Rules>Common Sense/Doing The Right Thing

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by Cyclone711, Mar 29, 2008.

  1. Cyclone711

    Cyclone711 Active Member

    Oct 27, 2007
    947
    30
    28
    Student
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +30 / 0 / -0
  2. ISUKyro

    ISUKyro Well-Known Member

    Oct 28, 2006
    10,911
    299
    83
    Houston, TX
    Ratings:
    +339 / 3 / -0
    Not to be a bleep bleep. But it's right there in the heath care plan. If you sue and get extra money, but big fish wants it back. Just because we love to hate on walmart doesn't mean they shouldn't get the money back.
    Sad to say it but I'm with Wal-Mart on this one.
     
  3. TykeClone

    TykeClone Burgermeister!

    Oct 18, 2006
    24,977
    579
    113
    Ratings:
    +752 / 7 / -0
    They're in the "right"

    But it's neither kind nor honorable.
     
  4. Cyclone711

    Cyclone711 Active Member

    Oct 27, 2007
    947
    30
    28
    Student
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +30 / 0 / -0
    Doubt you would be if you were in their shoes. (Don't go for the obvious response of you would have read the fine print).
     
  5. ISUAlum2002

    ISUAlum2002 Well-Known Member

    Apr 11, 2006
    18,239
    388
    83
    Urbandale
    Ratings:
    +767 / 38 / -0
    Previously posted, but the reasoning is that its right there in the contract, and if you make an exception here, why not make more exceptions for everyone else that doesn't want to obey contracts?
     
  6. ISUKyro

    ISUKyro Well-Known Member

    Oct 28, 2006
    10,911
    299
    83
    Houston, TX
    Ratings:
    +339 / 3 / -0

    Oh I agree, if I was in that situation or a friend or family member was I know I would want to keep it. Not saying the situation isn't a real stinker. But Wal-Mart didn't get to be the size it did by letting too much money slip away.
     
  7. tube1

    tube1 Well-Known Member

    Oct 19, 2006
    2,096
    84
    48
    Ratings:
    +92 / 0 / -0
    They say ignorance of the law is not excuse. Therefore, not understanding the fine print is not an excuse either. If the language is there, you must abide.
     
  8. CloneFan65

    CloneFan65 Well-Known Member

    Apr 11, 2006
    2,318
    129
    63
    Math Professor
    Phoenix, AZ
    Ratings:
    +180 / 1 / -0
    I understand WalMart has the legal right to the money, but is there a company anywhere as large as WalMart that makes worse public relations decisions? I'm not even talking about doing what's right, because I can see WalMart's side. But everytime they do something like this they have to realize it's going to be another negative headline about their stores.
     
  9. isuno1fan

    isuno1fan Well-Known Member

    Mar 30, 2006
    19,083
    612
    113
    Clive, Iowa
    Ratings:
    +972 / 158 / -0
    WalMart is completely in the right here. It is the employee's responsibility to be aware of what is and isn't covered and the terms of their health contracts.

    Additionally, WalMart is a publicly traded company. In case you didn't know it, they are responsible to their shareholders and when you are publicly traded the bottom line affects everything.
     
  10. Incyte

    Incyte Well-Known Member

    Apr 12, 2007
    4,865
    306
    83
    Ratings:
    +741 / 39 / -0
    This is standard procedure in the health insurance industry. There is no reason paticipants should be entitled to double recovery unless they contract (pay more) for that right. Wal-mart is held against a double standard because they are a big corporate conglomerate. The fact of the matter is there are suits to recoup double recovery all the time.

    In essense what we have here is shear sensationalism.
     
  11. wartknight

    wartknight Well-Known Member

    Mar 24, 2006
    6,733
    170
    63
    Ratings:
    +170 / 0 / -0
    Lawyer's fault.
     

Share This Page