Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Mens Basketball' started by CycloneRulzzz, Feb 12, 2020.
Yes. No spoiler.
How do people rate this optimistic? Lol. 2017-18 team sucks horribly, but they still could beat a top 25 team. They also had 4 wins in a harder Big 12. This years team will have less in a bad conference. This year is historically bad.
I'm good with rolling with Bolton, though the offense struggled with him as the primary ball handler. As it stands now Jackson is no more a point guard than Conditt.
I like you, but zero chance.
Win two more and we may have a shot at the CFP!
I agree. Some just get overly dramatic, like what's happening right now, has been going on for 2+ seasons. As of the beginning of December, after the Seton Hall win, many on here were thinking Ncaa tournament. Obviously, the team has fallen hard, but let's not act like we're in some 4 year drought.
Bolton has been awful lately. Really gonna need him to step up to have a chance in any game
Well, at the very least I can lose the same number of games for just a fraction of the pay.
we’d save $2.375mm
With the injury, I suppose NBA scouts will quit attending our games.
Boosters gotta be sick at the amount this guy is getting paid
$2.375mm is what we’re paying this guy
I’ll answer that: This years team sucks and so does Prohm, but comparing them to 17/18 via KenPom and other analytical sites clearly shows this team as better.
If Nixon, who is shooting 33% from the field and 23% from three, is the one taking the most shots, then we may not win another game the rest of the year.
For those saying that we will finish better record wise or Kenpom wise compared to 17-18 you are crazy. We dropped 12 spots tonight and our currently 82 in Kenpom. If we finish 5-13 or worse we will be 110 range or so. We finished #103 in Kenpom in 17-18.
The 17/18 team would beat this year’s team by 20.
Another fun fact for those that used to debate that Prohm was superior to the previous regime. (Cat and the gang)
In five years and Prohm still has at least 8 games:
Losses by 13 or more:
Losses by 20 or more:
Hoiberg 5 (3 in year 1)
I understand why people don’t like CFH because he left Iowa State. Everyone is entitled to that opinion but I can’t imagine us being consistently as non-competitive as we have been in two or the last three with him at the helm. Hell Nebraska took Maryland to the buzzer last night with a roster just as bad as we have.
Take out the first two years where Prohm was using CFH players and you see how terrible he is. We will have a losing record again next year which means with his own recruits CSP will have a losing record in 3 out of the 4 years. GTFO!!!!!
Why does the filter do that to "Fred"?