bawbie

Moderator
Staff member
Mar 17, 2006
52,836
42,986
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
I'm not, your side is the one lying. If I was not so dang busy I'd dig into the data and prove it. They said exactly what happened. They included months worth of antigen positive test's into just a few days.

That is not the source of the positivity rate or the spike in the state. The antigen numbers did affect one day if you look only at the new numbers, but they were counting those as negative tests all along, so it only fixed the data, it didn't change the positivity rates on any given day (per the IDPH website)
 

3TrueFans

Just a Happily Married Man
Sep 10, 2009
59,367
53,337
113
44
Ames
I'm not, your side is the one lying. If I was not so dang busy I'd dig into the data and prove it. They said exactly what happened. They included months worth of antigen positive test's into just a few days.
And they shouldn't be including results from antigen tests for some reason?

https://idph.iowa.gov/News/ArtMID/6...increased-testing-volume-and-new-CDC-guidance
Antigen testing accounts for just 1.8% of all COVID-19 tests in Iowa at this time
The inclusion of antigen tests results in minimal change to the state’s positivity rate.
 

heitclone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 21, 2009
15,526
12,706
113
44
Way up there
With schools opening in person across the state (and a statewide positivity rate around 15%) and no further shutdown of in-person dining or a mask mandate, it is very unlikely that the rates will fall in the near term.

I think the new CMS regulations for LTC will be interesting, every facility will be testing all staff regularly, I will be tested 2x a week starting this week, due to our county being around 11%. We are a small company but the 90-100 tests we will be throwing in to the numbers each week could increase/decrease rates in our small population county, take in to account the other LTC facilities in the area and it's going to swing things one way or another pretty quickly. Obviously it will have less impact on the metro areas but these tests will make up the majority of people tested in most counties in the state, especially those looking at 10% or more rates right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bawbie

larrysarmy

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
2,371
1,017
113
Ankeny
Positivity rate is the percentage of total tests that are returned as a positive for the virus over a specific duration of time (one day, for example)

A positive test can also detect remnants of the virus (but no longer contagious), in some cases, up to 12 weeks after infection.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: bawbie

Big_Sill

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 4, 2008
1,150
1,680
113
42
What does the positive rate mean?
I'm no expert, but I was under the impression that the positivity rate is a measure of the testing adequacy, as a way to predict the actual virus spread. Most intelligent takes I've seen indicates you need to look at BOTH the # of tests, and positivity rate in order to draw any proper conclusions. If testing doubled, and positivity rates stayed the same... that is bad. As you test more, positivity rate should go down. Google will be more helpful than I am, but I find the statistical side of this interesting and would love to hear a statistics professor analyze this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jsb and bawbie

kcbob79clone

Well-Known Member

In before I read the over 200 responses so far (hand sanitizer and face mask on). Although I am disappointed in the reversal, I trusted the administration when the original decision was made and I trust them now. This speaks volumes of the leadership that can make a decision and is not afraid to reverse itself. In fact i trust them more now that these events have happened.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
54,127
62,366
113
Ankeny
Bruh c'mon, anyone who doesn't believe COVID is a hoax is a coronabro. And a communist. And a Satanist. And a black supremacist. You know the drill.

I contend the real 'coronabros' are the ones who go out and engage in nonessential high-risk activities and complain about having to wear a mask ,and act like those of us who simply limit our risk are 'giving up' or 'living in our basement' or any other number of things they've said to attack those doing the right things to get us through this sooner.
 

cycfan1

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2006
4,874
2,222
113
Ames
This had nothing to do with "corona bros" this was all driven by the concerns from City of Ames and Story county and their respective business owners that had to close their doors. Kudos to Iowa State for listening, it really shows how close of a relationship the city and school have.

I would hope all of the above were on board or at least consulted about the original decision. I would doubt their opinions changed in 2 days.

