Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Football' started by Luth4Cy, Dec 18, 2013.
Hadn't heard any rumblings about Krick. I wonder what happened? Hate to see either of them go!
DT is a cursed position for us. Man alive.
That last paragraph is really poor.
Was he still a walk-on? That could be why.
Perhaps nothing more than not getting a scholly for his senior year, and wanting to graduate and move on.
At what point is it okay to suggest we may have a Shane Burnham problem?
It's okay as long as you can back it up and don't suggest him as the next DC while saying he's a bad position coach.
Why not? Go ahead, attack another coach for whatever reason, everyone else does.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think we've had any scholarship defensive tackles or nose guards leave the program under CPR?
Last year we lost Bevins. But it's a bad theory.
Can't blame Krick as he was a walkon.
You can't blame Jensen either if he leaves, but that would sting a little more as he is a scholarship player.
Collin Bevins. So clearly, we have a Shane Burnham problem.
I find your signature line to be ironic in this thread, Aclone.
What was Bevins?
Please elaborate? Krick was a walkon, they leave the program all the time, especially when they do not earn a scholarship and have already been here for 4 years.
He's just making too much out of a coincidence.
Holy crap, how'd I forget about Bevins. Even if Jensen leaves though, he doesn't have awful numbers of guys transferring out, just kind of hit a bad stretch.
Not sure that there is a Shane Burnham problem. Bevins left because he supposedly had some issues and never really felt comfortable at ISU. Krick leaving possibly because he is a non-schollie player. Jensen leaving because he has been at ISU for 4 years and quite possibly graduating and wants to move on. So not sure how you lay this on Shane Burnham unless you know something we don't.