We are easily building the All Name Team at QB for the foreseeable future.
Zeb Noland
Re-al Mitchell
Brock Purdy
Easton Dean
"And it all started with a boy named Steele..."
We are easily building the All Name Team at QB for the foreseeable future.
Zeb Noland
Re-al Mitchell
Brock Purdy
Easton Dean
I'm excited about this guy - but won't be truly comfortable until he is on campus. I think that KSU will keep trying to pry him away from us. I can only hope that Easton believes that the Wizard will NOT be the coach anymore or will retire in the next two years. That coaching question mark may help us out.Hey, a recruiting commit thread bump without a decommit! I like that.
Only fair since it cost us a win last year. **** the Fighting Surlys.I'm excited about this guy - but won't be truly comfortable until he is on campus. I think that KSU will keep trying to pry him away from us. I can only hope that Easton believes that the Wizard will NOT be the coach anymore or will retire in the next two years. That coaching question mark may help us out.
Check out his Labette County HS uniform (pic from DSM Reg article, not ISU vs Creighton!!):
View attachment 53542
Navy blue pants? Don't want. (I don't have to label this as sarcasm, do I?)
That was my impression.Aren't they dark grey like ours?
I'm excited about this guy - but won't be truly comfortable until he is on campus. I think that KSU will keep trying to pry him away from us. I can only hope that Easton believes that the Wizard will NOT be the coach anymore or will retire in the next two years. That coaching question mark may help us out.
LOLIf he sticks by his word and becomes a high 4 or even 5(?) how awesome would that selling point be?
We'll Doyleize him and switch him to tackleI suppose we could turn him into a TE like the TOE.
We’ll give him Rhabdo and switch him to tackle? I’m afraid I’m not following your logic here...We'll Doyleize him and switch him to tackle
It was a bad joke. Theyre always bragging about te's and ot'sWe’ll give him Rhabdo and switch him to tackle? I’m afraid I’m not following your logic here...