SMILEY FACE KILLERS

[JY07]

No offense, but it's obvious you know nothing about proofs. If you actually prove something without a doubt, there's no reason for a counter proof. Counter proofs are meant to disprove something, get it? If you prove something, why the **** would you need a counter proof?

If you have something, such as photographic evidence, it's part of the proof. You wouldn't need any other work on the proof...counter example or not.

I can't believe I just read that.

QED

sounds like instead of dealing with these amateurs, you might want to get with your old comp sci logic course professor and get hammering at the counter-proof proof counter to show once and for all this theory is viable.

if you think about it, you're almost there (from your previous posts):

-Serial killers kill people dead
-People are dead when they drown

THUS

serial killers killed people dead in the midwest over the past 10 years

there's no way we can refute that

 

[marothisu]

sounds like instead of dealing with these amateurs, you might want to get with your old comp sci logic course professor and get hammering at the counter-proof proof counter to show once and for all this theory is viable.

if you think about it, you're almost there (from your previous posts):

-Serial killers kill people dead
-People are dead when they drown

THUS

serial killers killed people dead in the midwest over the past 10 years

there's no way we can refute that

Wow, what a great comeback


Maybe you should read the first few pages when I posted. I'm not trying to PROVE the SFK. I'm showing how it's logically VIABLE. There's a big ******* difference in these two types of proof and if you can't see it, you have no business even trying to talk about it.

I have no idea if the SFK exist or not, I'm saying it's POSSIBLE for that to happen and the chances of it are not THAT small. Do you see the difference or do I have to explain it some more?

 

[LonoClone]

No offense, but it's obvious you know nothing about proofs. If you actually prove something without a doubt, there's no reason for a counter proof. Counter proofs are meant to disprove something, get it? If you prove something, why the **** would you need a counter proof?

If you have something, such as photographic evidence, it's part of the proof. You wouldn't need any other work on the proof...counter example or not.

I can't believe I just read that.

QED

No offense, but it's obvious that you know nothing about sarcasm.

 

[marothisu]

Nobody has yet to show me why, viably, a serial killer who does this cannot possibly exist. I'm not asking you for proof in ANY of these cases. I'm asking for why it's not "very possible" this could happen. That's what I've been asking for since yesterday, and nobody has done it yet and nobody has even comprehended it either, which is ******* sad.


Listen, I can state any ******* opinion I want to. Are you ready?
1) I don't think the transportation in the city of Chicago has ANY affect on the crime rate. How stupid is that to believe it does?

2) I don't think it's possible for anything to go faster than the speed of light. The speed of light is the fastest thing in the universe.


I guess because I said it, my two statements above are true. Who needs proof when you can just talk about anything?



All I've heard is this: NOISE. Give me some ******* substance. You are like anybody else, stating your opinion. if you actually want to be persuasive, you prove your opinions. Or did you miss that somewhere along the way in life?

 

[marothisu]

No offense, but it's obvious that you know nothing about sarcasm.

It's obvious you can't tell the difference between a serious conversation and a sarcastic one.

 

[JY07]

It's obvious you can't tell the difference between a serious conversation and a sarcastic one.

 

[RustShack]

Its pretty funny that people thing all of them have to be connected or none can be connected. You act like only one person or people who know that person can kill someone. Heaven forbid theres multiple killers that are in no way connected. Heaven forbid one person drown on their own and another one be killed. Jesus not all of them are connected, that doesn't mean a smiley face killer can't exist.

 

[delt4cy]

Another La Crosse drowning.

Student who drowned in La Crosse was intoxicated - JSOnline

 

[jtdoyle1]

for your consideration...

Chris Hardie: Is photographic evidence enough to silence the fearmongers?

I hate to state this because I don't believe that all these drownings are caused by a group of serial killers but one set of foot prints doesn't prove or disprove anything for the simple fact that the victim could have been carried. Although 1 person carrying a male college student by themself for that distance is a little hard to believe as well.

 

[CyPhy]

Another La Crosse drowning.

Student who drowned in La Crosse was intoxicated - JSOnline

...and women who are raped when they are drunk "deserved it."

 

[Mr Janny]

I hate to state this because I don't believe that all these drownings are caused by a group of serial killers but one set of foot prints doesn't prove or disprove anything for the simple fact that the victim could have been carried. Although 1 person carrying a male college student by themself for that distance is a little hard to believe as well.

I think the point of the article is that there is one set of footprints that go to the water's edge, and then no footprints coming back, indicating that a single person walked to the edge and fell in. I suppose it could have been a person carrying another person, but in order for the tracks to make sense, they both would have had to jump in.

 

[Mr Janny]

...and women who are raped when they are drunk "deserved it."

completely faulty argument. The article doesn't say that the student deserved it, or even hinted at it. It only says that he more than three times the legal limit of alcohol in his bloodstream at the time of death, and that his BAC level, along with hypothermia contributed to his death.

 

[isucyfan]

I hate to state this because I don't believe that all these drownings are caused by a group of serial killers but one set of foot prints doesn't prove or disprove anything for the simple fact that the victim could have been carried. Although 1 person carrying a male college student by themself for that distance is a little hard to believe as well.

The footprints would also be at a much different depth if an adult were carrying another adult. That would leave a much deeper impression.

 

[06_CY]

I think the point of the article is that there is one set of footprints that go to the water's edge, and then no footprints coming back, indicating that a single person walked to the edge and fell in. I suppose it could have been a person carrying another person, but in order for the tracks to make sense, they both would have had to jump in.

Hoverboard I tell you.

 

[AlleyAddict]

Hoverboard I tell you.

they had dogs try to get the scent of those footsteps and they didnt match the kid the scent of the kid that drown

 

[Mr Janny]

they had dogs try to get the scent of those footsteps and they didnt match the kid the scent of the kid that drown

article?


Here's one that reports that they used dogs to track him down to the river where they found footprints.
Missing student's body found in river

Here's another one

Craig Meyers alcohol content was 0.28 percent

 

[cyfan013]

groups of people cant kill other people? really? i guess the holocaust didnt happen, or any other genocide. im not saying i believe in the SFK and im definitely dont think its a start of a genocide at all but saying that it couldn't possibly be a group of killers is unlikely to me doesnt seem realistic since people kill other people.

 

[marothisu]

groups of people cant kill other people? really? i guess the holocaust didnt happen, or any other genocide. im not saying i believe in the SFK and im definitely dont think its a start of a genocide at all but saying that it couldn't possibly be a group of killers is unlikely to me doesnt seem realistic since people kill other people.

That's what I've been trying to say, although only a few people have been smart enough to actually understand. Hey, it's totally possible it's all not true, but logically thinking...groups of people killing other people exists. It's not that far fetched.

 

[cyfan013]

That's what I've been trying to say, although only a few people have been smart enough to actually understand. Hey, it's totally possible it's all not true, but logically thinking...groups of people killing other people exists. It's not that far fetched.

exactly and saying that it is unlikely when its happened in the past and is in our history books and ive watched personal interviews from people in the holocaust, is crap. there are crazy people out there and everyone should realize that instead of thinking that they live in a perfect world.

 

[marothisu]

exactly and saying that it is unlikely when its happened in the past and is in our history books and ive watched personal interviews from people in the holocaust, is crap. there are crazy people out there and everyone should realize that instead of thinking that they live in a perfect world.

Well, I think the main point is not to do with "it happened in the holocaust." People targeting other people and killing them happens all the time, is the point. That's what serial killers do. Jeffrey Dahmer didn't target just anyone, for example. He targeted gay men from a certain race (well, I think it was a few races) only.

Murders happen SOMEWHERE everyday.