I like your line of reasoning, but an extra $2.8 million/year easily covers the cost of living increase.
If CFH chases the money, we can't stop him. If he wants the challenge, we can't stop him. It really comes down to whether we want to spend our time enjoying the ride or worrying about what happens when the ride stops.
Sure enough - and then some I'm sure.
What I'm trying to get across is I think ISU provides the ability to make a ridiculous amount of cash - over a longer term with really less result required. Look at the playoff coaches axed or forced out this year. It's nuts. Fred has 4 NCAA wins in as many years, 1 conf championship and he's what? Doubled his salary and tied it down for 10 years?
Dollar for dollar - we're screwed. No doubt. But the setup here is pretty close to being as sweet.
But I also believe the details also factor highly. Family in town, smaller town, kids in good/safe schools (of course that can be bought about anywhere), and I think given the age of his kids - the shorter season works in our favor. He's home far more often than he'll ever be in the pros. And this the time he probably really wants to versus when he was playing and the kids were young, not doing as much.
I may be diluting myself - but I really think we're pretty safe with Fred for a number of years still the twins are through HS - or pretty close to it.
Save some obscene amount of cash.
I think it'll really not be cash - but whether or not he desires the game/challenge/etc. I don't know that he does. I'm saying this from my view - you can buy a championship in the pros. Coaches truly build it in college. I think it's more of a "challenge" in college. I also think actual game-day coaching goes further in college than the pros.
50,000 ft perspective.
Last edited: