I hate ESPN and their predictions

Discussion in 'Campus Life' started by chadly82, May 6, 2013.

  1. chadly82

    chadly82 Well-Known Member

    Sep 10, 2009
    1,892
    40
    48
    Ratings:
    +100 / 10 / -0
  2. cytown

    cytown Member

    Aug 8, 2012
    971
    19
    18
    Ames
    Ratings:
    +27 / 2 / -0
    #2 cytown, May 6, 2013
    Last edited: May 6, 2013
    I cant recall the last time we were "predicted" to finish with 6 wins. So we have that in our favor. I also think winning all 3 non-conf games is a must this year.


    9.ISU
    Projected finish:
    3-9
    Win total range: 2-10 to 5-7
    Chance to win Big 12: 0 percent
     
  3. HOTDON

    HOTDON Well-Known Member

    Mar 24, 2006
    2,395
    86
    48
    Fort Dodge, IA
    Ratings:
    +90 / 0 / -0
    Frankly, I don't mind it. Since I'm not an Insider I can only see Texas, and am therefore forced to make up the rest of the list. I think people will be surprised who he picked to finish second in my head...
     
  4. mj4cy

    mj4cy Asst. Regional Manager
    Staff Member

    Mar 28, 2006
    23,312
    905
    113
    Male
    Structural Engineer
    Ankeny
    Ratings:
    +2,050 / 51 / -0
    I wonder if someone could put together CPRs 4 year win/loss totals vs. who has predicted him. I bet he would be +5-6 games.
     
  5. CtownCyclone

    CtownCyclone Well-Known Member

    Jan 20, 2010
    10,440
    588
    113
    Project Engineer
    Where they love the governor
    Ratings:
    +1,156 / 14 / -0
    Why do we care what ESPN thinks? The game is played on the field.
     
  6. chadly82

    chadly82 Well-Known Member

    Sep 10, 2009
    1,892
    40
    48
    Ratings:
    +100 / 10 / -0
    We dont care but still can hate them. Texas wont win the big 12 i would probably put my life savings on that one.
     
  7. CycloneErik

    CycloneErik Well-Known Member

    Jan 31, 2008
    74,825
    4,166
    113
    Grad Student
    Jamerica
    Ratings:
    +9,111 / 218 / -0
    What did they predict for us?
    That would really determine my hate level.
     
  8. chadly82

    chadly82 Well-Known Member

    Sep 10, 2009
    1,892
    40
    48
    Ratings:
    +100 / 10 / -0
    they said with the minimal amount of returning starters and also not finishing in top 75 in defense along with losing our best defensive players were in trouble because of the youth and that under CPR we have shown to be a giant killer but not a serious contender.....i think we are on the verge of being a serious contender though :yes:
     
  9. hexodat64

    hexodat64 Member

    Dec 5, 2011
    991
    20
    18
    Ames, IA and MN
    Ratings:
    +20 / 0 / -0
    We'll also finish 8th in the league in basketball too. And we were going to get destroyed by #2 OSU. Predictions are dumb. Gotta play the games
     
  10. alarson

    alarson Well-Known Member

    Mar 15, 2006
    27,279
    2,206
    113
    Male
    Advertising sales
    Ankeny
    Ratings:
    +6,790 / 187 / -0
    I wont begrudge anyone for a poor prediction. Gotta earn respect, and we havent really shown anything to the national crowd recently besides one game (which nationally, most would view as a fluke), and we've shown plenty of other awful performances (tulsa bowl game, for example) to even that out.
     
  11. iacyguy

    iacyguy Well-Known Member

    Nov 1, 2011
    2,343
    107
    63
    The Dirty Dodge
    Ratings:
    +249 / 5 / -0
    Prediction people need to start adding "The Paul Rhoads" factor into their predictions. The guy is worth 1.35 upset wins and at least 2.3 even odd wins! My math is also made up tho
     
  12. ricochet

    ricochet Well-Known Member

    Sep 4, 2008
    1,065
    83
    48
    Ratings:
    +172 / 0 / -0
    How dare they disrespect us and pick us to drop so far in the standings from last year! What, we finished 9th last year? Well LOUD NOISES then.
     
  13. Judoka

    Judoka Well-Known Member

    Jun 16, 2010
    16,680
    695
    113
    Timbuktu
    Ratings:
    +1,639 / 38 / -0
    I don't see how they would put 5-7 as the "best" case. UNI, Tulsa, Iowa, Baylor, Kansas, and WVU would be six wins. And you don't need cardinal tinted glasses to think that we have a legitimate chance to win all of those games.
     
  14. Rabbuk

    Rabbuk Well-Known Member

    Mar 1, 2011
    24,015
    957
    113
    Ratings:
    +2,999 / 100 / -0
    All 3 non-cons are a must every year if we want 6 wins any given year.
     
  15. Judoka

    Judoka Well-Known Member

    Jun 16, 2010
    16,680
    695
    113
    Timbuktu
    Ratings:
    +1,639 / 38 / -0
    All three non-cons should be a win every year. But we really need to be moving beyond the stage where 3 wins is that best we can muster in conference. I expect the defense to take a step back this season but if our offense still hasn't shown improvement in year five that is a very bad sign.
     
  16. Rabbuk

    Rabbuk Well-Known Member

    Mar 1, 2011
    24,015
    957
    113
    Ratings:
    +2,999 / 100 / -0
    I think at some point it's just the zone-read doesn't work here.
     
  17. NenoFone

    NenoFone Member

    Feb 12, 2013
    329
    18
    18
    WDM
    Ratings:
    +48 / 0 / -0
    Zero percent chance to win Big 12? In my experience there is no such thing as Zero percent chance, maybe very small, but not zero.
     
  18. ajk4st8

    ajk4st8 Well-Known Member

    Mar 27, 2006
    16,412
    438
    83
    Ankeny
    Ratings:
    +600 / 4 / -0

    Exactly. We have had 1 winning season since 2005. Thats pretty disastrous for most programs.
     
  19. JohnnyFive

    JohnnyFive Well-Known Member

    Feb 25, 2012
    4,331
    87
    48
    Ratings:
    +317 / 10 / -0
    Your life will improve greatly when you stop caring what ESPN and other media outlets with obvious conflicts of interest thinks about ISU athletics. ESPN loves it some SEC, some NFL, the La Lakers, the Heat, Tim Tebow and ACC basketball. Not everything else content-wise but a lot of it becomes secondary to them because they have to bow down to their bedfellows first, which leads to hack bloggers like Ubben or some other random guy who nobody has heard of producing regular everyday content.


    Seriously, when your lead blogger for a conference has admittedly never attended a game in at least two of the home stadiums but regularly visits the others? Does that sound credible to you?
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page