Very good point. Approximately how many drinks or beers does it take to get to .325? Need numbers.
Depends on the person.
Very good point. Approximately how many drinks or beers does it take to get to .325? Need numbers.
I’d be happy with a zero tolerance policy with progressive punishments based on BAC.
This view is in no way clouded by how they are treating CBD and marijuana like it’s black tar heroin in red states.
Saw the thread title and was hoping it was Chad.
Not sure what the big deal is. I've been way worse and can operate a vehicle just fine.
Not sure what the big deal is. I've been way worse and can operate a vehicle just fine.
Light weight. Isn't .325 about average for Iowa fans? YOLO!Yep... I would have been sound asleep about 5-6 drinks prior to that level
Without looking it up, I believe there is some sort of "aggravated" number where they usually don't or can't plead the offender down, I believe it's over .15 and the punishment is more severe, or something along those lines.
This is not true. For instance if it's your 2nd in a 12 year period, you can still plea down to a 1st no matter what you blow. The judge doesn't even look at the BAC when considering punishment.
This is not true. For instance if it's your 2nd in a 12 year period, you can still plea down to a 1st no matter what you blow. The judge doesn't even look at the BAC when considering punishment.
The only way to prevent rural drunk driving is to provide some kind of service to transport people. I bet Uber and Lyft have reduced urban drunk driving dramatically.
That said, I'd bet if you looked at the statistics, rural counties have far fewer traffic injuries and deaths (even per capita) due to alcohol. There's just less potential danger.
I use the analogy of firing a loaded gun off into the air. If you're in the middle of nowhere, the odds of hurting anyone are low. If you're in a city, the odds are dramatically increased. The law needs to be the same regardless, but if you're being honest about the danger of the two situations, you know there's a huge difference in the actual recklessness. Which doesn't mean it's acceptable or prudent to do it, ever.
This is not true. For instance if it's your 2nd in a 12 year period, you can still plea down to a 1st no matter what you blow. The judge doesn't even look at the BAC when considering punishment.
{Peaks head in...} the only reason that so many city and local governments are fighting Uber and Lyft so hard is because DUI's are a profit center for them and Uber and Lyft have put a pretty big dent in that income for local governments.
OWI's are on a rolling 10 year period. You can have 3 in 3 months, wait a little over 10 years and get another and you will be considered first offense. Doesn't make sense to me.
I'm pretty positive if you get one 11 years after your first one it's still a second offense. I know someone who got one a long time after their first and it a second offense, had to have been over 10 years
I'm pretty positive if you get one 11 years after your first one it's still a second offense. I know someone who got one a long time after their first and it a second offense, had to have been over 10 years