1. What does the contract say? Where does the negligence lie. There should be a level of "risk assumption" related to building a house on a golf course. If a break window in a house after plunking a tree. I do not pay. Similarly if I'm a softball player and crush a window on a foul ball I do not pay. Now If I aim at the house and drive one through the living room I'm negligent and going to pay (if you can find me). Similarly if I run up to a car with a softball and throw it through the windshield I'm all in. This is mostly property damage which is pretty "clean".
2. what is not "clean" is the ball that goes onto 235 causes an accident with injuries. In this case I would be surprised if suit was not brought against the golf course. They have the money and the limits. They also have a "duty owed" to protect the public of the actions taking place at their business. I've often wondered why there is no net along 235?
2. what is not "clean" is the ball that goes onto 235 causes an accident with injuries. In this case I would be surprised if suit was not brought against the golf course. They have the money and the limits. They also have a "duty owed" to protect the public of the actions taking place at their business. I've often wondered why there is no net along 235?