MLB: Selig NOT going to overturn missed call...should he have?

Discussion in 'Pro Sports' started by clonehenge, Jun 3, 2010.

  1. clonehenge

    clonehenge Active Member

    Apr 14, 2006
    976
    181
    43
    Male
    Ratings:
    +436 / 9 / -0
    I think he should have...if nothing else to relieve the stress on Jim Joyce...I feel for that guy...

    The outcome of the game would not have been affected and it's a yes/no call...not an intepretive call.

    I realize it may open a whole can of worms but it just seems like it would really have no negative effect and it would only be positive for Jim Joyce...you can tell that guy is heartbroken about it.
     
  2. Bobber

    Bobber Well-Known Member

    Apr 12, 2006
    8,567
    188
    63
    Management/Sales
    Hudson, Iowa
    Ratings:
    +297 / 11 / -0
    It is a can of worms...

    What I'm wondering about is how can 2 perfect games be thrown within a week of each other? Has the the strike zone been changed that much in the last 30 years?
     
  3. DaddyMac

    DaddyMac Well-Known Member

    Oct 18, 2006
    14,352
    457
    83
    Ratings:
    +457 / 0 / -0
    I read on MSNBC this morning that MLB threw out nearly 50 perfect games for a variety of reason (which they didn't delve into) back around 1990.

    Not sure why you couldn't put one in that was rightfully earned.

    In my mind, if you have the ability to correct the mistake - you should. This is a historical moment that is easily correctable.
     
  4. CycloneErik

    CycloneErik Well-Known Member

    Jan 31, 2008
    77,333
    4,930
    113
    Grad Student
    Jamerica
    Ratings:
    +12,151 / 330 / -0
    Mine, too. It's pretty simple.
     
  5. 3TrueFans

    3TrueFans Well-Known Member

    Sep 10, 2009
    35,363
    3,035
    113
    Ames
    Ratings:
    +9,084 / 190 / -1
    Definitely not. What they should do is admit that their rules, namely lack of replay, is terrible and will cost this kid a perfect game. If they want to correct things like this they need to make it so it can be corrected during the game, not after.
     
  6. CycloneWanderer

    CycloneWanderer Well-Known Member

    Nov 4, 2007
    5,196
    325
    83
    Male
    Leadership Development
    Wandering
    Ratings:
    +609 / 8 / -0
    I agree, give him the perfect game - he did actually pitch it and the only thing which prevented it was a terrible terrible terrible call. If they can throw out perfect games, they should be able to give them out.
     
  7. pyrocyz

    pyrocyz Well-Known Member

    Jun 2, 2006
    2,841
    124
    63
    Ames
    Ratings:
    +124 / 0 / -0
    Simple answer is no...In my mind, the league cannot undermine the umps on this.

    The NBA does with their technical fouls but that is already a league where people believe that everything is rigged. Would the Celtics have won the Eastern conference finals if the league hadn't overturned Perkins technical? Not in game 6.
     
  8. jdoggivjc

    jdoggivjc Well-Known Member

    Sep 27, 2006
    45,181
    2,218
    113
    Publications Manager
    Macomb, MI
    Ratings:
    +4,955 / 104 / -1
    Selig is in denial. If he overturns it, then he has no argument that instant replay should be instituted, which he is vehemently opposed to. Basically he's refusing to admit that baseball has a problem, avenues are already in place to fix the problem, but his pride is getting in the way of doing the right thing. Because Selig is vehemently opposed to it, he is too prideful to admit that he is wrong.
     
  9. isucy1234

    isucy1234 Active Member

    Apr 2, 2009
    715
    36
    28
    Ratings:
    +36 / 0 / -0
    Simply, yes. He should have.

    Eventually, it's inevitable that instant replays will be present in the MLB. There isn't/won't ever be a better situation to use one in than this one. Period.
     
  10. DaddyMac

    DaddyMac Well-Known Member

    Oct 18, 2006
    14,352
    457
    83
    Ratings:
    +457 / 0 / -0
    I think it's two separate issues, but you're right.

    I suppose I don't understand why they have replay for foul/fair. But not for something seemingly more important like out/safe.
     