The outrage was mainly from those sitting behind a computer screen that wont go to the game anyway.
 

bawbie

Moderator
Staff member
Mar 17, 2006
52,836
42,986
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
I think the new CMS regulations for LTC will be interesting, every facility will be testing all staff regularly, I will be tested 2x a week starting this week, due to our county being around 11%. We are a small company but the 90-100 tests we will be throwing in to the numbers each week could increase/decrease rates in our small population county, take in to account the other LTC facilities in the area and it's going to swing things one way or another pretty quickly. Obviously it will have less impact on the metro areas but these tests will make up the majority of people tested in most counties in the state, especially those looking at 10% or more rates right now.

More baseline testing like that (of asymptomatic people) should drive down the positivity rates. But that's very good news - they should have been doing that all along
 
  • Agree
Reactions: heitclone

Trice

Well-Known Member
Apr 1, 2010
6,884
11,231
113
Way too many people have aligned their own personal self-esteem with the outcome of this attendance issue.

I thought 25K was aggressive. 25 *percent* might have been defensible although to announce that in the midst of a wave of national stories about Ames being the nation's hotspot was going to be an uphill battle from a PR standpoint regardless.

Where I think Pollard failed here was in anticipating the blowback he would get. Agree or disagree with it, I felt like that was pretty predictable, and if you're going to make a controversial decision against headwinds like that you need to be prepared to stick to your guns and absorb the criticism. If you're going to change course when things get hot, then you should anticipate the heat and just make a different choice in the first place. (I should add, all of this seems very un-Pollard-like to me so maybe it was Wintersteen who got squeamish, I don't know.)

But now Pollard has the worst of all worlds: bad publicity from the first (arguably bad) decision, another round of bad publicity from the new decision, plus he might have overcorrected and cost himself revenue by going straight to zero fans when instead aiming for 10-15K fans might have been hailed as a "more reasonable" choice when compared to 25K.

But that's just public relations and nobody will care in a few days.
 

CloneJD

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2020
1,134
1,852
113
I contend the real 'coronabros' are the ones who go out and engage in nonessential high-risk activities and complain about having to wear a mask ,and act like those of us who simply limit our risk are 'giving up' or 'living in our basement' or any other number of things they've said to attack those doing the right things to get us through this sooner.
I bet you're fun at parties.
 

bawbie

Moderator
Staff member
Mar 17, 2006
52,836
42,986
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
15% of Iowans have runny noses.

This is seriously problematic misinformation. It means that 15% of the tests in Iowa on a specific day came back as positive. It's not total number of Iowans. And a positive test means all sorts of things - including asymptomatic people
 

Al_4_State

Moderator
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
30,224
23,203
113
38
Driftless Region
Visit site
Way too many people have aligned their own personal self-esteem with the outcome of this attendance issue.

I thought 25K was aggressive. 25 *percent* might have been defensible although to announce that in the midst of a wave of national stories about Ames being the nation's hotspot was going to be an uphill battle from a PR standpoint regardless.

Where I think Pollard failed here was in anticipating the blowback he would get. Agree or disagree with it, I felt like that was pretty predictable, and if you're going to make a controversial decision against headwinds like that you need to be prepared to stick to your guns and absorb the criticism. If you're going to change course when things get hot, then you should anticipate the heat and just make a different choice in the first place. (I should add, all of this seems very un-Pollard-like to me so maybe it was Wintersteen who got squeamish, I don't know.)

But now Pollard has the worst of all worlds: bad publicity from the first (arguably bad) decision, another round of bad publicity from the new decision, plus he might have overcorrected and cost himself revenue by going straight to zero fans when instead aiming for 10-15K fans might have been hailed as a "more reasonable" choice when compared to 25K.

But that's just public relations and nobody will care in a few days.

That seems pretty obvious.

And still. What rock was she under to not be able to anticipate the blow back?
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Urbandale2013

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
54,127
62,366
113
Ankeny
The outrage was mainly from those sitting behind a computer screen that wont go to the game anyway.

It was probably more people who never would have attended the game at all, but are paying customers to the university- the students and their parents, who are already very unhappy about the mostly-online but full rate situation and having 25,000 fans in the stadium runs completely against that.

You've gotta remember that Wendy has larger constituencies than just the sports fans.