Alert: VERY IMPORTANT: All CF users please read

Discussion in 'Site News and Announcements' started by ChrisMWilliams, Apr 8, 2013.

  1. ChrisMWilliams

    ChrisMWilliams Publisher
    Staff Member Bookie

    Apr 10, 2006
    19,971
    2,461
    113
    Male
    Hack Blogger
    Bondurant, Iowa
    Ratings:
    +3,860 / 124 / -0
    I got a scare today.

    In the mail came a note from Getty Images, basically charging CF for $1600.

    This came to us as the result of two images that were posted by a couple of our users back in 2012.

    POINT: Stealing copyrighted images off of the net and posting them on this site is not acceptable. Period. So PLEASE, I beg you, do not do it. If it ain't yours and/or you don't have permission to use it, don't post it.

    The good news is that I explained to Getty what our site was, how this happened and we removed the photos immediately. We were not required to pay the $1600 fine.

    Thanks for your time.
     
  2. Stewo

    Stewo Well-Known Member

    Oct 29, 2008
    10,206
    1,009
    113
    Male
    Commodity buyer
    Iowa
    Ratings:
    +2,981 / 175 / -0
    Lol

    Internet.
     
  3. 3TrueFans

    3TrueFans Well-Known Member

    Sep 10, 2009
    34,310
    2,660
    113
    Ames
    Ratings:
    +7,110 / 118 / -1
    How does that even work? People post pictures all the time, how is anyone supposed to know if it's a copyrighted picture that can't be used?
     
  4. theantiAIRBHG

    theantiAIRBHG Well-Known Member

    May 25, 2011
    12,018
    592
    113
    Hiawatha, IA
    Ratings:
    +1,293 / 42 / -2
    This was going to be my inquiry. I'm assuming if its from Google or Bing its fair game?
     
  5. ChrisMWilliams

    ChrisMWilliams Publisher
    Staff Member Bookie

    Apr 10, 2006
    19,971
    2,461
    113
    Male
    Hack Blogger
    Bondurant, Iowa
    Ratings:
    +3,860 / 124 / -0
    I am in the process of reaching out to some lawyers to see what is fair game, what is not.
     
  6. mtowncyclone13

    mtowncyclone13 Well-Known Member

    Oct 10, 2012
    15,815
    835
    113
    grundy center
    Ratings:
    +2,674 / 129 / -0
    all your pictures are belong to us
     
  7. carvers4math

    carvers4math Well-Known Member

    Mar 15, 2012
    12,784
    1,303
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,346 / 42 / -0
    That's fairly vigilant, albeit tardy, on their part. Glad you were able to work it out.
     
  8. cyfan964

    cyfan964 Well-Known Member

    Oct 22, 2006
    4,846
    222
    63
    4 blocks from the Jack
    Ratings:
    +277 / 1 / -0
    That's just insane. I don't see any way that that would ever hold up in court. If it was on the internet, didn't have a copyright blatantly listed on the photo itself I don't know how you could ever have to pay unless they could PROVE you were the person who posted it first. I'm curious to hear what you find out.
     
  9. 3TrueFans

    3TrueFans Well-Known Member

    Sep 10, 2009
    34,310
    2,660
    113
    Ames
    Ratings:
    +7,110 / 118 / -1
    If I can't post funny pictures anymore my posts per day is going to decrease dramatically, and that can not happen. We must assemble the finest team of internet picture lawyers the world has ever seen.
     
  10. jaretac

    jaretac Well-Known Member

    Nov 26, 2006
    7,644
    336
    83
    Frigidaire
    Ratings:
    +336 / 0 / -0
    Not trying to get off track here, but I've always wondered if you spell out the word Period and then put a period after it, is that like saying "Period period". Is the second one for extra emphases.

    Back on topic, I'm with 3TrueFans. So many images are stolen and reposted by other sites and the one you find has no resemblance of being copyrighted or stolen. You can't assume that everything is copyrighted can you?
     
  11. LutherBlue

    LutherBlue Well-Known Member

    Oct 19, 2006
    2,030
    104
    63
    Ratings:
    +294 / 31 / -0
    The person who takes the photo owns the photo. If you copy it without permission, you do so at your peril -- you'd better hope it goes unnoticed, is within the fair use exception (good luck), or the copyright holder doesn't care.
     
  12. mtowncyclone13

    mtowncyclone13 Well-Known Member

    Oct 10, 2012
    15,815
    835
    113
    grundy center
    Ratings:
    +2,674 / 129 / -0
    google went to court and successfully defended that a hosting site/message board could not be held liable for what members posted.
     
  13. Cycl1

    Cycl1 Well-Known Member

    Mar 14, 2012
    7,509
    239
    63
    M.E.
    North Liberty
    Ratings:
    +341 / 6 / -0
    So how do sites like meme generators work? Do they just get sued nonstop?
     
  14. 3TrueFans

    3TrueFans Well-Known Member

    Sep 10, 2009
    34,310
    2,660
    113
    Ames
    Ratings:
    +7,110 / 118 / -1
    Basically any internet forum that has ever existed is probably at risk of copyright claims from something at some point I'm guess.
     
  15. 3TrueFans

    3TrueFans Well-Known Member

    Sep 10, 2009
    34,310
    2,660
    113
    Ames
    Ratings:
    +7,110 / 118 / -1
    Well there we go.
     
  16. jaretac

    jaretac Well-Known Member

    Nov 26, 2006
    7,644
    336
    83
    Frigidaire
    Ratings:
    +336 / 0 / -0
    No, google and bing pop up copyrighted images. I know Wikipedia is fair game, but beyond that it is just how that site or person wants to do it. There doesn't have to be a copyright symbol, I don't think there even has to be a note saying the image is copyrighted as long as they have it in their "site legal".
     
  17. ChrisMWilliams

    ChrisMWilliams Publisher
    Staff Member Bookie

    Apr 10, 2006
    19,971
    2,461
    113
    Male
    Hack Blogger
    Bondurant, Iowa
    Ratings:
    +3,860 / 124 / -0
    Got a link to this?
     
  18. Cy$

    Cy$ Well-Known Member

    Sep 1, 2011
    18,512
    645
    113
    Being an a-hole
    Ames
    Ratings:
    +992 / 15 / -0
    this gives me an idea....






    (HN) :jimlad:
     
  19. theantiAIRBHG

    theantiAIRBHG Well-Known Member

    May 25, 2011
    12,018
    592
    113
    Hiawatha, IA
    Ratings:
    +1,293 / 42 / -2
    Talk about grey areas.
     
  20. iahawkhunter

    iahawkhunter Well-Known Member

    Apr 17, 2010
    2,926
    195
    63
    Huxley, IA
    Ratings:
    +204 / 0 / -0
    Section 230 of the DMCA (a.k.a. "Safe Harbors"): US Internet Law/Section 230 - Wikibooks, open books for an open world

    IANAL, but I thought as long as CF is responsive to takedown requests they would be protected by section 230. As posters we shouldn't try to get CF flooded with such requests, but given how many images that are posted to CF don't have easily discernable copyright information I don't know what reasonable requirements should be in place. From a practical point of view, once something is available on the public web there is no way to control its use.
     

Share This Page