To, Too, Two early.
Oof! I know that and still missed it.
To, Too, Two early.
Rutgers. Kansas even waxed them a few years back.
1. OU - best
2. OSU - talent and coaching
3. UT - talent
4. Baylor - offense improves enough to help defense
5. WVU - similar to baylor
6. ISU - bright lights too bright
7. TCU - at least better than bottom 3
8. KSU
9. TTU
10. Kansas
I think 3-6 are all going to be close.
Thats sad for the the Michigan teams.Rutgers didn't finish in last this year. They actually finished ahead of Michigan and Michigan St.
OU will be losing their most veteran wide receiver in Rambo to the transfer portal. Not much of a big deal due to the talent they bring in year in and year out.
1. OU - best
2. OSU - talent and coaching
3. UT - talent
4. Baylor - offense improves enough to help defense
5. WVU - similar to baylor
6. ISU - bright lights too bright
7. TCU - at least better than bottom 3
8. KSU
9. TTU
10. Kansas
I think 3-6 are all going to be close.
Help me understand this?
1. OU - best
2. OSU - talent and coaching
3. UT - talent
4. Baylor - offense improves enough to help defense
5. WVU - similar to baylor
6. ISU - bright lights too bright
7. TCU - at least better than bottom 3
8. KSU
9. TTU
10. Kansas
I think 3-6 are all going to be close.
We’re starting the drinking early I see
I don't get Rambo leaving. If you are a QB or a WR I would think you would die to play for Lincoln. He is damn good, and you know you will see the ball. Who knows. Hope he find a happy place and continues to grow.
I don't get Rambo leaving. If you are a QB or a WR I would think you would die to play for Lincoln. He is damn good, and you know you will see the ball. Who knows. Hope he find a happy place and continues to grow.
This is one of the most incoherent posts I've ever tried to unsort here. Can anyone help me understand what this fellow is attempting to say?OU's bowl win was more impressive but they did not outplay Iowa State in 10 Big 12 games. It was a virtual draw. You could argue if a loss to KSU or a loss to OkSt is worse...and that actually plays in ISU's favor.
They’re saying that’s you can argue whether OU losing to KState or ISU losing to OSU was a worse loss—but OSU wound up being the higher ranked team, so ISU comes out ahead in that argument.This is one of the most incoherent posts I've ever tried to unsort here. Can anyone help me understand what this fellow is attempting to say?
Rutgers. Kansas even waxed them a few years back.
They’re saying that’s you can argue whether OU losing to KState or ISU losing to OSU was a worse loss—but OSU wound up being the higher ranked team, so ISU comes out ahead in that argument.
Basically that on the conference season, ISU and OU came out even.
(Which isn’t true, since ISU came out a game ahead)