I disagree only because it'd be really easy for someone to just go out and say "no that isn't what happened, we got called". Very easy to call the bluff. I agree with the other poster it was likely about what should've been a call of a flagrant when Joens got hit. I'd be surprised if it was about a call that the officials called in our favor, even after a lengthy review. It does say a few things, so maybe both of them were discussed.Assume he must have complained or called about something. They aren't talking "calls" but "administration" of something. Can't really think of anything that would warrant a statement regarding "administration". Maybe the late review of the hand hitting Audi in the face but that more a late call and not really administration. If you watch much WBB basketball at all you have seen that sort of call a bunch and a lot of the time it's WAY after the incident. I don't like the going back in time for reviewing a missed call. If they miss it they miss it. Not the same as stopping play with an immediate call and than reviewing to see if they got it right.
Sounds a lot like Fennelly being his old passive aggressive self and amping up the fan base victim mentality that we are always being cheated on. It's as tiresome as it is timeless with him.
And not addressing you, but just in general on this whole situation. I fall somewhere between "the refs were bad enough that we lost because of them" on a technical note - there was enough that didn't get called/got called wrong, that technically we probably would've come out ahead, but also that we made more than enough mistakes to doom us on our own. At some point for officials to get better, they are going to have to receive pushback on things like what happened in the game. We can't just keep letting them off with "oh that's how WBB is officiated". That may be the case, but we cannot let that become the standard.