  11. BCoffClone125

    BCoffClone125 Active Member

    May 19, 2010
    792
    80
    28
    Male
    Ratings:
    +278 / 10 / -0
    I think he should have, that guy deserved his name in the history books, but at the same time it makes plenty of sense why he wouldn't. There are many of examples of games where one missed call has affected the outcome. If Selig overturns this call, I guarantee he will have plenty of other people angry at him for not reversing other missed calls that have affected games. He can't give this call special treatment, it wouldn't be fair to everyone else. It sucks for baseball...but until they change something about instant replay this is how it's gonna be.
     
  12. wonkadog

    wonkadog Well-Known Member

    Apr 17, 2006
    4,433
    70
    48
    Ames, IA
    Ratings:
    +102 / 1 / -0
    And to think I almost thought the NBA was getting better/watchable in terms of officiating. Like the league execs weren't drooling over all the bandwagoning Lakers/Celtics fans from back in the 80's....
     
  13. clonehenge

    clonehenge Active Member

    Apr 14, 2006
    976
    181
    43
    Male
    Ratings:
    +436 / 9 / -0
    They talked about that on ESPN...they said those were mostly no hitters and they were thrown out because they were shortened games...not a full 9 innings.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. wxman1

    wxman1 Well-Known Member

    Jul 2, 2008
    9,868
    1,054
    113
    Cedar Rapids
    Ratings:
    +2,467 / 92 / -0
    I don't think so and I don't think baseball should have replay either...it's already a slow game don't make it slower.
     
  15. fsanford

    fsanford Well-Known Member

    Dec 22, 2007
    3,272
    205
    63
    Los Angeles
    Ratings:
    +760 / 36 / -0
    So lets say guy has a 3-2 count on a guy 2 outs in the 9th, pitching a perfect game. Ump calls ball 4 on a borderline pitch, is that reviewable?

    Same principle as the out and safe call because there is the technology to determine if it was a strike or not..

    Tough luck, but you cannot overturn the call.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. DRCHIRO

    DRCHIRO Well-Known Member

    Jun 13, 2008
    2,444
    144
    63
    Ratings:
    +210 / 3 / -0
    It's a tough decision.

    If you would overturn this then what becomes fair game to also overturn???

    It's a crappy situation. In this case, what makes babseball great, the human element, has put a black eye on the game. (For the moment)
     
  17. jdoggivjc

    jdoggivjc Well-Known Member

    Sep 27, 2006
    45,181
    2,218
    113
    Publications Manager
    Macomb, MI
    Ratings:
    +4,955 / 104 / -1
    So you don't think the umps should spend the additional 2 minutes it would take to get the call right? :confused:
     
  18. CycloneRulzzz

    CycloneRulzzz Well-Known Member

    Jul 13, 2008
    31,347
    3,310
    113
    Male
    Nevada, IA
    Ratings:
    +5,202 / 62 / -0
    Yes he should have but not surprised he didn't. The guy is a terrible commissioner. This is just another terrible decision like the tie all star game and putting home field advantage on the line. I wish baseball could remove Selig from his position. He is a disgrace to the game of baseball.
     
  19. clonehenge

    clonehenge Active Member

    Apr 14, 2006
    976
    181
    43
    Male
    Ratings:
    +436 / 9 / -0
    They also mentioned on ESPN that they (I think it was Selig) went back and took away Pedro Martinez's perfect game that he had through 9 innings because he lost it in the 10th inning.

    So there is some sort of precedent.

    It is a slippery slope...it's just too bad. Galarraga turned in the Tigers line up card to Joyce today (who's umping behind the plate) and Joyce was in tears.
     
  20. DaddyMac

    DaddyMac Well-Known Member

    Oct 18, 2006
    14,352
    457
    83
    Ratings:
    +457 / 0 / -0
    #20 DaddyMac, Jun 3, 2010
    Last edited: Jun 3, 2010
    There is the can of worms. How far do you take it?

    I can completely see where you never allow replay for ball/strikes. Not much different to me than penalties being non-reviewable in football.

    But it would seem to me the rest of the game should be open to review. Outs, fair/foul.

    Fair and foul is the only thing reviewable currently right? Can't review catches or things like last night (obviously).

    Take your example another direction.... 3-2, batter jacks one over the left field pole. Perfect game goes bye-bye.... but wait! Under further review it was deemed foul and he swings and misses on the next pitch to preserve the perfect game. So in some ways, they are already overturning the calls.

    Someone said it earlier - need to make it so it can be corrected during the game.

    For me, it's not an issue of changing the outcome of the game but rather giving the due to the historical significance of the game.
     

Share This Page