QB and it’s not close.
/threadQB. If we were known for having several high end QBs, other positions would get better with recruiting because of our reputation.
QB and it’s not close.
/threadQB. If we were known for having several high end QBs, other positions would get better with recruiting because of our reputation.
Wondered how long it would take to get to sexual position. Second page. CF is slipping.69 U
Is the question what we have been known for or what do we want to be known for? If it's want then I'd say OL but if you look at what is in the NFL from ISU I wouldn't necessarily say it's QB or OL. Brock has really exceeded expectations but other than that we have Seneca who has probably been the most successful and Rosenfels. Prior to that you have to go back to like David Archer or George Amundson which are probably before a lot of people on here were born. OL, we've a few guys but nothing compare to Uof I. RB has been good recently with Hall and Montgomery. DL has had a few guys. But I'd say LB has probably been our best position. So I guess in my humble (and sometimes wrong) opinion my vote is LB U.
I know!Wondered how long it would take to get to sexual position. Second page. CF is slipping.
I was thinking something along those lines but in terms of covering a kick off after we finally get the score we need or punting literally any time anywhere. Honorable mention to kicking field goals. Mevis was good.Fetal Position....as in we are all in the fetal postion after giving up 12 yards on another 3rd and 11.