Lunardi Bracketology

Discussion in 'Mens Basketball' started by CyKings, Dec 16, 2013.

  1. CyKings

    CyKings Active Member

    Jun 5, 2013
    668
    51
    28
    Male
    Electrical Engineer
    Kansas City, KS
    Ratings:
    +110 / 0 / -0
  2. State43

    State43 Well-Known Member

    Nov 22, 2010
    15,836
    542
    113
    Graphic Designer
    Omaha, NE
    Ratings:
    +1,209 / 65 / -0
    I would LOOOOOVE a rematch with UK. Not scared of this UK team unlike the one we played 2 years ago.
     
  3. CysRage

    CysRage Well-Known Member

    Oct 18, 2009
    9,696
    452
    83
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    Ratings:
    +1,079 / 25 / -0
    It was already posted but who's complaining! I love to see that we could potentially be a 5 seed and maybe even better! :yes:
     
  4. CoKane

    CoKane Well-Known Member

    Oct 26, 2013
    11,481
    318
    83
    Cedar Rapids
    Ratings:
    +691 / 25 / -0
  5. cmjh10

    cmjh10 Well-Known Member

    Dec 5, 2012
    14,433
    587
    113
    Iowa Falls
    Ratings:
    +1,517 / 105 / -0
  6. stormchaser2014

    stormchaser2014 Well-Known Member

    Mar 12, 2012
    13,229
    1,317
    113
    Wisconsin
    Ratings:
    +3,016 / 123 / -0
    Badgers are so overrated, they play Prairie View A&M next, who is 2-8. Only good teams they've played have been Florida, Marquette, and UVA. They have only played 2 road games. Wouldn't be surprised if Iowa and Illinois beat them on their home floors
     
  7. Dingus

    Dingus Well-Known Member

    May 23, 2013
    2,333
    47
    48
    WA
    Ratings:
    +197 / 18 / -0
    Iowa will split with Wisc, both winning at home. Wisc is overrated but is still good and very tough to beat at home.
     
  8. cyclones500

    cyclones500 Well-Known Member

    Jan 29, 2010
    15,824
    705
    113
    Male
    writer/editor
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +1,609 / 29 / -0
    Overall, minor quibble with a few placements in his bracket in the 1 to 3 seed range, no more than one line with most of it. I didn't analyze it much after that.

    Iowa State at a 5 seems about right this week, as a snapshot.

    As I mentioned in related threads, if ISU held steady with current resume, I foresee 4/5 scenario with a good change both teams are out of region (such as Spokane vs. UK, as in Lunardi's bracket).
     
  9. CyFan61

    CyFan61 Well-Known Member

    Oct 25, 2010
    14,540
    259
    83
    Ratings:
    +264 / 0 / -0
    I know this is December, but let me drink some Kool-Aid and say why that bracket would be amazing.

    *Toledo in round one. Enough said.
    *Rematch with Kentucky with the Sweet 16 on the line. Tons of national attention in this game.
    *Syracuse and their zone defense against Fred's offense? This game would have 200 points scored in it. Let's say we pull it out.
    *Michigan State and Villanova would be (in my opinion) the weakest 2/3 pair out of any bracket.


    I'd give us a really good shot at Final Four if we got this draw somehow.

    And then... a rematch with Ohio State and Aaron Craft in Dallas? Winner to the national championship?

    We then proceed to square off against Iowa in the title game :jimlad:
     
  10. cyguytillidie

    cyguytillidie Well-Known Member

    Feb 9, 2010
    11,240
    248
    63
    Male
    Des Moines
    Ratings:
    +253 / 0 / -0
    How many teams were mentioned before ISU?
     
  11. cyclones500

    cyclones500 Well-Known Member

    Jan 29, 2010
    15,824
    705
    113
    Male
    writer/editor
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +1,609 / 29 / -0
    If we're taking the bracket as it's presented, I'll play along. I'd meet you partway.

    *Mathcup w/ Kentucky would provide intrigue on second-week Thursday/Friday.

    *Disagree on the 2-3. I think the most vulnerable subregion for 2 & 3 is Wisconsin and Wichita State IF Iowa State happened to advance to Elite 8 as a 5 (and assuming all of these 2's and 3's reached the Sweet 16) — I think those are less-daunting draws for an underdog than UConn/Michigan State.

    *Fred system might be able to exploit Syracuse style — although we saw some evidence to the contrary when Iowa used a zone. Would we find just as many advantages vs. a team like Louisville in 1-5?

    *I see several places with potential bracket explosion (in various rounds). Which is fairly consistent with the actual tournament.
     
  12. Thomasrickj

    Thomasrickj Well-Known Member

    Feb 26, 2012
    3,026
    143
    63
    General Contractor
    Fairfax, VA
    Ratings:
    +473 / 55 / -0
    I wouldn't look too far into this bracketology. Kentucky shouldn't be a 4 seed. By the end of the season, I expect these arrogant, selfish, players from Kentucky to be an NIT team.
     
  13. erikbj

    erikbj Well-Known Member

    Aug 31, 2006
    7,288
    224
    63
    compliance officer
    hiawatha, ia
    Ratings:
    +403 / 32 / -0
    I think its a bit disrepectful, ISU is in first place in the toughest conference in the country. I think a 1 or 2 seed is justified.
     
  14. MIClone

    MIClone Well-Known Member

    Aug 31, 2011
    2,334
    29
    48
    Biologist
    Central Michigan
    Ratings:
    +31 / 0 / -0
    No way Ohio State would make it out of that bracket.
     
  15. EYEoftheSTORM

    EYEoftheSTORM Well-Known Member

    Jan 3, 2009
    2,857
    84
    48
    Male
    Ames, Iowa
    Ratings:
    +174 / 18 / -0
    Man would I love that!!! and the subsequent head explosions from that pile of **** fan base in Lexington from 2 straight NIT appearances… All with the self proclaimed "college dream teams".

    I hope the teams like Kentucky, Kansas, UNC realize that you can have all the talented "boys" on your team to beat ****** teams, but mature men win the tough ones.
     
  16. AMarner32

    AMarner32 Well-Known Member

    Jul 11, 2013
    2,243
    29
    48
    Ratings:
    +37 / 2 / -0
    You do realize that we haven't played Baylor, Kansas, Oklahoma or Oklahoma State yet, right? Or any big 12 team for that matter? We aren't in first place in the Big 12. I don't know if Lunardi does his rankings right now based on how he projects the year will go, or if he says "if the season ended today..." but either way we shouldn't be a one or a two. If you go with the "if the season ended today..." system then MAYBE we are a 3 seed but that system doesn't make sense because nobody knows who is conference champions, etc. I think a 5 seed is fair. Anything 4-6 works.
     

Share This Page