Found this to kind of bring home the point on there being no teacher shortage:
Give the politicians, lobbyists, and policy wonks that shill for the education establishment extra credit for their success in spreading and milking the myth that we have a teacher shortage in Oklahoma. They could teach a master class on how to deceive with numbers. We shouldn’t be too hard on ourselves, however, they are pulling off this con all over the country.
Here’s how it works. Remember that every year, the education establishment’s first priority is winning across-the-board salary increases. How can you convince people we don’t pay all teachers enough? You argue that salaries are too low to attract people into the profession.
http://journalrecord.com/2015/04/29/right-thinking-there-is-no-teacher-shortage-opinion/
Sorry dude, but that is just nice political garbage from someone who ok with making arguments about something he has no background in. Believe it if you want to, it is a free country. However, if you want the real story, don't read propaganda
on either side, go talk to the Iowa Principals who are trying to find people even somewhat able to do the job. Positions that used to have 50 candidates twenty years ago, became 20 candidates ten years ago, and now VERY routinely have 0-3 candidates, and the 3 are folks who were fired somewhere else, or not certified. I have heard that it is very common in urban cities (Phoenix, LA, LV ) to now recruit teachers from the Philippines, because they will otherwise have no teachers in front of kids in dozens and dozens of classrooms. So it is definitely a problem in Iowa, but not just in Iowa. The political right sees things skewed one way, the left another, but how about if we ignore the politicians and just stick to reality? Actual people in your community. If you live in one of Iowa's urban areas, you may hear that I am off base and hiring teachers is ok, because, as noted by many, they just recruit from smaller districts (the farm team, literally). But talk to anyone from the smallest 300 districts in the state, and you will find a different story. You want a job, or want your kids to get one? Major yourself, or have your kids major in Ag. Ed., Science or Math Ed., Spec. Ed. or actually nearly any secondary education major except Social Studies or PE. They will have districts recruiting them and have their choice of many many jobs. Why?? Because there is a shortage, regardless of the BS political rhetoric. Any principal or superintendent in the state of Iowa can tear Andrew C. Spiropoulos' arguments to shreds, not based on philosophy or his ruminations while sitting in a posh law office, but on practical day to day experiences. Iowa educators from many of your home towns are advertising and recruiting until the cows come home, and still coming up short. As an example of what I am talking about, in the Andrew C. Spiropoulos' business world, having 800 openings with 40000 people employed is just fine and dandy. In Tulsa, OK, 100 openings means that at any one time, there are 2000-3000 students (At least!!) not learning nearly as much as they should be learning. If the 100 opening are secondary teachers, the impact could be somewhere 10,000 and 15,000 students!!! No exaggeration!! I fully expect Andrew C. Spiropoulos' next guest editorial will be to criticize the Tulsa district for student test scores failing to live up to his expectations. I wonder why that would happen????? Useless politicians and PAC organizations anyway.