Idea: separate recruiting threads with actual news only

Trice

Well-Known Member
Apr 1, 2010
7,315
12,173
113
Every few days I check in on the MBB board for recruiting news/updates and have to wade through dozens of people speculating, and arguing about each other's speculation, to find any real, actual news or updates on a given recruit. Often I find it impossible to find any substantive updates because I have hundreds of useless posts to get through.

Maybe for major recruits that generate a significant amount of discussion, we could split this into two threads. One thread would be for news only - articles, tweets, recruiting page status updates, etc. I don't know how you define this, maybe anything from a third-party source or CF writers that can be linked to, but no comments or speculation from CF users.

Then the second thread could be the traditional message board recruiting chatter. That way those of us who only check in occasionally could get an update easily and ignore the chatter if we want.

I would be open to other suggestions, but the bottom line is that an overwhelming percentage of posts in recruiting threads are totally useless and anything to improve the signal/noise ratio would be great.
 

RoseClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
2,828
2,464
113
Every few days I check in on the MBB board for recruiting news/updates and have to wade through dozens of people speculating, and arguing about each other's speculation, to find any real, actual news or updates on a given recruit. Often I find it impossible to find any substantive updates because I have hundreds of useless posts to get through.

Maybe for major recruits that generate a significant amount of discussion, we could split this into two threads. One thread would be for news only - articles, tweets, recruiting page status updates, etc. I don't know how you define this, maybe anything from a third-party source or CF writers that can be linked to, but no comments or speculation from CF users.

Then the second thread could be the traditional message board recruiting chatter. That way those of us who only check in occasionally could get an update easily and ignore the chatter if we want.

I would be open to other suggestions, but the bottom line is that an overwhelming percentage of posts in recruiting threads are totally useless and anything to improve the signal/noise ratio would be great.

I like the idea but many here love long threads regardless of their worthlessness. I tend to avoid them because they deviate from the topic way too often.
 

Trice

Well-Known Member
Apr 1, 2010
7,315
12,173
113
I like the idea but many here love long threads regardless of their worthlessness. I tend to avoid them because they deviate from the topic way too often.

I'm not arguing those should go away. The long threads could still post news too. I'd just like a news-only thread (or some other solution) for when I don't have 20 minutes to go through days' worth of nothingness.
 

coolerifyoudid

Well-Known Member
Feb 8, 2013
17,317
27,032
113
KC
Those threads would get buried so quickly due to lack of posts because actual news regarding recruits is few and far between. I'd just assume that until you see something started by Chris, Rob or Brent that most of the stuff is speculation or some random tweet.

The Diallo thread would have one post. We're interested in him.
 

pulse

Well-Known Member
Mar 24, 2006
9,420
2,650
113
Those threads would get buried so quickly due to lack of posts because actual news regarding recruits is few and far between. I'd just assume that until you see something started by Chris, Rob or Brent that most of the stuff is speculation or some random tweet.

The Diallo thread would have one post. We're interested in him.

Exactly. Everyone's desire for new and exciting news is completely contradictory the fact that there very rarely is.
 

Trice

Well-Known Member
Apr 1, 2010
7,315
12,173
113
Exactly. Everyone's desire for new and exciting news is completely contradictory the fact that there very rarely is.

I'm not talking hard news like a guy has narrowed down his top 5 or made a decision or whatever. Even new stories posted about a recruit, even if they don't offer anything new, is fine. Updates from those web sites that give % guesses on what school he's going to pick is fine. Like I said in my original post, anything from a third party or informed speculation from CF writers is fine. I just want a way to get that kind of information without all the crosstalk that adds zero value. (There's a place for that, I - and I suspect many others - just don't always have time to wade through it all.)
 

klamath632

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2011
12,430
323
83
Every few days I check in on the MBB board for recruiting news/updates and have to wade through dozens of people speculating, and arguing about each other's speculation, to find any real, actual news or updates on a given recruit. Often I find it impossible to find any substantive updates because I have hundreds of useless posts to get through.

Maybe for major recruits that generate a significant amount of discussion, we could split this into two threads. One thread would be for news only - articles, tweets, recruiting page status updates, etc. I don't know how you define this, maybe anything from a third-party source or CF writers that can be linked to, but no comments or speculation from CF users.

Then the second thread could be the traditional message board recruiting chatter. That way those of us who only check in occasionally could get an update easily and ignore the chatter if we want.

I would be open to other suggestions, but the bottom line is that an overwhelming percentage of posts in recruiting threads are totally useless and anything to improve the signal/noise ratio would be great.

Five-Ways-that-Copywriting-Can-Help-a-Complete-Sissy-Survive-in-Prison.jpg
 

ForbinsAscynt

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2014
5,050
6,302
113
This is how message boards work. Some news drops, people discuss. Yes there is a ton of BS but your news only thread would turn into the same quickly. and there would be a "this is a news only thread" every other post. Bad idea
 

Trice

Well-Known Member
Apr 1, 2010
7,315
12,173
113
This is how message boards work. Some news drops, people discuss. Yes there is a ton of BS but your news only thread would turn into the same quickly. and there would be a "this is a news only thread" every other post. Bad idea

It won't turn into that if it's curated. They curate threads already. This is just one step further. I'd like to at least have the option not to read 99 posts of nothing to find 1 post of actual value when it comes to recruiting.
 

benjay

Well-Known Member
Mar 23, 2006
5,141
372
83
I share your disdain for incessant thread pollution (usually about the same 20 posters in a circle-jerk). But it's a forum with news on the side - not vice versa.
 

klamath632

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2011
12,430
323
83
Count me in. Too much drama often times.

It won't turn into that if it's curated. They curate threads already. This is just one step further. I'd like to at least have the option not to read 99 posts of nothing to find 1 post of actual value when it comes to recruiting.

1. Mods have enough to do.
2. This is a free site.
3. Stop crying.
 

ForbinsAscynt

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2014
5,050
6,302
113
Yes yes and yes. This would take up 90% of mods time and yes I just pulled that% out of my ***
 

ChrisMWilliams

Publisher
Staff member
Bookie
Apr 10, 2006
25,232
50,292
113
41
Bondurant, Iowa
www.CycloneFanatic.com
Thanks guys.

Honestly, every time that any news "breaks," I try to create a separate thread that isn't part of a "mega thread." For instance, I did this today with the Clayton Custer news. I'll try to keep doing it more and more going forward. I understand your distaste for the long threads. They aren't for everybody. We try to keep this place as organized as humanly possible.