Just a reminder that PAC12 won't take religious institutions so BU and TCU would be outta luck. Also, they care about academics as well so TTU, OSU and K-State could have issues as well. ISU and KU may be only ones going but it's not happening.
There are idiots in twitter claiming OU and Texas to the Big 10..lol
The whole thing is ludicrousNot just Twitter - Detroit sports talk radio. Mike Valenti is still convinced it's just a matter of time before Texas is in the Big 10 - never mind the fact they'd have to forego the guaranteed payout of LHN, sacrifice whatever TV revenue they earn in the Big 10 for the reaminder of the GOR, and be required to play games - sometimes night games - in northern latitudes in November. Something they have always refused to do.
No way Texas gives up the LHN to join the ACC. Texas is just starting to see its escalated payouts kick in. They are guaranteed around $20m by 2032 and will be making around $15M in the near term, which is nearly double the $8M revenue the ACC Network will pay.
The only way Texas jumps when the Big12 contract is up in 2025 is if ESPN agrees to a significant lump sum buyout e.g. $100M
IMO all his talk is the annual talk to drive ratings and clicks.
Wouldn't Norte Dame be giving up a lot with NBC by joining full time as well? I can see Texas joining as an affiliate just like the Irish. Does Notre Dame currently take a smaller cut because of their quasi independence?
Wouldn't Norte Dame be giving up a lot with NBC by joining full time as well? I can see Texas joining as an affiliate just like the Irish. Does Notre Dame currently take a smaller cut because of their quasi independence?
I always just SMH when I think of Texas in the Big 10. It's even more insane than Mizzou in the SEC. (Mizzou only has 1 game farther than 1000 miles. Florida).Not just Twitter - Detroit sports talk radio. Mike Valenti is still convinced it's just a matter of time before Texas is in the Big 10 - never mind the fact they'd have to forego the guaranteed payout of LHN, sacrifice whatever TV revenue they earn in the Big 10 for the reaminder of the GOR, and be required to play games - sometimes night games - in northern latitudes in November. Something they have always refused to do.
Just a reminder that PAC12 won't take religious institutions so BU and TCU would be outta luck. Also, they care about academics as well so TTU, OSU and K-State could have issues as well. ISU and KU may be only ones going but it's not happening.
Many things to agree with in this post...but until the money stops the travel (and sprawling conferences) will continue. 2024/2025 are really a potential break points with football and TV contracts...I always just SMH when I think of Texas in the Big 10. It's even more insane than Mizzou in the SEC. (Mizzou only has 1 game farther than 1000 miles. Florida).
Meanwhile, Texas' closest Big 10 opponent (not counting OU if they tagged along. BTW, OU is not a member of the AAU so I could see some Presidents not liking the idea of adding another non-AAU University to the conference. It sounds like if Nebraska was kicked out of the AAU before joining, they never would have gotten the invite) would be Nebraska at 800 miles. The next closest is Illinois at 1,027 and Iowa at 1,043. Ames is 965 miles to Austin.
Look at it this way, if Texas were to join the Big 10, their closest conference opponent would nearly be the same distance as their current farthest opponent in the Big 12.
Geographically speaking, Iowa St in the SEC makes more sense than Texas in the Big 10.
I wonder how excited their players and recruits are going to be when they hear they no longer will be playing 8-9 of their games in the warm, sunny states of Texas and Oklahoma. Now, they get to travel to New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin, etc in the late Fall.
Sooner or later the AD's and Presidents are going to look at each other and think WTF is happening? Our Volleyball team is flying 1300 miles on Tuesday to play a 1 hour volleyball match and then this weekend they have to fly 1100 miles for another 1 hour volleyball match.
The bubble is going to burst and I think it's going to happen sooner than some realize.
It won't happen but they just need to start over from scratch and make 7-8, 10 team conferences based purely on geography and history. The stadiums will fill back up and a lot of great rivalries will ignite/rebirth.
Yep, which is why I think the TV $ bubble bursts around that time frame. If the current cord cutting trend keeps up, ESPN won't be able to afford to pay out their tv contracts.Many things to agree with in this post...but until the money stops the travel (and sprawling conferences) will continue. 2024/2025 are really a potential break points with football and TV contracts...
Homer conference for ISU...
Illinois
Iowa
Iowa State
Kansas
Kansas State
Minnesota
Missouri
Northwestern
Nebraska
Wisconsin
= road trips every other weekend.
Sooner or later the AD's and Presidents are going to look at each other and think WTF is happening?
Your opinion is worth at least a dime cause it's right on. Then a massive 'marketing' campaign will emerge trying to get the non-collegiates all across the globe to embrace our Cyclones.Regardless of what happens with the ACC, I still think the entire landscape of college athletics will be very different 8-10 years from now. With all the cord cutting going on, ESPN declining at a rapid pace, and the increase of Netflix/Hulu/Amazon/Sling etc I think the whole what "TV Market" do you bring will be nearly obsolete. I see it transitioning from TV market size to actual fan base size.
Just my 2 cents.
I disagree .... kind of. I think the networks will 'build' rivalries to create a broader coverage.Academics won't matter in the next round of realignment. TV will demand big name football match ups.
Your opinion is worth at least a dime cause it's right on. Then a massive 'marketing' campaign will emerge trying to get the non-collegiates all across the globe to embrace our Cyclones.
It, certainly, is going to tax the 'rural' schools. We will see.
The other schools in UCONNs region want nothing to do with them.
I disagree .... kind of. I think the networks will 'build' rivalries to create a broader coverage.