Football is completely different, declaring early means your still there for three years.
And for most of those guys it takes a year or two to even see the field.
Football is completely different, declaring early means your still there for three years.
We’re still talking probably 10% of a roster as compared to 40-50+%.
Apples to oranges.
Most the guys that leave early see the field early.And for most of those guys it takes a year or two to even see the field.
Also, same could be said for Iowa football with Fant, Hockenson, Amani Hooker, Wirfs, Epenesa, Geno Stone, Anthony Nelson, Josh Jackson, and James Daniels all declaring early. But yet, Iowa has still won more games than ISU.
Also, same could be said for Iowa football with Fant, Hockenson, Amani Hooker, Wirfs, Epenesa, Geno Stone, Anthony Nelson, Josh Jackson, and James Daniels all declaring early. But yet, Iowa has still won more games than ISU.
Pretty easy to figure out. Each spot higher in this case is worth 0.6 more wins in a 5 year span. Or, per year, each spot higher in recruiting would equal 0.12 more wins per year. Thus, assuming you stay 30 spots hire and win at the same rate (doubtful since Doyle is gone), that means next year you should win 3.6 more games than ISU.Just think if the gap is 30 instead of 10. LOL
Yes, it is 1.2 more wins per year. But since you cant have a 0.2 win, that means it is really 1 extra win. Cant say for rankings let alone how you are getting 10 spots higher? You doing end of season, average per week of the seasons, or what? How do you account for when one team isn't ranked at all (aka the time isu wasn't ranked or when iowa wasn't ranked)? To many variables and doesn't seem to really matter because in the end its wins that matter, not what some writer who probably never watched either of their games thinks. So that's the point. For all the hype you hawk fans bring about your stud recruiting classes and what not and how, in hawk fans words, "isu's recruiting class is trash" that you are ONLY getting 1 more win per year. You think with how y'all hype it up that the gap would be larger.That is more than one win a year and probably at least a 10 spot difference in rankings so not sure what you are getting at. Iowa has ranked 18 spots better than ISU over the time span according to Sagarin.
Now if you really want to see who isn't getting the most out of recruiting classes, look at ISU bball. Woof!
All those players declared the same year? Wow, I didn't know that. It's almost like trying to replace a 22 man starting roster is much easier than a 5 man starting roster. CrazyAlso, same could be said for Iowa football with Fant, Hockenson, Amani Hooker, Wirfs, Epenesa, Geno Stone, Anthony Nelson, Josh Jackson, and James Daniels all declaring early. But yet, Iowa has still won more games than ISU.
That’s an incredibly stupid take. If you can’t see why that’s not apples to apples, you’re dumber than I thought.Also, same could be said for Iowa football with Fant, Hockenson, Amani Hooker, Wirfs, Epenesa, Geno Stone, Anthony Nelson, Josh Jackson, and James Daniels all declaring early. But yet, Iowa has still won more games than ISU.
Johnson is pushing for that ND offer pretty hard FWIW
Yes, it is 1.2 more wins per year. But since you cant have a 0.2 win, that means it is really 1 extra win. Cant say for rankings let alone how you are getting 10 spots higher? You doing end of season, average per week of the seasons, or what? How do you account for when one team isn't ranked at all (aka the time isu wasn't ranked or when iowa wasn't ranked)? To many variables and doesn't seem to really matter because in the end its wins that matter, not what some writer who probably never watched either of their games thinks. So that's the point. For all the hype you hawk fans bring about your stud recruiting classes and what not and how, in hawk fans words, "isu's recruiting class is trash" that you are ONLY getting 1 more win per year. You think with how y'all hype it up that the gap would be larger.
Ha, of course you wanna change it to basketball as y'all are good for once. Prohm has still done more in his time that Fran. But even though Prohm has absolutely smashed it out of the park on recruiting he definitely hasn't been able to put it together the last few years.
If Notre Dame offers he commits on the spot. Trust me on this oneHe is solid with Iowa. I was worried about him a few days ago, but he is solid. If the ND offer does come still 75/25 he’s a Hawk. There is a chance he would go to ND, but I got solid sources saying it wouldn’t be a done deal even if ND offers.
If Notre Dame offers he commits on the spot. Trust me on this one
Nice, straw man.ISU has had 40-50% of their basketball roster declare early for the pros under Prohm?
No? Posted at 1:33pm todayDid he already delete it?
I see a graphic from KSU today and then the most recent tweet is from 12/1 on his timeline.
Did he already delete it?
I see a graphic from KSU today and then the most recent tweet is from 12/1 on his timeline.