Size Comparison of Sci-Fi Spaceships

Daserop

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2011
5,876
2,211
113
The Bebop
Even though the chart is for spaceships, it would have been cool to get Unicron (the transformer that eats planets) on the chart.
 

RubyClone

Active Member
Mar 21, 2014
3,110
17
38
A guide to what it will take to build one if you are looking for a weekend project:

http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/178...er-800000-years-and-852-quadrillion-to-build/

So the cost is 13000 x the GDP of the entire world? But it'll take 833,000 years to build it. So if you got a simple 30 yr loan (and we're still at comparatively low rates) per year of GDP cost, that's still only 390,000 years to pay the thing off - nearly half the production time.

I say we go for it. Damn ISIS is out of control as it is.
 

PabloDiablo

Well-Known Member
Feb 10, 2011
2,862
182
63
42
Omaha, NE
So which is bigger, death star or the mothership from Independence Day?

Nerd pic of the week:
E6D_IA_145.jpg
That is a pic of the Executor class Super Star Destroyer (listed at 19000 meters) crashing into the surface of the Death Star. Gives a little perspective of how big the Death Star was.
 

RubyClone

Active Member
Mar 21, 2014
3,110
17
38
Nerd pic of the week:
View attachment 28655
That is a pic of the Executor class Super Star Destroyer (listed at 19000 meters) crashing into the surface of the Death Star. Gives a little perspective of how big the Death Star was.

Actually - this site suggests the ID4 ship was considerably larger than either death star. Have no idea the basis. Wiki suggests that the ID4 mother ship is 500 km in diameter, whereas the death stars are both under 200...

I'm going to go reflect on my life now....
 

Jordanj6502

Well-Known Member
Jan 9, 2010
4,096
81
48
Ames
Actually - this site suggests the ID4 ship was considerably larger than either death star. Have no idea the basis. Wiki suggests that the ID4 mother ship is 500 km in diameter, whereas the death stars are both under 200...

I'm going to go reflect on my life now....

I thought the first death star was ~200km but the second was ~900km.
 

RubyClone

Active Member
Mar 21, 2014
3,110
17
38
Yeah the second was going to be way bigger before THOSE DAMN REBELS blew it up again

Must have had one hell of a contractor to get ahead of the 800,000+ yr timeline.

Tom_Silva.jpg
 

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
48,460
39,261
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
They use world production of steel as their limiting factor in the 800,000 year timeline. I’m pretty sure that the Empire would have more than one measly planet as sources of iron and other metals. Even asteroids are iron heavy. More likely the actual construction schedule would be the limiting factor. We are probably down to 400,000 years. We can do this!
 

aeroclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2006
10,365
7,183
113
Must have had one hell of a contractor to get ahead of the 800,000+ yr timeline.

Tom_Silva.jpg

Most contractors would stay away from the Death Star construction job due to their personal politics.

[video=youtube;C4MVQby0InQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4MVQby0InQ[/video]