NFL Season Likely to be Lengthened!

DaddyMac

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
14,071
451
83
Pro football is far and away the most popular pro-sport out there.

Why mess with it?

Oh, I'm sorry. Clearly this is a money grab. Onward.
 

gocubs2118

Well-Known Member
Mar 31, 2006
18,596
2,826
113
36
Illinois
4 preseason is WAY too many. They should just cut that down to 2 and leave the regular season the way it is.
 

mj4cy

Asst. Regional Manager
Staff member
Mar 28, 2006
31,218
13,595
113
Iowa
Not a fan of it because it's going to make more worthless weeks of fantasy football. Plus, with my league, the way it is now is perfect. So selfishly, I don't wan it.
 

Cyclones_R_GR8

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 10, 2007
22,658
24,134
113
Omaha
4 preseason is WAY too many. They should just cut that down to 2 and leave the regular season the way it is.

The preseason is pretty pointless now. Back when players worked regular jobs during the offseason it was relevant as they needed to play some to get into game shape. Now they don't need to work that second job and with the offseason conditioning programs you don't really need all those preseason games. 2 games should be enough to evaluate players fighting for those last couple of roster spots.
 

mj4cy

Asst. Regional Manager
Staff member
Mar 28, 2006
31,218
13,595
113
Iowa
This is the winning formula (and honestly I got along fine before the bye week).



This can't happen because players are contracted for 20 games. They get paid evenly throughout the preseason and the regular season. The players would obviously want to play less, but the owners have to pay them for 20, meaning they're playing 20 total no matter what.
 

cyhiphopp

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 9, 2009
33,267
14,536
113
Ankeny
I would hate to see the regular season lengthened and the result being, when good teams are in the playoffs, they get to sit their starters for last 4 weeks instead of the last 2 weeks. That would stink.
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
59,506
21,025
113
Macomb, MI
Not a fan - the way they set up the schedules is perfect the way it is right now:

6 against division foes
4 against foes from a division in your conference
4 against foes from a division opposite your conference
2 against the other two foes from your conference that finished in the same place as you in their respective divisions.

There's your 16 games. How would you schedule those two extra games? Not enough for another "go-around" in your division, not enough to face another division in either conference. The only thing your really could do is face another set of opponents in another tier in the standings, but that could get really confusing, or face two random opponents, which flies in the face of the simplicity of the current NFL scheduling system. Adding one or two extra games just doesn't work.
 

jumbopackage

Well-Known Member
Sep 18, 2007
5,481
249
63
The NFL regular season is largely irrelevant as-is. Adding more games makes it even more so.

In a perfect world, I think they would play fewer regular season games and have more teams in the playoff, since the NFL playoffs are really what the NFL is all about in the first place.
 

TarHeelHawk

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
8,595
190
63
44
W. Des Moines
4 preseason is WAY too many. They should just cut that down to 2 and leave the regular season the way it is.

Having not read the article, I believe that this is what Goodell wants to happen anyway. Eliminate 2 pre-season games - which are way more of a cash grab, btw - and tack the other 2 onto the regular season. Calendar wise, the schedule stays the same.
 

clintr

Active Member
Nov 12, 2007
441
30
28
Ames, IA
Go ahead and round it up to 24 games total with every team, with the exception of two teams (mainly Detriot and Kansas City), making the playoffs.
 

Mr Janny

Welcome to the Office of Secret Intelligence
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
Mar 27, 2006
41,125
29,368
113
How is the regular season largely irrelevant? This year had a fantastic end of the season. I agree that adding more games will cause more irrelevance, but the current system works great!
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
59,506
21,025
113
Macomb, MI
The NFL regular season is largely irrelevant as-is. Adding more games makes it even more so.

In a perfect world, I think they would play fewer regular season games and have more teams in the playoff, since the NFL playoffs are really what the NFL is all about in the first place.

If the regular season were irrelevant, why not just throw all 32 teams into a tournament starting in September and just be done with it? Because most fans would hate that idea more than an "irrelevant" regular season.

The regular season isn't irrelevant for three reasons:
1. It determines which 12 teams will vie for the championship
2. It makes money for the NFL.
3. While some fans think it might be too long right now, fans like the idea of blowing Sunday afternoons watching "irrelevant" games throughout the entire fall and the early parts of winter.

Maybe the last several weeks become irrelevant for some teams (largely those teams that are clearly not going to make the playoffs or those teams that have already solidified their position in the playoffs). But tell the 12 or so teams and their fans that were fighting for their playoff lives/for playoff position/to knock a team out of the playoffs, particularly the Philadelphia Eagles fans, that the regular season, and week 17 in particular, is irrelevant...
 

ISUFan22

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
33,922
904
113
Denver, CO
I love football and generally, more football is a good thing to me. I agree the current system is fine. It's been proven time and time again, this year included, the regular season is not irreverent at all. I continue to be amused when this "argument" comes up.

I am concerned of what 1 or two more regular season games will do though. I agree the preseason needs to be shortened but not sure the regular season needs to be extended.

But you can bet I'll watch those extra games. :)