***The Nard Effect, MU edition***

Discussion in 'Mens Basketball' started by andybernard, Feb 29, 2012.

  1. andybernard

    andybernard Well-Known Member

    Oct 22, 2009
    2,525
    182
    63
    Ratings:
    +524 / 15 / -0
    For those who missed the inaugural edition, this literally provides no new information. Here's the deal, I simply went through and saw who won each minute. This is not who was ahead after each minute, but who scored more points in that given minute. Here you go...
    1st Half
    20-19: miz
    19-18: miz
    18-17: miz
    17-16: ISU
    16-15: ISU
    15-14: ISU
    14-13: -----
    13-12: -----
    12-11: miz
    11-10: -----
    10-9: miz
    9-8: ISU
    8-7: ISU
    7-6: ISU
    6-5: miz
    5-4: ISU
    4-3: miz
    3-2: ISU
    2-1: miz
    1-0: -----
    2nd Half
    20-19: ISU
    19-18: miz
    18-17: miz
    17-16: ISU
    16-15: ISU
    15-14: miz
    14-13: miz
    13-12: miz
    12-11: -----
    11-10: ISU
    10-9: -----
    9-8: miz
    8-7: miz
    7-6: ISU
    6-5: -----
    5-4: -----
    4-3: -----
    3-2: miz
    2-1: miz
    1-0: ISU


    Again, NO NEW INFORMATION. Missouri won 17 minutes. We won 14. Tied in 9.
     
  2. SvrWxCy

    SvrWxCy Well-Known Member

    Aug 6, 2010
    2,851
    101
    63
    Meteorologist
    Kansas
    Ratings:
    +101 / 0 / -0
    Have you went back and done this for every game this season yet?

    Semi-:jimlad:
     
  3. andybernard

    andybernard Well-Known Member

    Oct 22, 2009
    2,525
    182
    63
    Ratings:
    +524 / 15 / -0
    No, but beings I have the whole day off tomorrow with absolutely nothing to do...
     
  4. CtownCyclone

    CtownCyclone Well-Known Member

    Jan 20, 2010
    10,878
    731
    113
    Project Engineer
    Where they love the governor
    Ratings:
    +1,733 / 23 / -0
    Seemed like there was a longer stretch there where Misery made us hurt. Although I guess they didn't really score during that time either, they just kept getting turnovers.
     
  5. Clonefan32

    Clonefan32 Well-Known Member

    Nov 19, 2008
    11,695
    1,063
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,268 / 119 / -0
    Good work Nard Dog.
     
  6. ccyclonepower25

    Jan 30, 2011
    334
    4
    18
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0
    No offense, but I don't really see how this is interesting. The winning team is always gonna win more minutes, no?
     
  7. Clonefan32

    Clonefan32 Well-Known Member

    Nov 19, 2008
    11,695
    1,063
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,268 / 119 / -0
    No.
     
  8. cysox2

    cysox2 Member

    Nov 30, 2011
    384
    13
    18
    Plumber
    Newhall
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0
    Wrong. Just think about it.
     
  9. cyfanatic13

    cyfanatic13 Well-Known Member

    Dec 19, 2008
    5,695
    231
    63
    Male
    Ratings:
    +660 / 9 / -0
    Not at all.
     
  10. Hawkeye11en1

    Hawkeye11en1 Well-Known Member

    Apr 22, 2011
    11,173
    423
    83
    Colorado
    Ratings:
    +431 / 0 / -0
    Just don't put our fist through the wall tomorrow, Nard Dog.
     
  11. cysox2

    cysox2 Member

    Nov 30, 2011
    384
    13
    18
    Plumber
    Newhall
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0
    While it is highly unlikely, it would be possible that they only win 1 minute
     
  12. CycloneGB

    CycloneGB Well-Known Member

    Jul 20, 2010
    2,102
    131
    63
    Ratings:
    +174 / 3 / -0
    Exactly!!





    :jimlad:
     
  13. ccyclonepower25

    Jan 30, 2011
    334
    4
    18
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0
    Yeah, I guess if you build a huge lead and lose it quick.

    Still not sure how this stat is really that useful.

    I love the Nard-Dog though:smile:
     
  14. Ciclone

    Ciclone Well-Known Member

    May 5, 2008
    3,320
    200
    63
    Clive
    Ratings:
    +200 / 0 / -0
    I bet if Nard Man went back and did the @KU game, we may have won more minutes.
     
  15. CYlent Bob

    CYlent Bob Well-Known Member

    Aug 7, 2006
    3,250
    181
    63
    engineer/surveyor/rancher
    The Winterset Metroplex
    Ratings:
    +181 / 0 / -0
    Once you go back & do the whole season (hint, hint, hint), it's going to be interesting to see if our "peaks & valleys" occur in the same parts of each game. Or if it's totally dependent on the opposing coach's abilities (ie: the first few minutes of the second half at KSU looked different than the first few minutes of the Iowa game's second half. Mainly because Frank Martin is a better coach than Mad Fran.......and Frank strangled two cheerleaders & a mascot at the beginning of halftime to "get his team's attention").
     
  16. CYlent Bob

    CYlent Bob Well-Known Member

    Aug 7, 2006
    3,250
    181
    63
    engineer/surveyor/rancher
    The Winterset Metroplex
    Ratings:
    +181 / 0 / -0
    ...but that won't tell us what we need to hear, so you'll have to run the Nard Effect on all our opponents' schedules to see if ISU knocked them out of their comfort zone. And then you'll have to run the NardEff on THEIR opponents' schedules to see if our opponents took their opponents out of their game plan, and then you can do a full statistical analysis of whether or not our responses to opponents is acceptable or substandard.

    Now that I read all that back, I think you're going to need at least 3 grad students and a grant. Can you buy computers and office furniture with CF coupons & credits?
     
  17. Hawkeye11en1

    Hawkeye11en1 Well-Known Member

    Apr 22, 2011
    11,173
    423
    83
    Colorado
    Ratings:
    +431 / 0 / -0
    Totally different scenarios and the game was out of hand already - but you do realize the start of the 2nd half against Iowa was the time that Iowa actually made a decent run? So your point about coaches kind of backfires there...
     
  18. CtownCyclone

    CtownCyclone Well-Known Member

    Jan 20, 2010
    10,878
    731
    113
    Project Engineer
    Where they love the governor
    Ratings:
    +1,733 / 23 / -0
    This question can only be answered by NardAnalysis! Make it so!
     

Share This Page