Things do start leaking with age, that is true.I sure hope so. But my optimism is starting to leak.
Maybe it is just my age...
Things do start leaking with age, that is true.I sure hope so. But my optimism is starting to leak.
Maybe it is just my age...
No thanks. ISU wouldn't be within 1,000 miles of any Pac 11 teams.But it would at least open up one more spot in the Pac 12.
That would be tough, and expensive. But still better than the AACNo thanks. ISU wouldn't be within 1,000 miles of any Pac 11 teams.
Has the investigation of the KU Basketball program been completed? It would be inconvenient if any bad news came out at this time. I am assuming that there was nothing uncovered or we would have heard by now.
That would open up another Pac slot for the remaining Big VIII.Colorado def seems to be getting the most buzz at 16 from KU sources
But not having KU or Colorado takes away a lot of the appeal of a Pac 12 merger. This might mean we are once again looking at a reconstituted Big 12 as our one and only option.That would open up another Pac slot for the remaining Big VIII.
Sadly, I don't think the Pac will pursue ISU under any circumstance. Not sure why, but the National Group Think is that ISU is worthless - which is bunk - of course! Nothing that a Big Xii Championship and a couple of Position Trophies couldn't cure!I would much prefer the Big 10 take USC and Oregon than Colorado and KU. If the latter happens, I don't think the Pac 12 will pursue Iowa State.
But why would USC and Oregon want to play and travel 4 times a year to the Central and Eastern time zones? There has to be more than money, for every game with Ohio State and Michigan, you get one with Maryland and Rutgers.I would much prefer the Big 10 take USC and Oregon than Colorado and KU. If the latter happens, I don't think the Pac 12 will pursue Iowa State.
KU to UNC/Duke/Cuse is 2.5hrs flight time.If you are KU wouldn't you rather be playing closer games with Duke, UNC and Cuse as going to UCLA and Oregon?
No thanks. ISU wouldn't be within 1,000 miles of any Pac 11 teams.
And 1 more win for every FB team in the B1G West.Sucks, but can't deny that it makes more sense for the B1G.
KU compared to us: higher athletics revenue, similar research $, and a medical school.
Why does the internet keep portraying that if 4 teams decide to leave then the GOR and charters are over? Doesn't make any sense. It's not a majority in any which way.The only way this Kansas rumor would make sense is if one other team is also leaving. Kansas wouldn’t want to put themselves at the same buyout risk that OU and UT are facing. If they know one other team is leaving, then KU secures their future and avoids the buyout.
I believe 6 of the 8 remaining would have to vote to dissolve the Big 12.Why does the internet keep portraying that if 4 teams decide to leave then the GOR and charters are over? Doesn't make any sense. It's not a majority in any which way.
I'm guessing because 4 makes it "impossible" to hit a super majority in a 10 team vote. What people don't understand is that they thought of this and once you're a disinterested party (ie someone leaving) you lose your right to vote. So now you made a 10 team vote a 6 team vote.
Yes but I was referencing the scenario of 4 teams leaving which seems to be some magic number that keeps getting thrown out there.I believe 6 of the 8 remaining would have to vote to dissolve the Big 12.
Yeah I don’t think 4 teams leaving does anything but I could be wrong.Yes but I was referencing the scenario of 4 teams leaving which seems to be some magic number that keeps getting thrown out there.