Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Football' started by zimman18, Sep 29, 2012.
He's pretty damn solid in the non-conference, and just terrible against Big 12 teams.
Unfortunately, I don't know what better option we have.
There is a lot of issue with the O, but Jantz is one of the issues.
Agreed. Can't win football game by losing the turnover battle and he turns ito over too too too many times and I'm ****ing sick of it.
It's more than a QB problem. (yes I'm putting this in multiple threads)
I'm afraid he's still the best option.
BTW our front page atm makes us look like HN.
Offensive line was horrible, play calling horrible, quarterback play was horrible, horrible offensive performance.
Jantz dropping the ball, then holding the ball one handed again in the next series tells me that its time to find someone better. Think Tiller could move back?
I can understand that everybody has bad games... but that was awful.
You are spot on... This is not just a Jantz thing.
Jantz was bad, but...
The OL was horrible tonight.
The play calling has been horrible all season.
The offensive scheme has been horrible not just all season, and not just under CPR's tenure, but for as long as I can remember.
Jantz was bad tonight, but I don't think another QB does any better.
He is really not good. He does have his moments, but unfortunately he has more terrible moments.
You are correct, that was bad, but it was not all him. He had absolutely zero time to do anything.
I don't understand why some continue to defend Jantz. It's like they want him to be the leader so bad that they had hyped him into coming out of JuCo. They occasionally mentioned potential. If you're still talking about potential a third of the way through your senior season - you'll still be talking about when forty.
Ok, so say we don't have a better option. How about next year?
No one is suggesting Jantz was the only player in our uniform that performed poorly tonight. People are merely suggesting that we're receiving atrocious production at the most important position in team sports, and it isn't exactly new.
He is a risk reward QB and this team doesn't need that, they need someone who will take what the defense gives up and consistently is moving the ball. I don't care if that is Barnett or Richardson, just some one who isn't as turn over prone as Jantz is.