WTF did you expect? God you haters are un real.
Great game for CSP and his squad ...
- Thread starter surly
- Start date
WTF did you expect? God you haters are un real.
Agree and CSP stopped runs with timely TOs and changing defenses - I think we are seeing our coach growing right in front of our eyes.
About to play KU for the championship, and we're still at each other's throats about the coach? Get a grip people.
You might have a problem if...your "disappointment" is so strong that it makes you bitter after a 22-win team beats the regular season conference champion to get the conference tourney title game...
I liked that it was a game ISU won without bombing a ton of 3's ie: taking a lot of bad 3's. Showed some grit last night. Sure Shayok hit a couple game changers late, but overall ISU really came though with drives, work in the post, and with the mid-range shots.
I'll be satisfied if they make a ton of 3s to bury KU though.
I'll be satisfied if they make a ton of 3s to bury KU though.
Do you think ISU is Duke or UNC or Kansas? **** you are delusional 22 wins and playing for the BIg 12 is a damn good year.
I think that's something people miss. Coaches get better over time. He's in his fourth year in a power conference. He is still learning. Like it or not there's a good chance ISU will typically hire coaches that have to learn on the job.
Duke, UNC, or Kansas they are not. But I think they have the potential to be.
“Most talented team in the big 12.” Many have said that this year, I bet you’ve even heard it.
If you would have told me before the game we would only scored 63 points, I would have been almost for sure we’d have lost the game.
I enjoyed the analogy from one of the announcers last night (paraphrasing):
"That game was a boxing match. Iowa State won because they were the ones who landed their haymakers at the end"
Duke, UNC, or Kansas they are not. But I think they have the potential to be.
CSP sucks
Exactly. They shot only 27% on threes, but they picked up 10 offensive rebounds and out rebounded KSU by 14 overall. Instead of the other way, they in there fighting for the ball. They are also working for stops. 17 turnovers is a bit much, but as long as they are doing the other things, they can make up for that.
What the hell is a hommer?
All I can ask is for from a coach is to have a backup plan and keep the guys motivated. Plan A is make 3s. Plan B is minimize turnovers. We countered these shortfallls by rebounding and playing good defense. We changed our defenses. We made good outlet passes. Halliburton came alive. Jacobson fought like an animal for every rebound. This is a different way of winning - this is how basketball is meant to be played. Next game, maybe plans A and B will work.
Is there no reason to consider the quality of the opponent in analyzing how they played?
This is just sad. Find a new hobby. Do you bowl?
So you're happy when we lose or dont perform up to expectations? Sorry, I'm not a big supporter of everybody gets a trophy like you obviously are.
He's expecting us to put up 90 points on the 4th ranked ADJDE team in the country I guess.
Last night was about as gritty of a win as you can get considering the competition. Jacobson was in beast mode last night and it was nice to see us actually crash the boards on offense last night, I dont remember seeing that all year.
