Just talked to a reliable source that works on campus it has to do with theft, but the search warrant turned up nothing, there is also someone else involved that may be the guilty party, but this individual is not an athlete.
Just talked to a reliable source that works on campus it has to do with theft, but the search warrant turned up nothing, there is also someone else involved that may be the guilty party, but this individual is not an athlete.
If it's not true, I believe the University should release a statement so Sims' name can be cleared and I hope the Rag will publish it too.
If it's not true, I believe the University should release a statement so Sims' name can be cleared and I hope the Rag will publish it too.
Lets assume it was the other party or that there was no finding of wrongdoing, that is why you need to be careful about prematurely identifying someone in public.
Put yourself in his shoes if he is found to have done nothing wrong.
Lets assume it was the other party or that there was no finding of wrongdoing, that is why you need to be careful about prematurely identifying someone in public.
Put yourself in his shoes if he is found to have done nothing wrong.
I have to say that it would have seemed strange to me that a guy who stands an excellent chance of drawing a big, fat NFL paycheck a year from now were doing anything aside from taking care of business for the next six (or twelve) months.
I dont know the name of the other individual involved, they are just not a student athlete thats all I heard.Lets assume it was the other party or that there was no finding of wrongdoing, that is why you need to be careful about prematurely identifying someone in public.
Put yourself in his shoes if he is found to have done nothing wrong.
Okay do disorderly conduct then. I bet you get the same results. FWIW- Plenty of articles in the Gazette and Press-Citizen when you Google assault.. Just sayingProbably because he was charged with disorderly conduct not assault
I dont know the name of the other individual involved, they are just not a student athlete thats all I heard.
Just saying you need to look at the number of reports and timing. Yes, I know they are the same company. I question why the Rag didn't cover it as well as their sister paper.This makes zero sense. The PC and the DMR are owned by the same company, share resources, and often stories. The DMR also maded dozens of public record requests around the case. That seems at odds with the DMR turning it's head.
Enough with the Hawkeye comparisons. It has nothing to do with this case. Good lord people.
Is there a way posters would have to prove they aren't completely incompetent before they could post? 50 practice posts to prove your value to the conversation?
I'm referring to the Des Moines tabloid running a story identifying an ISU athlete based on nothing more then internet messages and confirmation of a possible event by the athletic department.
Responsible journalists would have held this persons name from the public until there was something more concrete to report.
Well based on the last couple of posts of yours... you haven't proven much other then you somehow think you are the judge and the jury on the value of posts. Seriously.... GET A GRIP!!!!!!!
![]()
Love the image!
Well based on the last couple of posts of yours... you haven't proven much other then you somehow think you are the judge and the jury on the value of posts. Seriously.... GET A GRIP!!!!!!!
![]()
I can be the judge. So can you.
Threads like these often get watered down with dumb posters making dumb posts. That is fact.