do I need to prove it? Sheesh!

Let's start with one and then we'll see how we're all feeling.

 

[michaelrr1]

Prove it again? How many times do I need to prove it? Sheesh!

I'm still waiting for the first time.

 

[88clone]

So you have mistresses?

Yes, a Serta and a Sleep Number.

 

[isulive2train]

If a lawyer's word isn't good enough for you, who should you ask?

Like, if I have a leaky roof, should I go talk to a preacher?

You sound like you need some "flex seal" for that roof. Church!

 

[88clone]

I'm still waiting for the first time.

But you said to prove it again! Anyway, he's what they call in the world of law a habitual offender, which means removes the question of whether or not it's deliberate, when it comes to injury being caused.

 

[3TrueFans]

But you said to prove it again! Anyway, he's what they call in the world of law a habitual offender, which means removes the question of whether or not it's deliberate, when it comes to injury being caused.

There was no injury caused. Boom, case closed. Who's buying lunch?

 

[isulive2train]

Yes, a Serta and a Sleep Number.

Are you the defendant or the plaintiff behind closed doors? Do you get a little wild and throw in a jury from time to time?

 

[chuckd4735]

If a lawyer's word isn't good enough for you, who should you ask?

Like, if I have a leaky roof, should I go talk to a preacher?

I just called my uncle who is a judge, and he said your wife is wrong. He said that if your wife ever brought a case like this forward with the sole premise of "he did it 3 times in 2 weeks" to prove intent, he would throw it out with prejudice.

 

[88clone]

There was no injury caused. Boom, case closed. Who's buying lunch?

Doesn't have to be injury, just an attempt to injure or an injurious offense was committed. Lunch? Order in the court!

 

[cycloneG]

There was no injury caused. Boom, case closed. Who's buying lunch?

This thread has injured more people than woodbury

 

[88clone]

I just called my uncle who is a judge, and he said your wife is wrong. He said that if your wife ever brought a case like this forward with the sole premise of "he did it 3 times in 2 weeks" to prove intent, he would throw it out with prejudice.

Sure you did. My wife said to ask him about recidivism. That'll shut up your fictitious uncle.

 

[isulive2train]

I just called my uncle who is a judge, and he said your wife is wrong. He said that if your wife ever brought a case like this forward with the sole premise of "he did it 3 times in 2 weeks" to prove intent, he would throw it out with prejudice.

Damn, if it went to the judge I'd dismiss w/o prejudice and rethink my outrageous claim.

 

[GTO]

Did someone say prostitutes?

Is that you, Greg Anthony? Warren Sapp?

 

[chuckd4735]

Sure you did. My wife said to ask him about recidivism. That'll shut up your fictitious uncle.

How has Woodbury relapsed into criminal behavior?

 

[michaelrr1]

But you said to prove it again! Anyway, he's what they call in the world of law a habitual offender, which means removes the question of whether or not it's deliberate, when it comes to injury being caused.

Wrong. I said " Again, prove it" which has quite a different meaning than prove it again. I guess you don't understand English as well as you thought you did.

Furthermore, you are the one claiming it was "deliberate" and "intentional". When challenged on that point, you are now backing down. Case closed.