It's however anyone wants to spin the narrative. Some will say that he could've / would've started at the 3rd WR position, which doesn't get used a lot in Michigans offense. Some may also he was a starter. Neither are wrong. Saying that he was a stud WR or the best WR at Michigan is however wrong because he was neither of those last year and the likelihood he would've produced enough to live up to that this year at Michigan would've been incredibly low. Either way it's a win win scenario for Iowa.Yeah BUT, that's not what he said though. He specifically said, "He was at the top of our depth chart."