Just reading through this, but does anyone else feel like Oklahoma is less than the sum of its parts? They have a lot of great individual talent starting with Young, but they've developed throughout the season in way that is too dependent upon him and it makes the team inconsistent and one dimensional.
Definitely, I would compare it to Seneca's Sr. season. It seemed like the rest of the team just stood around waiting for Seneca to do something amazing. Resulted in the team greatly underperforming.