Could have once said that about Northwestern. And Vanderbilt. Ole Miss. Oh, and Baylor....Iowa State will never produce top 25 recruiting classes in football. You can write that down in permanent marker right now.
While cool, given the note about no longer having graduate assistants for S&C isn't this pretty much a zero sum change? We have the same number of people working in the weight room. We just are calling them something different.
I'd say it's quite a bit different. I know nothing about what GA's do, but the learning curve for them has to be much steeper and having to replace GA's every year versus the stability of two more full time "permanent" staff seem like positives.
The title isn't misleading. It's only misleading if you read "makes" and think "gets".
Chris Williams, 2 things I don't appreciate from your Musings,
1. Your pessimism regarding recruiting, one never knows.
2. The blue balls I now have thanks to the title
Jimlad Implied. Keep up the good work.
The front page just says "Another Big Commitment" which could be seen as misleading.
Could have once said that about Northwestern. And Vanderbilt. Ole Miss. Oh, and Baylor....
Is physical proximity seriously still a recruiting tool? Waco Tx is not a destinationI'll give you Northwestern. Vandy and Ole Miss are in prime recruiting areas and play in the SEC. Baylor, while being Baylor, is still in Texas.
Is physical proximity seriously still a recruiting tool? Waco Tx is not a destination
Our location has a HUGE effect on our recruiting. Not just because we're the northern most school in the Big 12, but we're in the middle of Iowa people.... Not many people think about going to Iowa for a whole lot besides getting some corn, and this little gem 'people live there?!'.
Our proximity to pretty much nothing, the lack of things to do, and the lack of a large name brand is exactly why we can't get 5 star recruits here. They don't care about the name so much as they care about winning and getting stats on the board. That's a tough thing to compete with against, Oklahoma, Baylor, Okey State, Texas, Texas Tech, etc who all happen to be within a few hours drive of one another, and also just happen to be where around half the Big 12's recruits come from. Of course it matters....
I don't think location is an issue, or Nebraska never could have mattered. We just weren't good in the early days when people were building traditions.
In case you haven't noticed Nebraska is not all that great anymore. I mean, barely top 25 and they have fantastic name recognition and brand value. Why are they a shell of their former self? Recruits are from the south and if you give them a choice of Lincoln, Nebraska and (X southern school) they are picking the southern school close to home a majority of the time.