Iowa @ ISU 2019

Discussion in 'In-State Rivals' started by Gonzo, Jul 11, 2019.

  1. CyTwins

    CyTwins Well-Known Member

    Jan 20, 2010
    51,102
    7,879
    113
    Ankeny
    Ratings:
    +35,735 / 2,607 / -6
     
  2. madguy30

    madguy30 Well-Known Member

    Nov 15, 2011
    15,552
    2,475
    113
    Ratings:
    +11,696 / 341 / -5
    Eh, Okie State has been bad at defense for some time now. That's no secret. Same with OU.

    But the 'plays no defense' thing is a little odd when teams like Ohio State win the conference.
     
  3. BLHawk

    BLHawk Active Member

    Jun 25, 2019
    689
    48
    28
    Male
    Ratings:
    +477 / 76 / -143
    Ok, Okie State was ranked 49th in adjusted points allowed per play which is still way below their overall rank which is used when calculating ISU's SOS.

    The teams Iowa played (except UNI) had an adjusted points allowed per play average of 43.3.

    The teams Purdy faced as ISU's QB (except Drake) had an adjusted points allowed per play average of 46.
     
  4. BLHawk

    BLHawk Active Member

    Jun 25, 2019
    689
    48
    28
    Male
    Ratings:
    +477 / 76 / -143
    You still havent answered the question. Why do you use the team overall SOS to try and show what type of competition that Purdy faced as ISU's QB?
     
  5. CyTwins

    CyTwins Well-Known Member

    Jan 20, 2010
    51,102
    7,879
    113
    Ankeny
    Ratings:
    +35,735 / 2,607 / -6
    To make fun of anyone who thinks Purdy and Epenesa only put up elite numbers because of competition
     
  6. BLHawk

    BLHawk Active Member

    Jun 25, 2019
    689
    48
    28
    Male
    Ratings:
    +477 / 76 / -143
    That's what I thought, there is no valid reason to do it. It doesn't make any sense at all.
     
  7. CyTwins

    CyTwins Well-Known Member

    Jan 20, 2010
    51,102
    7,879
    113
    Ankeny
    Ratings:
    +35,735 / 2,607 / -6
    Ok so Purdy put up way better passing numbers than Stanley and can actually run the ball so how could anyone say we don't have the clear advantage at QB?
     
  8. Walmartthieves

    Walmartthieves Active Member

    Jun 24, 2019
    761
    29
    28
    Ratings:
    +544 / 120 / -1,279
    Running QB’s behind a bad OL is a recipe for injury. We will see if Purdy can beat the isu odds and be the first QB in almost a decade to start and finish a season.
     
    • Dumb Dumb x 2
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
  9. MeowingCows

    MeowingCows Well-Known Member

    Jun 1, 2015
    17,618
    2,611
    113
    Male
    IT
    Iowa
    Ratings:
    +14,618 / 601 / -6
    Wouldn't this imply both teams are facing statistically similar teams, and thus their raw stats become reasonable to compare...?

    As far as you can, anyway. They're still fundamentally different offenses. That said, for a thrown-to-fire freshman, Purdy's stats and overall gameplay were an anomaly.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  10. SEIOWA CLONE

    SEIOWA CLONE Well-Known Member

    Dec 19, 2018
    1,021
    224
    63
    Male
    Ratings:
    +1,267 / 102 / -9
    We have had a poor record with QB's and finishing the season, but we shall see. At least Campbell is not afraid to pull one for poor performance or injury. Something old KF refuses to do, hell two years ago in your bowl game Beutherds was getting the hell beat out of him, the national announcers were saying he is not healthy enough to keep playing. But good ol Kirk, just kept throwing him out there, even when the game was lost.

    Saw one site had ISU offensive line as one of the top 10 in the country. Now I will have to see that to believe it, but we do return all five starters. This this OL is not a least decent, we will never have one that is.
     
  11. madguy30

    madguy30 Well-Known Member

    Nov 15, 2011
    15,552
    2,475
    113
    Ratings:
    +11,696 / 341 / -5
    What site?

    And top ten for returning letter winners?
     
  12. BLHawk

    BLHawk Active Member

    Jun 25, 2019
    689
    48
    28
    Male
    Ratings:
    +477 / 76 / -143
    This is at least factual. I didn't ever say Iowa had the advantage at QB.
     
  13. BLHawk

    BLHawk Active Member

    Jun 25, 2019
    689
    48
    28
    Male
    Ratings:
    +477 / 76 / -143
    Iowa played slightly better defenses.

    CyTwins was saying Purdy put up much better numbers while ISU played a more difficult schedule which is an odd way of looking at this.
     
  14. CyTwins

    CyTwins Well-Known Member

    Jan 20, 2010
    51,102
    7,879
    113
    Ankeny
    Ratings:
    +35,735 / 2,607 / -6
    So you agree ISU has the advantage at QB?
     
  15. CyTwins

    CyTwins Well-Known Member

    Jan 20, 2010
    51,102
    7,879
    113
    Ankeny
    Ratings:
    +35,735 / 2,607 / -6
    You know who graded out higher than Stone last year on PFF?



    Do you think Purdy is a top 2 round talent?
     
  16. BLHawk

    BLHawk Active Member

    Jun 25, 2019
    689
    48
    28
    Male
    Ratings:
    +477 / 76 / -143
    Yes
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  17. Walmartthieves

    Walmartthieves Active Member

    Jun 24, 2019
    761
    29
    28
    Ratings:
    +544 / 120 / -1,279
    Does anyone in the NFL think this? Maybe Remo who works for the Patriots will pick Purdy as a top 2 round talent.
     
    • Dumb Dumb x 2
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
  18. dexterhawk

    dexterhawk Well-Known Member

    Oct 17, 2013
    4,258
    647
    113
    Male
    Ratings:
    +3,817 / 352 / -61
    I don’t think you quite grasp the concept of trolling
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  19. Hawkmi

    Hawkmi Active Member

    Oct 9, 2013
    372
    118
    43
    Ratings:
    +621 / 22 / -3
    Well it must be almost time for camps to start. Let us all begin the great battle of "our team cares less than your team". Albeit the stupidest argument of all time, it remains a staple of discord within both sides of said rivalry.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  20. JP4CY

    JP4CY Well-Known Member
    SuperFanatic

    Dec 19, 2008
    22,040
    3,527
    113
    Testifying
    Ratings:
    +15,715 / 399 / -1
    Pot meet kettle.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1

Share This Page